Notices

COBB stage 1 vs Perrin stage 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 12:01 PM
  #1  
mattnshell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
COBB stage 1 vs Perrin stage 1

trying to feel this one out. i am wanting to buy a stage 1 kit but cant decide on perrin or cobb. each one is the same 449.00 price point and each one says around 15%hp increase. so i want some feedback from you all who are seasoned at this.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 01:26 PM
  #2  
Scottishsamurai's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
I'm right there with you bro, but I was between the Cobb AP or Tactrix Openport 2.0
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 06:18 PM
  #3  
jdizzle37's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 132
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
The Perrin Stage 1 uses a Cobb V2 AP with a map optimized for a Perrin drop-in filter. The Cobb AP itself has several maps up to 3 stages with maps optimized for either ACN 91, 91, or 93 octane fuels built-in based on your vehicle year.

2008-2010 Stage 1 maps are intended for stock cars with only an intake and Cobb currently supports the stock, Cobb SF, AEM, AMS, Injen and HKS intakes for those years. The 2011+ GSR and MR Stage 1 maps are for COMPLETELY STOCK cars.

Personally, I think the staging order for the 2011+ maps are better. I like the pathway better:
- Stock
- Stage 1 (optimized stock)
- Stage 2 (add turbo-back exhaust)
- Stage 3 (add SF intake and 3-port solenoid)
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 06:23 AM
  #4  
mattnshell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
think i have decided to buy the new v3 when released in early sept. after reading ur posts and reading else where COBB is the way to go
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 08:27 AM
  #5  
trick3d's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Neither, get a custom dyno tune or e-tune by a tuner who is reputable on the Evo X platform.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 10:53 AM
  #6  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Of the two, I'd take Cobb. Perrin seems to have forgotten all about the Evo X which is too bad since I liked their parts I had on my IX.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 12:16 PM
  #7  
jdizzle37's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 132
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Agreed. It baffles me that Cobb gets criticized for lack of Evo X support. I think the new V3 Accessport is plenty of proof that they still recognize the market.

I'll share that one of the reasons I like Cobb's off the shelf maps is that I can do a lot of bolt-on modifications without worrying about getting tuned right away. I know that a custom tune will yield more gain as these OTS maps are fairly conservative. In the long run I'll eventually need a custom tune once other turbos and manifolds are put into play, but the idea of not needing as many retunes is appealing to a fellow like me who would rather up the power in manageable increments.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
haxr303
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
1
Oct 1, 2015 09:20 AM
EEVOH
Northeast Region
2
Aug 27, 2015 07:02 PM
EEVOH
For Sale - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
5
Aug 27, 2015 07:01 PM
awdfun
Cobb AccessPORT
1
Feb 9, 2014 11:41 AM
4G63kevin
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
6
May 6, 2010 10:21 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 PM.