Went to the track
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 2
From: Port Arthur, TX
but from the last time i went to the track to now things have changed alot. I'm kinda iffy about my trap speed but i geuss its right .
Old timeslip
Cant find the other was 12.9@107
Old timeslip

Cant find the other was 12.9@107
Last edited by kaonashi; Oct 29, 2007 at 10:42 AM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 2
From: Port Arthur, TX
Im on 93 octane, BUT im having a boost creep issue, and from 6500-7k its raising to 25 by the time i shift so its actually boosting a tad bit more then i want too.
So basically im running 23psi and it holds 23 until 6500 then starts to raise, but ive been shifting right before it hits 25 so id say 24.5ish hard to catch it
Ohh just to add, it was approx 58 degree's outside with 37% humidity so that helped out alot, but didnt help the creep any
So basically im running 23psi and it holds 23 until 6500 then starts to raise, but ive been shifting right before it hits 25 so id say 24.5ish hard to catch it
Ohh just to add, it was approx 58 degree's outside with 37% humidity so that helped out alot, but didnt help the creep any
Last edited by kaonashi; Oct 29, 2007 at 10:59 AM.
on the 11.8@119 pass your 330' and 1000' times seem waaaaaaay off but the launch and trap speed are great. With that launch and trap though you should be in the mid 11s.
On my 12.0x passes my 330' is generally 4.9ish and my 1000' is generally 10.05ish
On my 12.0x passes my 330' is generally 4.9ish and my 1000' is generally 10.05ish
Yeah, the numbers don't add up at all, and 119 on 93 with boost CREEPING is much more likely to blow the engine or at least cause knock that kills top end. It would not have the reverse effect of making it faster than a 20g-LT equipped Evo. Most 20G IXs don't trap this on 93, so it doesn't add up. However, the 11.84 is very believable with that 60' and those mods with maybe a 115mph trap.
For reference, like mcwop said, the splits just don't make sense. My 12.000 @ 113 was quicker than you to the 1/8th with MUCH less MPH and only a slightly better 60'. I had a 7.63 @ 90. Also, my 330' was 4.94, and yours says 5.3?? No way.
For reference, like mcwop said, the splits just don't make sense. My 12.000 @ 113 was quicker than you to the 1/8th with MUCH less MPH and only a slightly better 60'. I had a 7.63 @ 90. Also, my 330' was 4.94, and yours says 5.3?? No way.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 2
From: Port Arthur, TX
I think their track is FUXORED UP, ill be heading to HRP this coming up weekend, because i dont believe thats very accurate myself. That was the only pass i made before they kicked me out lol
I just talked to some of my friends that go there and they said that their track is off alot he said in general their trap speed is off alot
Which i ran a 12.9@108 awhile back and someone had said that the trap was high then too
I just talked to some of my friends that go there and they said that their track is off alot he said in general their trap speed is off alot
Which i ran a 12.9@108 awhile back and someone had said that the trap was high then too
Last edited by kaonashi; Oct 30, 2007 at 01:29 PM.
[QUOTE=Warrtalon;4901483]Yeah, the numbers don't add up at all, and 119 on 93 with boost CREEPING is much more likely to blow the engine or at least cause knock that kills top end. It would not have the reverse effect of making it faster than a 20g-LT equipped Evo. Most 20G IXs don't trap this on 93, so it doesn't add up. However, the 11.84 is very believable with that 60' and those mods with maybe a 115mph trap.For reference, like mcwop said, the splits just don't make sense. My 12.000 @ 113 was quicker than you to the 1/8th with MUCH less MPH and only a slightly better 60'. I had a 7.63 @ 90. Also, my 330' was 4.94, and yours says 5.3?? No way.that 12.0 is getting old
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
nice trap!
I just went:
1.67
11.91
114 mph
1/8th was 7.58 @ 90mph
93 octane and bald street tires.
video: http://www.racevideoforums.com/forum...ead.php?t=2793
there's probably a little more in it, I had 4 runs and picked up 1mph in each of the last 3 tweaking the tune.
I just went:
1.67
11.91
114 mph
1/8th was 7.58 @ 90mph
93 octane and bald street tires.
video: http://www.racevideoforums.com/forum...ead.php?t=2793
there's probably a little more in it, I had 4 runs and picked up 1mph in each of the last 3 tweaking the tune.
nice trap!
I just went:
1.67
11.91
114 mph
1/8th was 7.58 @ 90mph
93 octane and bald street tires.
video: http://www.racevideoforums.com/forum...ead.php?t=2793
there's probably a little more in it, I had 4 runs and picked up 1mph in each of the last 3 tweaking the tune.
I just went:
1.67
11.91
114 mph
1/8th was 7.58 @ 90mph
93 octane and bald street tires.
video: http://www.racevideoforums.com/forum...ead.php?t=2793
there's probably a little more in it, I had 4 runs and picked up 1mph in each of the last 3 tweaking the tune.
I RAN THE SAME TIME AS YOU!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SlowCar
Water / Methanol Injection / Nitrous Oxide
150
Jul 5, 2008 10:38 AM








