My time with stock turbo!!!
give you an idea. When Buschur ran their 11.65 time with stock turbo they had a 1.6 60' time. Doing that they were a sub 3 sec 0-60 time. They also trapped almost 118 MPH
Look at Vette's and LS1's, they run like 12's at 110 or so (slighlty modded) but you can do it at 105MPH or less, traction i sKing...
Originally posted by umiami80
The lower your 60' time, the lower your trap can be with with low ET's. For some amazing reason for nailing a 1.2, I believe a 11 second 1/4, as he is so far down the track in such a short time, there is less space for achieveing speed.
Look at Vette's and LS1's, they run like 12's at 110 or so (slighlty modded) but you can do it at 105MPH or less, traction i sKing...
The lower your 60' time, the lower your trap can be with with low ET's. For some amazing reason for nailing a 1.2, I believe a 11 second 1/4, as he is so far down the track in such a short time, there is less space for achieveing speed.
Look at Vette's and LS1's, they run like 12's at 110 or so (slighlty modded) but you can do it at 105MPH or less, traction i sKing...
thats funny sh#t. I dont care what the time slip shows, there is no way in hell that you pulled an 1.2 60' ahhaahahaha. I go to the track pretty often and I have never seen a full bodied car do a 1.2 60'. the timing system had to have been messed up.
Originally posted by EvolvedDSM
Not to mention the 1.5 60' time from the 13 sec guy in the other lane. You sure you guys weren't staging the rear tires
Not to mention the 1.5 60' time from the 13 sec guy in the other lane. You sure you guys weren't staging the rear tires
Nice spot.
And the timeslip makes much more sense if you change the 1's to 2's. a 2.2 60' 12.8 @ 109mph.
and you mph is way low for what you have.
Last edited by rACerS; Apr 3, 2004 at 07:25 PM.
Guys it was a faulty timing system. I was at Great Lakes today as well. Check out the thread: Unreal Timeslip? for more details on my situation as well. Mine may be a little more realistic but I'm still skeptical... 
