Notices
Automotosports - Illinois Automotosports is a Chicago based tuner specializing in 4G63T performance. With an in-house fabrication facility and engineers on staff, they will be bringing you the best in Lancer Evolution parts.

37r Dynographs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 12:25 AM
  #16  
RREvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Jax
For drag and highway pulls Ill say the 2.0L is more suited.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 01:44 AM
  #17  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
Originally Posted by RREvo
For drag and highway pulls Ill say the 2.0L is more suited.
+100 since the 2.0 allow you to rev higher.You should also look into 2.1(2.4 block with overbore piston,long rod and 4G63 Crank).
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 04:24 AM
  #18  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by LetItBreath
I plan on building a 2.3/35r for my 9 when i get it.
+1 me too
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:34 AM
  #19  
ibanez_926's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
*Edited for Scorke*

Last edited by ibanez_926; Jun 29, 2006 at 07:55 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:38 AM
  #20  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
^ Dude are you joking. Did you draw those graphs in paint or did you get your 8 year old to do that for you????

Look at the numbers at the top of those graphs and look at the amount its making on the plot.....

Scorke
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:42 AM
  #21  
LetItBreath's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: City O Sin, MA...the not so sinish part though...
you bastard, lol. All I could see was the top of the chart and I got all excited, then I see this giant bold black line and the red flags started goin up...
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:43 AM
  #22  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
I went with a 2.3/GT35R making almost 700AWHP>
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:45 AM
  #23  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
The best part is how in the top one he coudlnt remember where the tq and hp lines crossed, so he decided to leave them on top of each other for 500 rpm or so haha.... looking at the graph it happens at 5k, which is mathematically impossible, so it must be true..... Also the amount of spool up (tq) would be greater all through out the rev range and it would make a lil more hp up until whatever it makes full boost at, at which point they should be about equal.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:46 AM
  #24  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Sharkbite where is the sheet, and for once you didnt post, "On the stock turbo I made 400/500..."

Scorke
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:50 AM
  #25  
DCSilvrEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 1
From: Hyattsville MD
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000
I went with a 2.3/GT35R making almost 700AWHP>
Where is ur dyno chart?
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:59 AM
  #26  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
for a 35R Car I would run the 2.3. You are not going to have to shift out of 4th crossing the beams so why not spool it quicker, make more torque and have a much more fun car on the street.

For a 37R Its a toss up, but if you want to spin the hell out of it the 2.0 might be a better choice considering dan was hitting the rev limiter in 4th as he would cross through the traps.

Eric
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 07:12 AM
  #27  
ibanez_926's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
dam scorke settle down.

Of course they are fake and done in paint

I was just trying to get people to use some imagination
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #28  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
^ Sorry, I just know some guy is going to post going, waaaaaaaaaaaaa the 37R only made 690 whp, they say it can make more, why would you buy it, and on and on and on, I just wanted to establish the fact that your plots are 1. Fake and 2. Unaccurate. Posting up dynosheets you come up with in MS Paint is hardly the way to help somebody out..... sorry. Waiting till AMS posts up actual hard numbers is a much better idea....

Scorke
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 07:18 AM
  #29  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
im going to dig up Dan's Dynograph from him making just over 700 whp.

Later on this week we have a built 2.0 getting tuned too. That I will post up when its done.

Eric
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 08:56 AM
  #30  
nickracer9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: WA
this thread is about the 37r, not the 35r. make a new thread if you have questions about it!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 AM.