EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)
-   09+ Lancer Ralliart General (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09-lancer-ralliart-general-266/)
-   -   Let's talk about mpg (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09-lancer-ralliart-general/588516-lets-talk-about-mpg.html)

masafina Dec 11, 2011 02:33 PM

Let's talk about mpg
 
First, sorry if I write something wrong, i'm not good with engl...

I read a lot here and I see how bad is the ralliart and evo in mpg and I see over the internet and magazines other cars with much more hp, bigger engine and have better mpg. I know that everybody gone say"tune", my cars is already tune, "stay out of boost" I do people and other things but thats not my point to write here.

What is wrong here, engine design???? Is just a question I have in my mind for a lot of time:crap:

A few examples:

Hyundai sonata turbo
2.0Lturbo 274hp 28mpg

Porche panamera turbo
4.8L twin turbo v8 23mpg

Ford edge ecoboost turbo
2.0L turbo 247hp 30mpg

Ford mustang N/A
v6 305hp 30mpg

Subaru wrx turbo
265hp 25mpg


and a lot of cars, you can search over the internet. So the point is, what wrong with :mitsu:

ExtremeDSM Dec 11, 2011 02:56 PM

We had 5 Evo's go to a track day, it was 800 ish miles round trip. Everyone got 25 to 27mpg on the hwy. We were not driving very nice either.

masafina Dec 11, 2011 03:06 PM


Originally Posted by ExtremeDSM (Post 9815038)
We had 5 Evo's go to a track day, it was 800 ish miles round trip. Everyone got 25 to 27mpg on the hwy. We were not driving very nice either.

evo x or viii and ix?

ExtremeDSM Dec 11, 2011 03:15 PM

They were 8's and 9's. I just noticed you were speaking of the x's and ralliart. Best I could get hwy out of my x was 25 and that was driving like a Nancy.

Live4Redline Dec 11, 2011 03:42 PM

My Evo 9 gets 32-34 mpg. Its all in the tune.

nunyas Dec 11, 2011 03:53 PM


Originally Posted by masafina (Post 9814993)
First, sorry if I write something wrong, i'm not good with engl...

I read a lot here and I see how bad is the ralliart and evo in mpg and I see over the internet and magazines other cars with much more hp, bigger engine and have better mpg. I know that everybody gone say"tune", my cars is already tune, "stay out of boost" I do people and other things but thats not my point to write here.

What is wrong here, engine design???? Is just a question I have in my mind for a lot of time:crap:

A few examples:

Hyundai sonata turbo
2.0Lturbo 274hp 28mpg

Porche panamera turbo
4.8L twin turbo v8 23mpg

Ford edge ecoboost turbo
2.0L turbo 247hp 30mpg

Ford mustang N/A
v6 305hp 30mpg

Subaru wrx turbo
265hp 25mpg


and a lot of cars, you can search over the internet. So the point is, what wrong with :mitsu:

What do you mean what's wrong? We get the same MPG as the Subaru WRX, and better than the Porsche Panamera Turbo...

The only one in that list that is comparable to the RA/EvoX in MPGs is the Subaru because both platforms are 4cylinder turbo w/ AWD.

The Ford Edge has better MPGs w/ its 2.0L turbo and AWD system because the engine is "Direct Injection" which allows even tighter control over fuel usage. Also, even though makes "240 HP and 270ft-lb torque" it doesn't really speak to how they've tuned the turbo from the factory...

masafina Dec 11, 2011 04:55 PM

Just put that cars for example, but the porshe panamera is just a few mpg away and have a v8 twin turbo 500hp, not a 4 with just 237hp

masafina Dec 11, 2011 04:56 PM


Originally Posted by Live4Redline (Post 9815135)
My Evo 9 gets 32-34 mpg. Its all in the tune.

If the ralliart can do that i will love forever

xi Dec 11, 2011 05:24 PM

Audi S4 V6 Stronic Quattro AWD - 333hp/325ftlbs, FOUR THOUSAND POUNDS, 28mpg.

Will probably end up being my next car after I've squeezed 120-140k miles out of the RA, even though I love my RA to death.

Because, AWD, 333hp, four thousand pounds 28mpg.

DuffmasterFresh Dec 11, 2011 05:31 PM

I am very concerned with the fuel economy as well. The turbo and AWD system are the culprits of sucking up the fuel of course. That and the tune finishes it off from the factory.

This begs the question, can a tuner adjust the RA to get better MPG? Is there a device where we can flip a switch and go from gas sipper to gas sipper?

petro Dec 12, 2011 12:54 AM


Originally Posted by DuffmasterFresh (Post 9815391)
I am very concerned with the fuel economy as well. The turbo and AWD system are the culprits of sucking up the fuel of course. That and the tune finishes it off from the factory.

This begs the question, can a tuner adjust the RA to get better MPG? Is there a device where we can flip a switch and go from gas sipper to gas sipper?


Ya...the Cobb AP.

masafina Dec 12, 2011 05:35 AM


Originally Posted by xi (Post 9815378)
Audi S4 V6 Stronic Quattro AWD - 333hp/325ftlbs, FOUR THOUSAND POUNDS, 28mpg.

Will probably end up being my next car after I've squeezed 120-140k miles out of the RA, even though I love my RA to death.

Because, AWD, 333hp, four thousand pounds 28mpg.


{thumbup} {thumbup} {thumbup} {thumbup} {thumbup}

NFSLancerRA Dec 12, 2011 06:53 AM


Originally Posted by DuffmasterFresh (Post 9815391)
This begs the question, can a tuner adjust the RA to get better MPG?

In a word, "yes".

FASTER345 Dec 12, 2011 09:08 AM

But then there goes your warranty...I know to most this is not an issue but this is my DD so I need to have it oem for many years to come. Sadly. I would LOVE a 32MPG tune!!!

NFSLancerRA Dec 12, 2011 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by FASTER345 (Post 9817022)
But then there goes your warranty.

Maybe. This depends on a number of factors. Probably yes, but you won't know until you ask.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:53 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands