Compression Test Difference
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Compression Test Difference
I have a noobish question regarding compression test results. Several months ago one of my valves decided to let go which caused compression issues in one of the cylinders - compression test results were 180 across except for the one, which was 0.
Had the same reputable evo shop do the work to fix it, valve job, HG, headstuds, timing belt, etc.. they put together and tuned my 2.4 setup in the past. Got the car back and did another compression test, result: 160 - 155 - 160 -155. Using the same compression tester.
What would cause this much of a difference in compression readings? Headgasket? The shop used a cometic 87mm HG (previous was - oem HG bored over).
Had the same reputable evo shop do the work to fix it, valve job, HG, headstuds, timing belt, etc.. they put together and tuned my 2.4 setup in the past. Got the car back and did another compression test, result: 160 - 155 - 160 -155. Using the same compression tester.
What would cause this much of a difference in compression readings? Headgasket? The shop used a cometic 87mm HG (previous was - oem HG bored over).
#3
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Probably different head gasket thickness. I wouldn't worry about it.
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter