2.0 6466 evo 9
Sep 23, 2017, 07:22 AM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: north east
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.0 6466 evo 9
Just installed infinity on the car and made some pulls.
9 to 1 2.0
Manley turbo tuff rods
Wiesco hd pistons
Gsc s3 cams
Stock ports on the head
Curt brown ported skunk 2 intake manifold
Full blown throttle body
Shearer fab standard placement turbo kit
6466 t3 .82
Ts comp tune twin pump with -8 feed and -6 return.
2150 injectors
E85
Built trans and t case
Triple disc
Sorry if I left anything out.
Car is on 40 psi
Imw’s mustang dyno
9 to 1 2.0
Manley turbo tuff rods
Wiesco hd pistons
Gsc s3 cams
Stock ports on the head
Curt brown ported skunk 2 intake manifold
Full blown throttle body
Shearer fab standard placement turbo kit
6466 t3 .82
Ts comp tune twin pump with -8 feed and -6 return.
2150 injectors
E85
Built trans and t case
Triple disc
Sorry if I left anything out.
Car is on 40 psi
Imw’s mustang dyno
Sep 24, 2017, 01:37 AM
#2
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice. I am building a 2.3.
Mild porting
Solid lifters
With a 6466 .84 t4 flange divided
I am trying to figure out what the 6466 with a .84 rear is rated at,
Does anyone know what size rear housing precision rates their turbos?
Mild porting
Solid lifters
With a 6466 .84 t4 flange divided
I am trying to figure out what the 6466 with a .84 rear is rated at,
Does anyone know what size rear housing precision rates their turbos?
Sep 25, 2017, 08:17 AM
#4
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
As stated above you're going to at least want a 1.15ar hot side.
The following users liked this post:
Dakota Evo (Jan 20, 2018)
Sep 25, 2017, 12:46 PM
#5
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I choose .84 to keep it streetable. Rather sacrifice a bit on top and get a better punch, it's a four Cylinder bro. I asked a different question regarding the rated hp of that turbo with that rear housing. Has anyone tried the 6466 with a .84 rear and what was the result ?
Last edited by Sheriff; Sep 25, 2017 at 01:52 PM. Reason: Adding info
Sep 25, 2017, 03:37 PM
#6
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
I choose .84 to keep it streetable. Rather sacrifice a bit on top and get a better punch, it's a four Cylinder bro. I asked a different question regarding the rated hp of that turbo with that rear housing. Has anyone tried the 6466 with a .84 rear and what was the result ?
Sep 25, 2017, 04:32 PM
#7
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
Sep 25, 2017, 05:43 PM
#8
Originally Posted by Sheriff
I will have to wait till after the dyno to be sure to be sure. What did your combo make ?
Sep 25, 2017, 05:46 PM
#9
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sep 25, 2017, 11:25 PM
#10
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Sheriff
I will have to wait till after the dyno to be sure to be sure. What did your combo make ?
Sorry for the thread derail OP.
Sep 25, 2017, 11:34 PM
#11
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude that's is fkn insane. 600 plus kw. How much do you think I would loose running the .84? I would be jumping over the moon with the cat the fiddle and the silver spoon if I made 550 kw at all four
Sep 26, 2017, 02:13 AM
#12
Evolving Member
Sep 26, 2017, 07:50 AM
#13
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
And thanks. English Racing did a great job on the motor and tune. The owner is super happy with it.
