Notices
Drag Racing Find out the best way to launch and see what kind of times other people are posting. No posting of street racing related stories!

2.0 vs 2.2 for Drag race

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 07:12 PM
  #1  
unknown2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
2.0 vs 2.2 for Drag race

I hope this is in the right section.

I have seached and seached and i can't find anything why people don't use a stroked motor for drag racing. I'm doing a 6262 pte Turbo and just want to know what would be better for drag racing hy.

Thanks
Bob
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #2  
McLaren F1 2003's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
i would say a built 2.0 would be better for drag.

you want top end for drag and with a 2.0, youll be able to rev higher which is what will keep a big turbo like the 6262 in its powerband
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 05:16 AM
  #3  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Because when you increase the stroke of the crank, you increase piston speed, which limits your max rpm. With turbos like a 6262, they make a lot hp in high rpm, and that means good 1/4 mile time.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 08:49 AM
  #4  
4u2nvme's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Definately a 2.0...Even a 2.1
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 01:36 AM
  #5  
Gump's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: FL
For many its a preference. As has been mentioned some really like to stretch the rpm band and it is not uncommon to see many 2.0L engines running into the 10k band.

For those like me who seem unable to master the concept of the no lift shift strokers prove to be a bit more forgiving in that I don't drop out of the power curve as quickly.

When you get into the power ranges that bring our cars into the 9sec time period your really talking more about the drivers skill and style than the displacement of the engine if all else is equal.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 03:09 AM
  #6  
_DEN_'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Russia
I know crazy guy who has an evo7 with 2400cc engine (100mm stroke) revving up to 9500.
His best 1/4 result is 8.89sec (163mph)
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #7  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
same as what crcrain said... except that he forgot to mention that horsepower is directly proportionaly to acceleration...and therefore by increasing the point at which peak ve occurs you can make more power.

the "2.1L" has the same 88mm stroke as the 2.0L 4g63, but also has a taller deck with improves the rod to stroke ratio, which reduces the stress on the shortblock components.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #8  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Bigger displacement, like a 2.3 ultimately shines on road racing circuits, right? Where a solid amount of lower/midrange power is favored.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #9  
d1esel's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Auckland / NZ
I've got a 2.2L stroked engine.. its certainly got what it takes for drag racing..
check out my garage pictures..
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 05:47 PM
  #10  
DOMINIC1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Tempe AZ
Check out the long rod 2.1...you can read about it on dsm-tuners.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 08:58 PM
  #11  
MIGHTYMOUSE1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Bronx N.Y
2.0 ftw
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 03:13 AM
  #12  
EVO-EVO-EVO's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Ozamis City, Philippines
Exclamation I say 2.2L after seeing this!

This guy is doing REALY good with a 2.2L!

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/dr...0-163-mph.html
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 04:32 AM
  #13  
metalsaber's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 2
From: The Sticks
Originally Posted by Svendiesel
Bigger displacement, like a 2.3 ultimately shines on road racing circuits, right? Where a solid amount of lower/midrange power is favored.
Correct. More torque/whp down low is important to road racing.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #14  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Look at all that torque that F1 cars make down low...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #15  
dambikeracer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Denver
2.0, 2.1, or 2.2 you cant go wrong with the right set up!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:26 PM.