Congrats! Glad you guys got the times you were aiming for.

 

Congrats for 10.81!!

 

wow......awesome run. congrats .

 

Great job from the OK team - now please get that garage / dyno queen Gt37 monster to the track!

Al

 

Congrats, nice talking to you at the track. Can't wait until next year? I'll try to be a little more prepare next year.

 

Thanks you all hopefully we can keep pecking off some more time. This setup keeps surprising me more and more.



Thanks Al!

 

if you look around there are a few pictures of it on this link

http://www.flickr.com/photos/15059459@N02/page3/

 

Great job!

 

Very nice
Doesnt TTP have the record for the fastest stock ecu 8 on stock turbo at 10.92@129?

 

I'll repeat TTP-ENG when he said, 'When we see what the mods and times were, straight from the horses mouth, we'll believe them' . Curt Brown holds the record on both stock turbo and 20G-LT using an AEM. I've heard and received many PM's concerning the 10.92 TTP-Engineering run. Everything from no MAF, nitrous, nitromethane, etc, etc. When TTP-Engineering states what the car had, I'll believe him, but until then, I'll have and asterisk in my mind on his MPH record.

 

You can run speed density on stock ECU.

We ran with MAF for our back to back 10.94, 10.92.

Fuel type is irrelevent.

 

Then that's it. I knew that speed density could be run on the stock ecu, but didn't think anyone had done it back when your runs were made. As for the fuel, I agree. Why would anyone build a motor/race car and then cut back on the fuel. I use whatever fuel will get the max out of the tune and the job it's going to do. Good job on the runs.

 

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=162727

Oct 6, 2005.

Still irrelevent since we used the stock MAF on those runs in Karman Vortex mode.

 

128 or 129 fastest trap is irrelevant- ttp had those traps 2 years ago but also stayed very hush about his setup back then - its good to see you listing your mods so the average evo owner has a path for a 10 second car with stock appeal- cause most of us dont have the resources or money as a shop owner for trial and error.

either way both have braggin rights but congrats are due to the new comer!

 

Thanks. The obvious differences now, vs then, is the Evo IX's 4th gear. The IX is known to have 'same times' at 3 -4 mph lower trap speeds. The OKIX car is at Buschur Racing to build a reliable 2.0, (forged internals, stock size valves and springs), and adding the taller 4th gear. When that is completed, the mph records will also fall. We're basically 1 - 2 mph short now, but our speeds are above the norm for a IX. The TTP car's mph record is for a STOCK type turbo. That's what makes it note worthy. The OKIX car is a STOCK TYPE, but 20G-LT, not a stock IX turbo. Thanks to TTP for the add'l info.