Notices
AEM EMS Get tuning help for your AEM EMS system.

ems RETUNED!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #16  
Jack_Schitt's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by fromgsx2evo8
ok so i had the EMS installed and did 373whp360 on a dyno jet dyno.... was getting 130 miles to a tank... awsome i know. i thought there was a problem when i was trapping the same mph as ii was before the ems. Well thank god for precision dyno tuning about 1 mile from where i live cause they helped me out with a retune. ON AN AWD MUSTANG DYNO check out the air fuel from this tune this is the first pull on old tune thats what i went in on!http://home.comcast.net/~jbertsch1/TT_TUNE.bmp

now this is the retune! Precision Dyno Tunings Fix!!! Not only does the turbo spool insane fast but the car just flat out hauls!! will be going to the track next thursday to test her out!!! was told by the tuner that i should put out about 410whp on a dynojet. The guys at PD Tuning are great guys! thanks Nick... guys keep a look out for our cars in the very upcoming future!

justin
Was this tuned on pump gas or Race gas? Where is the new tuner located?
Reply
Old May 2, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #17  
Bom's Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
From: Philly/Jersey
Originally Posted by DCSilvrEvo
why not just get a ATP Turbo kit to keep building or your done?
I know my goal is 450WHP
you don't need an atp turbo when u can use your choice of t3/t4 turbo and choice of external wastegate.


Precision is located in Moorestown, NJ
about 5 minutes from exit 4 on the Nj turnpike.
Reply
Old May 2, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #18  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Turbo Trixx did the 1st tune? Not sure what was going on with your car, more details?
Reply
Old May 2, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #19  
Bom's Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
From: Philly/Jersey
ttr did the first tune. i just arrived there when they were strapping down justin's car. PD Tuning did a baseline pull with the w/b from the mustang dyno. what # did you get on the dynojet? i just want to see the difference bet. dyno's.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 07:27 AM
  #20  
fromgsx2evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: jersey
my baseline pull on the mustang dyno was 294 i left with 330.... I did not start these threads to start a fight between the two tuners..... i have no problems with turbo trix. Keith is a real good guy helped me out alot!!! If anyone i dont care who you are brought your car to a tuner had it tuned then a month and half later brought it to a different tuner/dyno and that tuner said you could get more power wouldnnt you want that.... I am only trying to get the most power possible!!! Some peope take this as talking Sh*t. i dont see how. This is a forum board put here to post up stuff like this... all i am saying to those doubting and gettiing all pissy over threads that SHOW FACTS..... grow up. No need to get all in an uproar!!
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #21  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Jeez... 294 is only like 20 whp more than me with my listed mods and 19psi instead of 20psi.... glad you got the tune fixed up... I would hope a FMIC, Intake, lower intercooler pipe, and 272 cams would yield more than 20 whp.... and yes, I was dynoed on a Mustang too... did you say yet what octane gas you were using both times?
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:06 PM
  #22  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by fromgsx2evo8
ok so i had the EMS installed and did 373whp360 on a dyno jet dyno....
Mustang Dyno recorded only 289HP and 290 TQ on the same tune that the Dyno Jet recorded 373/360? That's a 23% drop, which is far more than the typical difference reported between these two different dynos. I suspect that there was something else going on when you made your first pull that contributed to the low numbers. The original Dyno Jet graph with AFR would help to identify any differences. What octane were you using for both tuning sessions?

Final tune looks nice and numbers are more consistent with what you did on the Dyno Jet. However, I doubt that your current mods will put you in 410 territory on any Dyno.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #23  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
29% Drop
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #24  
fromgsx2evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: jersey
Originally Posted by Jack_Schitt
Was this tuned on pump gas or Race gas? Where is the new tuner located?
this was done on 93 octane...

the high numbers from TT were raace gas.... i did 340 i believe on pump there....
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #25  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by umiami80
29% Drop
29% would be correct if the test was accurate from the dynojet. But as Justin stated the 373 was done on race gas.
The car came in with pump gas and the tune was 340 on the dynojet.
So the percent decrease is on the money.

Last edited by Precision Dyno; May 3, 2005 at 08:51 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 08:42 PM
  #26  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
doh
Reply
Old May 8, 2005 | 11:09 AM
  #27  
EVOLUTIONIZE's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Miami
what is the correct difference between the 2? 17%?
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 PM.