Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

one of my body got one

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #16  
EsRt2evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Pgh, PA to Orl, FL
Originally Posted by dboz
That is the problem. Small performance gain, if any over a GTS especially considering AWD. Same wheels. Modest front and rear fascia changes. Dual exhaust and a high tech tranny. Head to head I think the GTS outperforms the RA in almost all categories.
Nah im sorry, not true.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #17  
captg's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by dboz
That is the problem. Small performance gain, if any over a GTS especially considering AWD. Same wheels. Modest front and rear fascia changes. Dual exhaust and a high tech tranny. Head to head I think the GTS outperforms the RA in almost all categories.
Yeah, like the previous reply. What are you talking about? The GTS doesn't have a turbo charger or the tighter suspension?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #18  
dboz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: ohio
I'm talking about this.

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=127586
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #19  
EsRt2evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Pgh, PA to Orl, FL
Originally Posted by dboz
Wheels and tires need replaced, it's pretty obvious. I'm sure the Evo would pull similiar numbers too if you threw crappy wheels/tires on it.

Besides that, i see two numbers that both have the wheels/tires to thank. Thats hardly beating it in every category.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #20  
Mors's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by dboz
That is the problem. Small performance gain, if any over a GTS especially considering AWD. Same wheels. Modest front and rear fascia changes. Dual exhaust and a high tech tranny. Head to head I think the GTS outperforms the RA in almost all categories.
You're out of your mind...you're talking about a car (GTS) that runs a 15.9 @ 88mph 1/4 mile as tested by R&T (16.5 @ 86.0 for the CVT version) vs. a car that ran a 14.1 @ 97 mph as tested by the same magazine? care to explain that logic?

The GTS outperforms the RA in no categories. Just as people are quick to say the RA outpeforms the EVO in no categories as well.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #21  
1wickedEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Tri State Area
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
Honestly i dont know. I just took a fast look every time we looked at the engine bay. But next time i will pay attention on that one too.
Hey Rob, Can't wait to see the pictures.

Oh, BTW- every time I visit my folks in Puerto Rico, the spanglish comes out like you wouldn't believe. I have two choices when I go there.
1- Stay at my folks and allow my Dad to drive me freaken nuts in order to avoid contact with the natives.
2- Venture out and watch people cringe as I brutalize the Spanish language.

Yep, you got it, I choose to watch the faces and learn not to add O's after every word...

I'm glad you've got a good sense of humor.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 08:07 PM
  #22  
dboz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Originally Posted by EsRt2evo
Wheels and tires need replaced, it's pretty obvious. I'm sure the Evo would pull similiar numbers too if you threw crappy wheels/tires on it.

Besides that, i see two numbers that both have the wheels/tires to thank. Thats hardly beating it in every category.
Since I don't drag race the 1/4 mile times do not really matter. I do like going fast though.

Don't get me wrong. I like the RA. I realize that the RA is faster in a straight line. Just saying that to buy a new car that requires 2 sets of new tires (winter and summer) is a little tough to swallow. My point was that for AWD and then have the skidpad and braking be so bad, you are telling me the GTS has awesome performance tires? Why not put those on the RA then?

I think tires help, but those are some pretty big differences to just blame on tires. I do think the brakes are fade resistant though.

Last edited by dboz; Oct 10, 2008 at 08:18 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #23  
dboz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Mors
You're out of your mind...you're talking about a car (GTS) that runs a 15.9 @ 88mph 1/4 mile as tested by R&T (16.5 @ 86.0 for the CVT version) vs. a car that ran a 14.1 @ 97 mph as tested by the same magazine? care to explain that logic?

The GTS outperforms the RA in no categories. Just as people are quick to say the RA outpeforms the EVO in no categories as well.
So it is faster in a straight line....one category. Stops slower, can;t turn as quick...two categories.

I like the car, just trying to justify the money for what I am getting.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 08:34 PM
  #24  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by dboz
Since I don't drag race the 1/4 mile times do not really matter. I do like going fast though.

Don't get me wrong. I like the RA. I realize that the RA is faster in a straight line. Just saying that to buy a new car that requires 2 sets of new tires (winter and summer) is a little tough to swallow. My point was that for AWD and then have the skidpad and braking be so bad, you are telling me the GTS has awesome performance tires? Why not put those on the RA then?

I think tires help, but those are some pretty big differences to just blame on tires. I do think the brakes are fade resistant though.
one of the best modification you can do for the first step as a track car. getting a better tires.
It does a multiple good changes on the car. Acceleration, breaking , cornering, what else modification does that besides the lightening up the car?
Do not under estimate the power of the tires.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #25  
hibby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by dboz
Head to head I think the GTS outperforms the RA in almost all categories.
It'll pull slightly more Gs on a skidpad, maybe. And it (maybe) slaloms a bit faster. What else can it beat the Ralliart in?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #26  
FLOW1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,640
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Yeah, my friend has one in White. It's QUICK.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #27  
Bawb3's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Youngstown, OH
Originally Posted by Mors
...you're talking about a car (GTS) that runs a 15.9 @ 88mph 1/4 mile as tested by R&T (16.5 @ 86.0 for the CVT ).
Don't forget the 17.8 sec PZEV CVT version! Woooo! ...I got screwed. For me the Ralliart would be an absolutely amazing difference.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 10:39 PM
  #28  
JoeyM3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: North San Diego
http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8282

from the 'other' evo forum
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 05:05 AM
  #29  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by JoeyM3
Yep that is my BUDDY stevo.
He is the one
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 06:05 AM
  #30  
dboz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Originally Posted by hibby
It'll pull slightly more Gs on a skidpad, maybe. And it (maybe) slaloms a bit faster. What else can it beat the Ralliart in?
PRICE!!!! and ECONOMY!! That is the point. With AWD it should kill it on the skidpad and in the slalom. Why make a PERFORMANCE car and through crap tires on it. How does the GTS have better skidpad and braking numbers. Braking by a large amount. Many cars go fast in a straight line including me 72 SKYLARK. But brakes and cornering suck. The RA is not that bad but it is not that good either. 3 of its competitors beat it in many performance categories, and they are all cheaper.

All I am saying is, that for the money I do not think the RA is a great deal. I like it and I may even get one. It is going to be a tough decision between the RA and the WRX. I wish I could wait until 2010 as I believe the RA will be better next year. But since I need a car in the next 4 months or so, the WRX is looking pretty good. As the last test showed. The RA averaged 17MPG while the WRX got 22. All things being equal, that is a big price difference over the long haul.

The performance numbers are not blowing me away on the RA. Is it good, YES. Is it great, NO. It is an above average car with a way above average price in its class.

On a good note. I do remember one test getting 26 MPG highway and about 18 city. I could live with that. WRX guys are getting 30 highway and 20+ city.

Last edited by dboz; Oct 11, 2008 at 06:08 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 PM.