i wanna see slips!

 

maybe its because of the bypass?? i heard you can lose some power with the by pass, maybe 3-4hp?

 

 

On our application I bet the bypass is only snagging 1-2. I haven't yet tried my car without the bypass, maybe I'll do it before the summer is up.

 

-

I guess too much SOLO runs will do that to a guy...

-

 

Ill get the pics soon, since I dont know how to post them. But I have to scan the slip and also a scan of when the highest hp and the rpm that it starts to drop

 

ok make it fast..
host them on imageshack.com is fast and easy

 

E-mail them at the address in my profile and I'll preprare them and post them for you...

-

 

^

 

Amazing, isn't it?

 

So when are we going to see the pics.

We need to see the dyno results. To prove everybody that it's really true.

 

I have a dyno shop opening in town in a few days, I will be dyno-ing the RA all stock, then with 80 shot to see what whp I'm getting.

 

I got similar numbers with CAI and ECU as my only power mods. Anyone have ECU CAI and DP? I would like to see the difference. What kinda dyno was it? DynoJet?

BTW, I had the same problem with power dieing late in the powerband. I dyno'd after putting on the 2.5" catback and extended my powerband about +30hp for about 500rpms. Check both of my dyno sheets in the registry to compair.

 

I dyno'd at 138WHP 137Torque on a mustang dyno with CAI, AXEL-BACK, PIGGYBACK, i would like to see this 166WHP dyno sheet. I would also like to see what type of dyno was used.

 

poco, mustang dynos are known to be lower in ratings

i don't think you should even consider comparing the same brand and model.. dynos are so inconsistent between places that the only REALISTIC comparision would be on the same dyno, same car, before and after runs..

1. run car stock
2. add part
3. run car with part

and then get the delta (difference between stock run and part run) ..

-joe