MAPerformance Releases Short Runner Tubular Stock Replacement Manifold For $449.99!!!
#6
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ND
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, I happen to be one of those guys that snagged up this beautiful piece of hardware before they hit the shelfs. Here is a pic after about 1500 miles on it. It turned an awesome multicolor like on many motorbikes. As far as how it compares to stock ported mani, I could not say but on my 2.3L that you guys at MAP built for me, my FPBlack seems to spool very fast right near how my FPgreen on my old 2.0 did with the stock manifold. I love it! I put down 510WHP on MAPs dynojet at only 26psi. I have to get may car back down there to get the final tune and turn up the boost now the motor's is broke in. I can not wait to see what she'll turn out!
Check out the Dyno and more of the build and pics here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...o-build-2.html
This is a must buy for any stock frame turbo with the price/performance.
Good luck and happy sales!
Check out the Dyno and more of the build and pics here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...o-build-2.html
This is a must buy for any stock frame turbo with the price/performance.
Good luck and happy sales!
Trending Topics
#10
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
There are differing opinions out there, but the general consensus is that on a twin scroll application equal length is of little importance as the companion cylinders fire 180 degrees apart negating the benefits. And if you notice the companion runners are of similar length so there should be little interference between the pulses.
Additionally, anyone that would be able to have some before and after dyno testing performed with this product please contact me as we are willing to offer a substantial discount for your efforts!
Additionally, anyone that would be able to have some before and after dyno testing performed with this product please contact me as we are willing to offer a substantial discount for your efforts!
Last edited by ChrisCarey; Oct 19, 2010 at 09:33 AM.
#11
There are differing opinions out there, but the general consensus is that on a twin scroll application equal length is of little importance as the companion cylinders fire 180 degrees apart negating the benefits. And if you notice the companion runners are of similar length so there should be little interference between the pulses.
#12
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
The purpose of equal length is to keep the exhaust pulses evenly spaced for the best performance. When dealing with a single scroll application you have to deal with 4 exhaust pulses potentially interfering with each other, while a twin scroll application only has two exhaust pulses per scroll that are 180 degrees apart. Until I see testing that proves otherwise I am sticking to my opinion that equal length manifolds on a twin scroll application are unnecessary.
#15
The purpose of equal length is to keep the exhaust pulses evenly spaced for the best performance. When dealing with a single scroll application you have to deal with 4 exhaust pulses potentially interfering with each other, while a twin scroll application only has two exhaust pulses per scroll that are 180 degrees apart. Until I see testing that proves otherwise I am sticking to my opinion that equal length manifolds on a twin scroll application are unnecessary.