Top 20 Fastest/Quickest Stock Appearing Turbos for 2011
Account Disabled
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: Clinton, NJ - Myrtle Beach, SC
the VDR stuff is way off when people compare it to our dyno-
ive seen a difference of 150whp LOL!
why dont you bring your car here- baseline it again- and we can compare it immediately to your VDR setup? since I never use it-
Im not sure Grant ran VDR immediately after it was tuned-
either way- he can wheel a car down the track- and if we make 900whp here shortly- I think Ill have him drive our customers car
cb
ive seen a difference of 150whp LOL!
why dont you bring your car here- baseline it again- and we can compare it immediately to your VDR setup? since I never use it-
Im not sure Grant ran VDR immediately after it was tuned-
either way- he can wheel a car down the track- and if we make 900whp here shortly- I think Ill have him drive our customers car
cb
I would like to see the results from this as well...
the VDR stuff is way off when people compare it to our dyno-
ive seen a difference of 150whp LOL!
why dont you bring your car here- baseline it again- and we can compare it immediately to your VDR setup? since I never use it-
Im not sure Grant ran VDR immediately after it was tuned-
either way- he can wheel a car down the track- and if we make 900whp here shortly- I think Ill have him drive our customers car
cb
ive seen a difference of 150whp LOL!
why dont you bring your car here- baseline it again- and we can compare it immediately to your VDR setup? since I never use it-
Im not sure Grant ran VDR immediately after it was tuned-
either way- he can wheel a car down the track- and if we make 900whp here shortly- I think Ill have him drive our customers car
cb
Chad, we do have the ability to perform a comparison test and look at the delta with my car currently being onsite at CBRD. I've used the VDR program in the past. Plus, since I am in TN i don't have the convience of your heartbreaker dyno to test future gains. It would be nice to get a baseline from the two initially. I'm sure Chris would be on board cause he uses VDR as well. That would be two test with an X and a XI. Thoughts?
Sorry to clog the thread..
Can't wait to pilot that car
VDR was done a few weeks after, in much more favorable conditions aka less then half of the air temp and humidity then when at CBRD.
If it was done back to back I would guess a 15-18% differential. Using VDR as a tuning tool back to back on the same stretch of road was helpful to me on several occasions. It should never be used in comparison with another dynamometer.
Maybe I'll head throw e85 in the mix and head south??
Can't wait to pilot that car
VDR was done a few weeks after, in much more favorable conditions aka less then half of the air temp and humidity then when at CBRD.
If it was done back to back I would guess a 15-18% differential. Using VDR as a tuning tool back to back on the same stretch of road was helpful to me on several occasions. It should never be used in comparison with another dynamometer.
Maybe I'll head throw e85 in the mix and head south??
Depends which vdr you use. You also have to be sure you enter all the appropriate information like tire diameter and weight correctly. On AMSs dynojet I put down 508 and the VD showed 490. Pretty close I think
the VDR stuff is way off when people compare it to our dyno-
ive seen a difference of 150whp LOL!
why dont you bring your car here- baseline it again- and we can compare it immediately to your VDR setup? since I never use it-
Im not sure Grant ran VDR immediately after it was tuned-
either way- he can wheel a car down the track- and if we make 900whp here shortly- I think Ill have him drive our customers car
cb
ive seen a difference of 150whp LOL!
why dont you bring your car here- baseline it again- and we can compare it immediately to your VDR setup? since I never use it-
Im not sure Grant ran VDR immediately after it was tuned-
either way- he can wheel a car down the track- and if we make 900whp here shortly- I think Ill have him drive our customers car
cb
i can do pulls on the way there on 30w then we can dyno and compare to graph.. would be interesting for sure. im guessing its within 12-15% of dynojet mode. we can compare mustang mode also.
Honto / 11/20/2011 / Self Built / Evo 8 / FP Green, 2.0, Pump + Meth, HKS 272, MAF / 129.06
I was spinning pretty bad first gear and slow shifting the 1-2 to avoid a miss shift. I was in the 11.50 index for Import vs Domestic at Atco. Great day of racing and I'm very pleased with my traps as I have a set of kelford 272's to go in. Hopefully starting next season with some FD/QTP's and more power.
I was spinning pretty bad first gear and slow shifting the 1-2 to avoid a miss shift. I was in the 11.50 index for Import vs Domestic at Atco. Great day of racing and I'm very pleased with my traps as I have a set of kelford 272's to go in. Hopefully starting next season with some FD/QTP's and more power.
Last edited by kanyonkid; Nov 26, 2011 at 07:08 PM.
