Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Risk with running engines with 1 or 2 low compression cylinders

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2018, 12:38 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Risk with running engines with 1 or 2 low compression cylinders

There seems to be many evos with 1 or 2 cylinders with low compression. What are the risk of running them (if the engine makes power, why fix it right?)?
And to fix them properly, does the block need honing? Realistically, I think most will want to rebuild their bottom end to handle 500-550 ft-lbs of torque.
I would think that if people get low compression and fix early, they will save block and maybe head. If running with low compression too long, wouldn't that cause cylinder wall to wear more?
Has anyone continue to run with low compressions? Any problems? The rest that fixed rings, what exactly was replaced, cost of repairs/upgrade, and did it hold up long? Thanks!
Old Mar 18, 2018, 04:25 AM
  #2  
Account Disabled
 
RightSaid fred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: in a garage
Posts: 714
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
If you fix it straight away, it's easy and cheap.
Just replace the piston / rod assembly.

If you keep driving it, you'll end up with a groove in the bore .
That's NOT and easy cheap fix.

I've stripped and measured hundreds of engines in all sorts of states with all sorts of abuse.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 18, 2018)
Old Mar 18, 2018, 08:58 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by RightSaid fred
If you fix it straight away, it's easy and cheap.
Just replace the piston / rod assembly.

If you keep driving it, you'll end up with a groove in the bore .
That's NOT and easy cheap fix.

I've stripped and measured hundreds of engines in all sorts of states with all sorts of abuse.
Isn't there already a groove since it is already leaking? Is it small enough that new rings will seal it? If compression test with a capful of oil seals compression, then is it salvageable? And what piston/rod/rings are good replacements?

Last edited by 2006EvoIXer; Mar 18, 2018 at 01:13 PM.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 09:01 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Also, if someone is going to replace rings, shouldn't they go ahead and replace pistons and rods at same time so engine can handle more power? Which are the combinations that people have done and have reliable engine? I hate seeing "upgrades" that just doesn't last or run right like OEM.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 10:07 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
I've heard of many evos making 500+whp on stock bottom end but rarely hear of failures. I know someone who made 700whp with torque tuned down to low 400s. It didn't last long. I'm wonder if bottom end should be upgraded as an insurance measure since a rod can destroy entire engine. Since most people will have their heads off for valve springs and head studs upgrade, this would be the time to upgrade bottom end (only pistons and rods?).
Old Mar 18, 2018, 10:47 AM
  #6  
EvoM Community Team Leader
 
Biggiesacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,688
Received 704 Likes on 592 Posts
i think its pretty well established that ~400ft-lbs is the most torque you want to run on a stock bottom end. The problem with doing a whole bottom end is there is just so much involved. The chance of something getting screwed up in some intermediate stage is pretty high. Thats why people are paying tons of money to ship their engines around the country, just to improve the odds they will have a quality piece in the end.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 18, 2018)
Old Mar 18, 2018, 11:28 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by Biggiesacks
i think its pretty well established that ~400ft-lbs is the most torque you want to run on a stock bottom end. The problem with doing a whole bottom end is there is just so much involved. The chance of something getting screwed up in some intermediate stage is pretty high. Thats why people are paying tons of money to ship their engines around the country, just to improve the odds they will have a quality piece in the end.
Some must have done it on their own. Has anyone been successful? And if not successful, what failed?

