Strokers - 2.3l vs 2.4l
"revving high" is something you should worry about with your head. if your bottom end is bullet-proof it doesnt matter that you spin it to 20,000rpm, the reason you dont is because the motor is out of its VE. a 2.4l on the 63 block is all about moving more air down low, a built 2.0 is about moving air up top.
[QUOTE=crcain;5058440]No disrespect intended because AMS seems to be a solid company. My AMS turbo kit has never skipped a beat for the last 2 years.
But is the 2.3RR just running a custom crank, rods, and pistons in a 4G64? Is that some sort of special feat in engineering? Why all the hype?
QUOTE]
Exacly my point... Brand name road racing machine shops can tell you TONS of information on racing tricks that build those bulletproof blocks.
Destroke a galant motor or outlander motor, add a trick crank, proper correct rods and etc., etc., etc..
Basically all this is is a glammed destroked 2.4 with high compression.
Which allows you to rev the bottom end to the upper 8k's-low 9k's.
Since you still have more displacement over a 2.0 you still get the added tq from a stroked motor.
The high compression allows you to run less boost and the same ammount of power as a fully stroked motor.
I applaud AMS for bring this to the masses but then I don't... It is forward movement for the community but now I have to deal with a level playing ground when I hit the track with the ammount of people sprinting to get this engine.
But is the 2.3RR just running a custom crank, rods, and pistons in a 4G64? Is that some sort of special feat in engineering? Why all the hype?
QUOTE]
Exacly my point... Brand name road racing machine shops can tell you TONS of information on racing tricks that build those bulletproof blocks.
Destroke a galant motor or outlander motor, add a trick crank, proper correct rods and etc., etc., etc..
Basically all this is is a glammed destroked 2.4 with high compression.
Which allows you to rev the bottom end to the upper 8k's-low 9k's.
Since you still have more displacement over a 2.0 you still get the added tq from a stroked motor.
The high compression allows you to run less boost and the same ammount of power as a fully stroked motor.
I applaud AMS for bring this to the masses but then I don't... It is forward movement for the community but now I have to deal with a level playing ground when I hit the track with the ammount of people sprinting to get this engine.
the hype is that it works better than a normal 2.3 stroker. you make it sound like this motor is just slapped together. there is alot of time that goes into this thing. oh and by the way since you think i should "join the club" why dont you tell me some of accomplishments you've had with your motor that is somehow exactly the same as ours. im sure some people would love to hear them.
Let's see your calculatoring, then ... 'cuz any way I add it up, the 8K price tag doesn't seem bad, considering that there is no core exchange for the 2.3RR. If you can sell your old block for $3K, then you're down to a total cost of 5K.
l8r)
l8r)



If your so damn sharp sounds like you should have your own ams shop you tool! 
