Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Boost Taper - Why?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #16  
Event-Horizon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 4
From: Atlanta, GA
I believe it is just a feature of the ECU and how the waste gate actuator is configured. There is a little trick to make the turbo hold more boost by adjusting the waste gate actuator. you do this by taking it off the turbo and turning the "rod" about three times or so. I believe its clockwise. I know of a guy locally that is holding 20 or so pounds of boost by doing this little "trick".
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:07 PM
  #17  
Ted B's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Well, when something doesn't seem to fit linear logic, I will definitely raise my hand to ask questions.

In any case, having just given myself a crash course in turbo sizing via online resources, it seems the 16g is just walking too quickly out of its efficiency range at that boost level and rpm.

Here's another nice website that discusses turbo sizing for a 2.0L engine: http://wolfkatz.com/DreamweaverDocs/...on%20Small.pdf

Looks like if you want more boost efficiency in those rpm ranges, you'll need to be 'livin large' = $$$
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:09 PM
  #18  
Jorge T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
this is the correct one for the TD05HR
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #19  
Jorge T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Also even with MBC it seems to taper...if ECU is not the cause, my suspicion is that the WG spring is not strong enough allowing the flapper to open up.
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:15 PM
  #20  
JTB's Avatar
JTB
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Forgive me if I am wrong but from what I have read, it has to do with the efficiency of the turbo. Stepping to 22psi from 19psi doesn't always produce a corresponding increase in WHP but it definately increases the stress on the engine.

I guess this is one of the areas skilled tuning comes in -- balancing efficiency, power and reliability.
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:18 PM
  #21  
Ted B's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
What are the X axis units? Is this chart identical to the 10.5t?
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #22  
Jorge T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
hate when they cut off parts of documents .... I believe kg/sec for the compressor yes the turbine side would be different
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #23  
Jorge T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
But even on this std rotation 16g 20 psi is in the 68% island
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #24  
Ted B's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
According to my chart, 22psi boost at 7000rpm requires ~0.28-0.29 kg/sec. This falls outside the turbo's efficiency zone (e.g. <68%), and it gets worse as the rpms increase.

Now I understand.
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #25  
Ted B's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Jorge T
But even on this std rotation 16g 20 psi is in the 68% island
On the EVO 2.0L, 20psi (2.4 bar PR) at 7000rpm requires ~530cfm, which is on the very fringe of the turbo efficiency window.
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #26  
MYEVOVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 0
From: Atl/Southeast
Thanks TedB I have also been wondering the same question and had heard the same conclusion now I am sure.
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:44 PM
  #27  
snoop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by ultraflip
with the addition of a piggy back with so many mods... will a person be able to pass smog anyway in CA?
Yes I passed with Stage 1
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #28  
WildRice's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Nothern CA
yep Ted B any turbo will reach its point of deminishing returns where it is making pressure by heating air. The net is more pressure but fewer molecules of 02. I believe it's boyle's law if my ole memory about physics is still with me.
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #29  
Jorge T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
So not even the 10.5 T is going to help us then oh well time to start saving up
Old Oct 12, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #30  
snoop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Good thread that should be a sticky

In end boost in higher RPM's will have diminising returns after a certain point.

Last edited by snoop; Oct 12, 2004 at 03:55 PM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:07 AM.