Just a thought, but rather then just going by ET vs WHP people should add in there MPH as MPH is a direct indication of hp. ET will be all over the place due to driving skills and such. Just a thought.

 

12.21 @112mph with a 1.705 60ft - 316whp on a Dynojet (full weight minus spare tire)

 

So is that like 370whp on a DJ?

 

Well, ask yourself...."could i trap 120mph on a 3400 pound car with 370awhp?"...

The answer is probably not...

Also i would agree with the friend who noted to use trap speeds instead of ETs... If the car has the power even if the driver is not a really good one the car will trap the speed is supposed to...

 

11.48@119.1-with375whp mustang dyno

 

I have to see how much i'll make on that dyno

 

+1

I think it should also be clear if it was a Dynojet, Mustang dyno, or dynodynamics (including correction)..

This extra bit of info levels the playing field a bit.

 

Wich reads lower? My understanding the mustang reads the lowest?

 

11.5-477hp winter tires

 

I did 10.98 at 123 mph with 510whp/483 tq "FP RED"

 

pump gas ?

 

12.95 @ 106.32mph stock HP.. time is in the sig.

 

bump updated

don't be shy guys.

 

DYNOJET
10.21@133 1.396 60' 468whp (stock turbo)
9.53@145 1.398 60' 631whp (FP RED)

You should list mph too. ET can change quite a bit with so many variables..

 

12.0 @ 114
290 whp CBRD mustang dyno
full weight, stock clutch w/ 54k