double clutching
Originally Posted by urbanknight
After reading all of these posts, I am even more confused as to the definition of double clutching than I was before reading it. Could someone who actually knows what they are talking about please give a side-by-side comparison between double clutching and rev matching, that way I know why they are apparently two completely different techniques for two different purposes... or are they?
When you upshift normally, the engine will drop speed. when you let the clutch out, you can naturally time it to engage at just the right time to give you a perfectly smooth shift. (say from 3rd to 4th, when the engine needs to drop 500rpm for a given speed).
Rev matching allows you to just the opposite, when you downshift. The engine needs to speed up instead of slow down. To do this, blip the throttle to speed up the engine when the clutch is disengaged. Shift to the lower gear. When you let the clutch out for the lower gear, the engine will be spinning at a higher rpm, (whatever is dictated by the lower gear) and you don't get the jerky lurch. This is the same "single-clutch downshift" BlackhawkRA was talking about.
Heel/toe is used to brake at the same time the above is being done. Your right foot presses on the brake pedal, and the side (or heel) of your foot swings over and blips the throttle to rev match. This is extremely useful on a track for getting into the right gear while you're braking into a corner. So, when you exit the corner, you're good to go, no more playing with the shifter.
Double clutching is much more technical, and it's only to prevent wear on the transmission during downshifts by engaging the clutch in neutral while the engine is rev matched. It is used with heel/toe braking and rev matching to allow the engine to speed up the first half of the tranny instead of it's internal synchros. High rev shifting (especially downshifting) causes excessive synchro wear.
Many racing transmissions or "dog boxes" won't have synchros, because they add weight, and its one more thing to go wrong. Those guys need to double clutch and rev match everything, which is good because it prevents disrupting the car's balance.
Originally Posted by blackhawkRA
Thanks for presenting a real question with a definite answer and not just a bunch of misrepresented opinions lead by a misunderstanding of the techniques being discussed.
I must correct you in one thing, though. In most autocross situations, you only shift once (1-2) then you never shift again. But in the few cases where you actually get up to 3rd (or if you're racing an AM car), I can see where that would come in handy)
Originally Posted by Wheelhaus
BlackhawkRA's post was very good , but for the ADD...
Originally Posted by urbanknight
I have come to the conclusion that rev matching is a part of the heel-toe and double-clutching techniques,
Originally Posted by urbanknight
and is virtually useless by itself (why would you need to rev match if you aren't changing speed?)
Once you fully grasp the technical ins and outs of just how a transmission works and just what's going on, only then double clutching will fully make sense.
Thanks Wheelhaus, that made complete sense. Even using rev matching without braking. I never stopped to realize that I do that frequently, going up hills, pasing lanes, etc. I spent most of today trying to heel toe while driving back from the beach. Thanks!
Originally Posted by ldstang50
no wonder you are still in the 13sec club
I've never even done it a track. I was presenting an alternative from racing from a roll while still in lag. That's all. I'm not saying "clinical studies have shown.....blah blah blah....."
Originally Posted by urbanknight
Thanks Wheelhaus, that made complete sense. Even using rev matching without braking. I never stopped to realize that I do that frequently, going up hills, pasing lanes, etc. I spent most of today trying to heel toe while driving back from the beach. Thanks!
Originally Posted by 86gti
lol double clutching
1) you dont need to do it, thats what synchros are for
2) dont do it
1) you dont need to do it, thats what synchros are for
2) dont do it
Why would you resurrect a good thread just to post crap like this? Read the thread and grow up.
It IS needed in some transmissions, not all are equipped with synchros. And in a synchro'd tranny, it still helps to reduce wear. which is ESPECIALLY a good idea considering the Evo tranny is prone to synchro and shifting problems. Besides, learning to do it can help to make you a better driver because you become more connected to the car.
lol is right. Have you ever rebuilt a gearbox? It's a bit of work (and expense) to go through just to replace synchros that could have been saved by matching. Two points extrapolated from my post here months ago:
1) If you rev-match downshift with the clutch disengaged (not a double clutch), you still don't match the input shaft and output shaft speeds. Remember the clutch plate is on the input shaft and needs to be accelerated by the engine itself.
2) Double clutching is not just for the track. It preserves synchros under proper street driving dramatically compared to not doing it. Even for hard steel, triple-cone pieces. This point amplifies when you have relatively weak synchros like our Evo units...
1) If you rev-match downshift with the clutch disengaged (not a double clutch), you still don't match the input shaft and output shaft speeds. Remember the clutch plate is on the input shaft and needs to be accelerated by the engine itself.