Account Disabled
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: Clinton, NJ - Myrtle Beach, SC
Wrong list but great job man!! That is a badass MPH!! Are you really still running a stock IX turbo???
Just went to the track, have a pair to add to the list.
Thank you
Boosted91t / 11/19/2011 / Self built / Evo 8 / FP Black, Built 2.0, 93 octane, CBRD tuned / 10.916 ET
Boosted91t / 11/19/2011 / Self built / Evo 8 / FP Black, Built 2.0, 93 octane, CBRD tuned / 129.11 MPH
Thank you
Boosted91t / 11/19/2011 / Self built / Evo 8 / FP Black, Built 2.0, 93 octane, CBRD tuned / 10.916 ET
Boosted91t / 11/19/2011 / Self built / Evo 8 / FP Black, Built 2.0, 93 octane, CBRD tuned / 129.11 MPH
sure i could do that. just bolted the turbo back up and need to run a water pressure gauge then troubleshoot something then i will contact you.
i can do pulls on the way there on 30w then we can dyno and compare to graph.. would be interesting for sure. im guessing its within 12-15% of dynojet mode. we can compare mustang mode also.
i can do pulls on the way there on 30w then we can dyno and compare to graph.. would be interesting for sure. im guessing its within 12-15% of dynojet mode. we can compare mustang mode also.
well we have one of the cars on the list that was almost identical in trap speed and ET. donkeypuncher ran it at 10.89@129.5. he is also full weight, and cut around a 1.5 60ft.
his whp on our mustang dyno was 470whp. if this car is showing 575whp VDR, and trapped an identical speed, i would say the VDR is a good 22% higher then our dyno.
i would imagine if you dynoed again on CBRDs dyno it will still be mid/high 400's. no doubt still impressive for pump though.
Well I just stepped in from the track, what a day.
I have some new #'s to add to the list...I finally got into the 10's
raasfaas / 11/27/11 / SpeedShop (Jamaica) / Evo 9 / FP RED, stock block, S2s, QTPs, 6 spd / 31psi / 10.901@131.07
I have some new #'s to add to the list...I finally got into the 10's
raasfaas / 11/27/11 / SpeedShop (Jamaica) / Evo 9 / FP RED, stock block, S2s, QTPs, 6 spd / 31psi / 10.901@131.07
well we have one of the cars on the list that was almost identical in trap speed and ET. donkeypuncher ran it at 10.89@129.5. he is also full weight, and cut around a 1.5 60ft.
his whp on our mustang dyno was 470whp. if this car is showing 575whp VDR, and trapped an identical speed, i would say the VDR is a good 22% higher then our dyno.
i would imagine if you dynoed again on CBRDs dyno it will still be mid/high 400's. no doubt still impressive for pump though.
his whp on our mustang dyno was 470whp. if this car is showing 575whp VDR, and trapped an identical speed, i would say the VDR is a good 22% higher then our dyno.
i would imagine if you dynoed again on CBRDs dyno it will still be mid/high 400's. no doubt still impressive for pump though.
Kevin:
i can show a handful of other cars that show vd doesnt bloat numbers also.. and hopefully mine will be one of them soon here.. but in all fairness mustangs do range in various percentages. i used one that read 20% lower then a dynojet 5min away.. i have no idea how yours reads but lets not assume 128-129mph is all that 575hp has to offer in vd in dj mode.. i can show proof that is not the case on multiple cars.
when i dynoed at CBRD 2yrs ago it made 522 with restrictive parts (fmic, etc) at 39psi.. which came out to 580 in vd.. thats roughly 12%.
i still have all data and logs as well from it.. from what i understand CBRD dyno reads dead on the money what a real working mustang should be doing..
i can show a handful of other cars that show vd doesnt bloat numbers also.. and hopefully mine will be one of them soon here.. but in all fairness mustangs do range in various percentages. i used one that read 20% lower then a dynojet 5min away.. i have no idea how yours reads but lets not assume 128-129mph is all that 575hp has to offer in vd in dj mode.. i can show proof that is not the case on multiple cars.
when i dynoed at CBRD 2yrs ago it made 522 with restrictive parts (fmic, etc) at 39psi.. which came out to 580 in vd.. thats roughly 12%.
i still have all data and logs as well from it.. from what i understand CBRD dyno reads dead on the money what a real working mustang should be doing..
Account Disabled
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: Clinton, NJ - Myrtle Beach, SC
Great job man! List will be updated later today! So are you still stain in 4th? I know you said you switched to a taller tire to get more MPH out of each gear. Also, what fuel are you using, I can't remember?