Last edited by 2006EvoIXer; Mar 18, 2018 at 11:33 AM.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 11:53 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
 
barneyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Island, NE
Posts: 6,902
Received 144 Likes on 128 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
Some must have done it on their own. Has anyone been successful? And if not successful, what failed?
Lots of people assemble engines. I've assembled engines. The trick is to have a good machine shop measure and fit the parts - the emphasis is on good here, shop around and ask questions. Read a couple of books on engine building, buy an engine stand and off you go.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 18, 2018)
Old Mar 18, 2018, 12:05 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by barneyb
Lots of people assemble engines. I've assembled engines. The trick is to have a good machine shop measure and fit the parts - the emphasis is on good here, shop around and ask questions. Read a couple of books on engine building, buy an engine stand and off you go.
I'm tempted to build my bottom end but don't want to make things worse after dumping more money into my car. I just want to change my rods and pistons and not touch my crank and bearings. I think I can unbolt the rods from crank and pull them out on top. Installing new pistons will probably only go in from top. Are there tested combinations of pistons/rings/rods that has held up reliably?

Last edited by 2006EvoIXer; Mar 18, 2018 at 04:40 PM.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 12:12 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by barneyb
The trick is to have a good machine shop measure and fit the parts - the emphasis is on good here, shop around and ask questions. Read a couple of books on engine building, buy an engine stand and off you go.
This is a good idea. I can have a machine shop check my block to make sure everything is healthy while pistons are out.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 12:23 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
I know this sounds crazy to do to my engine with 61k miles. I just cringe when I think about rods letting go and destroying block, head, and maybe containing oil that can get into every bearing (including turbo, oil cooler, rocker arm bearings, lifters, etc). After a catastrophic failure, it will be very hard (and expensive) to get the engine to run right again.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 02:18 PM
  #12  
Newbie
 
Dalewantsevo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leth. Ab. Can
Posts: 25
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did a stupid thing.
engine in chassis, pulled pan/pulled head and all, fitted new manley rods and pistons, rings and bearings, stock bore, used flex hone to hatch cylinders, all was ok, except...
after not only 550miles of under 4500rpm (virtually no boost) I just barley stepped into it and then spun rod bearing...ffs
I checked them all with plasti gauge and removed it before sending it, must have been some**** in my oil galley.
needless to say, one rod needs machined or replaced, crank needs redone or replaced and of course go theough entire engine and go from there...
ran beautifully during the 550miles break in...
but lesson learned.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 03:27 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Wow, that totally sucks!
Do you think it was dust from the flex honing? Where else could you have gotten debris to plug up your oil galley?

Originally Posted by Dalewantsevo!
I did a stupid thing.
engine in chassis, pulled pan/pulled head and all, fitted new manley rods and pistons, rings and bearings, stock bore, used flex hone to hatch cylinders, all was ok, except...
after not only 550miles of under 4500rpm (virtually no boost) I just barley stepped into it and then spun rod bearing...ffs
I checked them all with plasti gauge and removed it before sending it, must have been some**** in my oil galley.
needless to say, one rod needs machined or replaced, crank needs redone or replaced and of course go theough entire engine and go from there...
ran beautifully during the 550miles break in...
but lesson learned.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 03:36 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
TrendSetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: florduh
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Dalewantsevo!
I did a stupid thing.
engine in chassis, pulled pan/pulled head and all, fitted new manley rods and pistons, rings and bearings, stock bore, used flex hone to hatch cylinders, all was ok, except...
after not only 550miles of under 4500rpm (virtually no boost) I just barley stepped into it and then spun rod bearing...ffs
I checked them all with plasti gauge and removed it before sending it, must have been some**** in my oil galley.
needless to say, one rod needs machined or replaced, crank needs redone or replaced and of course go theough entire engine and go from there...
ran beautifully during the 550miles break in...
but lesson learned.
you messed up assembly. sorry.
Old Mar 18, 2018, 03:40 PM
  #15  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
TrendSetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: florduh
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
original topic; i had a friend that ran heads up nitrous (377 sbc but ice is ice) and went just as fast with one cylinder at 95% leakdown.
it depends on why it has low compression.
slamming together short blocks isnt too bad, just need some patience and keep it clean. whenever i help friends i enforce the rule that if they wont eat off it, its not clean enough yet.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 18, 2018)


Quick Reply: Risk with running engines with 1 or 2 low compression cylinders



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:31 AM.