2) Double clutching is not just for the track. It preserves synchros under proper street driving dramatically compared to not doing it. Even for hard steel, triple-cone pieces. This point amplifies when you have relatively weak synchros like our Evo units...
Originally Posted by 86gti
lol double clutching
1) you dont need to do it, thats what synchros are for
2) dont do it
1) you dont need to do it, thats what synchros are for
2) dont do it
What I don't understand is, if you have a fully functioning clutch master & slave cylinder, why would two clutch pumps be any different than one clutch pump? The amount of fluid being displaced per pump should be the same. So if you adjust your clutch pedal right, would you still need to double clutch?
It has nothing to do with the fluid or pumping. The reason is in point 1 from my post above. To state it another way:
When downshifting, the input shaft speed needs to match the output shaft speed (connected to the wheels). With the clutch disengaged, the clutch plate/input shaft assembly spins free. The only way to speed it up to match the output is to engage the clutch and blip the throttle.
Absolutely required in some gearboxes, the best way to do it in most gearboxes.
When downshifting, the input shaft speed needs to match the output shaft speed (connected to the wheels). With the clutch disengaged, the clutch plate/input shaft assembly spins free. The only way to speed it up to match the output is to engage the clutch and blip the throttle.
Absolutely required in some gearboxes, the best way to do it in most gearboxes.
Originally Posted by marksae
What I don't understand is, if you have a fully functioning clutch master & slave cylinder, why would two clutch pumps be any different than one clutch pump? The amount of fluid being displaced per pump should be the same. So if you adjust your clutch pedal right, would you still need to double clutch?
^ you must not have read the thread, or you're trying to get flamed...
Let me try the cliffnote version instead of replying with "read the thread".
the transmission had two different halves that are always connected to each other (all the gears are always engaged). the gears are always meshed, but the gears on the output shaft are free spinning on the shaft. when you "select a gear" you're engaging THAT gear to the shaft. The rest remain free-spinning. The two halves are 1: the input shaft that has the clutch, and 2: the output shaft that's always connected to the drivetrain.
The engine needs to rev up for a downshift. so you can blip the throttle for this to match speed to the drivetrain. You can only do this when the clutch is disengaged.
When you disengage the clutch and select the lower gear, the synchros are forcing the next gear to spin the input shaft faster (clutch). (Ever wonder why the clutch speeds up? Thats why.) This way, when you engage the clutch it feels smooth with a rev match. The lower gear needs a higher rpm on both sides for a smooth lurch-free getaway.
the problem:
using the synchros to speed up the input shaft causes excessive wear, especially on downshifting where things are being forced to speed up. It's one thing to match speeds as they're slowing down (upshifting for the next gear) as it's MUCH easier.
When you rev match, you can use the engine to speed up the input shaft instead of forcing the synchros to do this for you.
1: Clutch off and rev match (this sets the speed of engagement)
2: Clutch on in neutral (this is when the input shaft is matches to the higher engine rev)
3: Clutch off and in gear (it slips in easily because the synchros have no work to do)
4: Clutch on gas it and go in your lower gear.
Let me try the cliffnote version instead of replying with "read the thread".
the transmission had two different halves that are always connected to each other (all the gears are always engaged). the gears are always meshed, but the gears on the output shaft are free spinning on the shaft. when you "select a gear" you're engaging THAT gear to the shaft. The rest remain free-spinning. The two halves are 1: the input shaft that has the clutch, and 2: the output shaft that's always connected to the drivetrain.
The engine needs to rev up for a downshift. so you can blip the throttle for this to match speed to the drivetrain. You can only do this when the clutch is disengaged.
When you disengage the clutch and select the lower gear, the synchros are forcing the next gear to spin the input shaft faster (clutch). (Ever wonder why the clutch speeds up? Thats why.) This way, when you engage the clutch it feels smooth with a rev match. The lower gear needs a higher rpm on both sides for a smooth lurch-free getaway.
the problem:
using the synchros to speed up the input shaft causes excessive wear, especially on downshifting where things are being forced to speed up. It's one thing to match speeds as they're slowing down (upshifting for the next gear) as it's MUCH easier.
When you rev match, you can use the engine to speed up the input shaft instead of forcing the synchros to do this for you.
1: Clutch off and rev match (this sets the speed of engagement)
2: Clutch on in neutral (this is when the input shaft is matches to the higher engine rev)
3: Clutch off and in gear (it slips in easily because the synchros have no work to do)
4: Clutch on gas it and go in your lower gear.



