Account Disabled
Quote:
give you an idea. When Buschur ran their 11.65 time with stock turbo they had a 1.6 60' time. Doing that they were a sub 3 sec 0-60 time. They also trapped almost 118 MPH
The lower your 60' time, the lower your trap can be with with low ET's. For some amazing reason for nailing a 1.2, I believe a 11 second 1/4, as he is so far down the track in such a short time, there is less space for achieveing speed.give you an idea. When Buschur ran their 11.65 time with stock turbo they had a 1.6 60' time. Doing that they were a sub 3 sec 0-60 time. They also trapped almost 118 MPH
Look at Vette's and LS1's, they run like 12's at 110 or so (slighlty modded) but you can do it at 105MPH or less, traction i sKing...
Evolved Member
Quote:
Originally posted by umiami80
The lower your 60' time, the lower your trap can be with with low ET's. For some amazing reason for nailing a 1.2, I believe a 11 second 1/4, as he is so far down the track in such a short time, there is less space for achieveing speed.
Look at Vette's and LS1's, they run like 12's at 110 or so (slighlty modded) but you can do it at 105MPH or less, traction i sKing...
Even so, there's no way he nailed a 1.2 60', it just doesn't happen, especially not on a car that supposedly runs 11s. That time slip is ****ed up all over the place. Put it down to faulty timing equipment.Originally posted by umiami80
The lower your 60' time, the lower your trap can be with with low ET's. For some amazing reason for nailing a 1.2, I believe a 11 second 1/4, as he is so far down the track in such a short time, there is less space for achieveing speed.
Look at Vette's and LS1's, they run like 12's at 110 or so (slighlty modded) but you can do it at 105MPH or less, traction i sKing...
Evolving Member
Not to mention the 1.5 60' time from the 13 sec guy in the other lane. You sure you guys weren't staging the rear tires 
Evolving Member
thats funny sh#t. I dont care what the time slip shows, there is no way in hell that you pulled an 1.2 60' ahhaahahaha. I go to the track pretty often and I have never seen a full bodied car do a 1.2 60'. the timing system had to have been messed up.
Evolving Member
Quote:
Originally posted by EvolvedDSM
Not to mention the 1.5 60' time from the 13 sec guy in the other lane. You sure you guys weren't staging the rear tires
Originally posted by EvolvedDSM
Not to mention the 1.5 60' time from the 13 sec guy in the other lane. You sure you guys weren't staging the rear tires
Nice spot.
And the timeslip makes much more sense if you change the 1's to 2's. a 2.2 60' 12.8 @ 109mph.
and you mph is way low for what you have.
Evolved Member
Guys it was a faulty timing system. I was at Great Lakes today as well. Check out the thread: Unreal Timeslip? for more details on my situation as well. Mine may be a little more realistic but I'm still skeptical... 
Evolved Member
Hey guys....the horse is dead now...you can quit kicking it.
Newbie
Quote:
Originally posted by umiami80
Did you get rear ended by a Semi doing 80? That may explaint it.
I guess it is those Evo 7 Tails....
AHHAAHAH. funny guy Originally posted by umiami80
Did you get rear ended by a Semi doing 80? That may explaint it.
I guess it is those Evo 7 Tails....
Evolved Member
is it possible that when you hit 88 miles per hour you went back in time about 10.5 seconds to the 60' marker?