Notices
DynoFlash [Visit Site]

Case Study # 80- Mr with Injen Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #1  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Case Study # 80- Mr with Injen Intake

Just another day at the office - nothing special

MR 2005
Injen Intake
HKS EVC V
Walbro pump
3" exhuast

Custom Dyno Flash


Attached Thumbnails Case Study # 80- Mr with Injen Intake-mrinejen84.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #2  
jxs1984's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: NY
al thanks for the tune and the lovely thumb ups

dont get me wrong, i am happy with the result... but here's what i found out

when i saw you playing with my boost controller, volume A was supposed to be my "gas saver" settings, the offset was at 180%

so i switched to volume B, 21psi and 100% offset... i felt a little bit more pull.

wish it was dyno'd with these settings (100% offset) probably get some better numbers...

what do you think? overall i am happy! couldnt believe it did 302/296 on 180% offset lol

Last edited by jxs1984; Aug 4, 2005 at 04:44 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 06:59 PM
  #3  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by jxs1984
al thanks for the tune and the lovely thumb ups

dont get me wrong, i am happy with the result... but here's what i found out

when i saw you playing with my boost controller, volume A was supposed to be my "gas saver" settings, the offset was at 180%

so i switched to volume B, 21psi and 100% offset... i felt a little bit more pull.

wish it was dyno'd with these settings (100% offset) probably get some better numbers...

what do you think? overall i am happy! couldnt believe it did 302/296 on 180% offset lol
Since we were able to obtain 21 psi on the dyno, the boost was at an appropriate level for tuning, and therefore it matters not how you set the offset function on the street as long as you mainatin the 21 - 22 psi level. The spool up is not an issue on the dyno as we start the spool up very low.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 07:01 PM
  #4  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by jxs1984
al thanks for the tune and the lovely thumb ups

dont get me wrong, i am happy with the result... but here's what i found out

when i saw you playing with my boost controller, volume A was supposed to be my "gas saver" settings, the offset was at 180%

so i switched to volume B, 21psi and 100% offset... i felt a little bit more pull.

wish it was dyno'd with these settings (100% offset) probably get some better numbers...

what do you think? overall i am happy! couldnt believe it did 302/296 on 180% offset lol
BTW - I STRONGLY advise against so called "gas saver" settings. Leave the boost controller set normal and control your boost and fuel mileage with the right foot. The factory tune and my tune are both NOT designed for full thottle low boost driving.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #5  
jxs1984's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
BTW - I STRONGLY advise against so called "gas saver" settings. Leave the boost controller set normal and control your boost and fuel mileage with the right foot. The factory tune and my tune are both NOT designed for full thottle low boost driving.
ohh ok, thanks for the heads up!
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #6  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Who the heck wants to save gas anyway with a tq curve that looks like that ?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 05:12 AM
  #7  
twan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: NY
Nice numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 05:26 AM
  #8  
mac74's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: boston
nice. But why do they make so much more than the 04"s with same mods?? Turbo?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 05:41 AM
  #9  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
Those numbers look similar, very similar to mine, with the exception of part manufactures. 303 hp, 305 tq with an 2004...

Al does awsome work...
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 06:00 AM
  #10  
mac74's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: boston
Sorry 04 evo 8 not mr.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #11  
jxs1984's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by kmcconn9
Those numbers look similar, very similar to mine, with the exception of part manufactures. 303 hp, 305 tq with an 2004...

Al does awsome work...
do you have high flow cat?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #12  
Widebandphillip's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I have a gas saver function on my avcr. It's called off.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #13  
MAAGJR's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles CA
Originally Posted by mac74
nice. But why do they make so much more than the 04"s with same mods?? Turbo?
Because they have a Larger turbo than 04
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #14  
titaniumkingpin's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 835
Likes: 1
damn, i got cams and my #s are lower.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #15  
awdmofo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
is the 3" exhaust a catback or turboback? If it's a catback w/ stock cat and stock downpipe then this is mighty impressive.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 PM.