Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

E85 Tester- Is This Right?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 02:03 PM
  #16  
rodent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 700
Likes: 3
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
Yeah, I need to look there.

Here's the vehicles I found that sensor should be in-
(please correct if I'm wrong)

Chevrolet

Avalanche 4.8L, model year 2010
VIN 8th character for 2010 = A

Avalanche 5.3L, model years 2005 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2005-2006 = Z, for 2007-2008 = 0 or 3, for 2009 - 2010 = 0, for 2011 = 0 or 3

Avalanche 6.2L, model year 2009 and 2010
VIN 8th character = 2

Equinox 3.0L, model year 2011
VIN 8th character = 5

Express 4.8L, model years 2010 and 2011
VIN 8th character for 2010 = A

Express 5.3L, model years 2007 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2007-2008 = Z, for 2009 - 2011 = 4 (check fuel door)

Express 6.0L, model year 2010 and 2011
VIN 8th character = G

HHR 2.2L, model years 2009 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2009 - 2010 = B, for 2011 = W

HHR 2.4L, model year 2009 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2009 - 2010 = V, for 2011 = U

Impala 3.5L, model years 2006 - 2011
VIN 8th character = K

Impala 3.9L, model years 2008 - 2011
VIN 8th character = R, for 2009 - 2010 = M

Impala (police package) 3.5L, model years 2008 - 2010
VIN 8th character = K

Malibu 2.4L, model year 2010
VIN 8th character = 0

Malibu (fleet and gov models) 2.4L, model year 2011
VIN 8th character = U

Malibu 3.5L, model year 2010
VIN 8th character = K

Monte Carlo 3.5L, model years 2006 - 2007
VIN 8th character = K

S-10 pickup 2WD 2.2L, model years 2000 - 2002
VIN 8th character = 5

Silverado pickup 4.8L, model years 2010 and 2011
VIN 8th character = A

Silverado pickup 2WD & 4WD 5.3L, model years 2003 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2003 - 2006 = Z, for 2007-2008 = 0, 3 or Z, for 2009 - 2010 = 0 or 3

Silverado pickup 2WD & 4WD 6.2L, model years 2009 - 2011
VIN 8th character = 2

Suburban 5.3L, model years 2002 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2002 - 2006 = Z, for 2007 - 2011 = 0 or 3

Suburban6.2L, model year 2010
VIN 8th character for 2010 = 2

Tahoe 6.2L, model years 2009 - 2010
VIN 8th character = 2

Tahoe 5.3L, model years 2002 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2002 - 2006 = Z, for 2007-2008 = 0 or 3, for 2009 - 2011 = 0

Tahoe (police package) 5.3L, model years 2005 - 2010
VIN 8th character for 2005 - 2006 = Z, for 2007-2008 = 0 or 3, for 2009 = 0, or 2010 = 0 or 3

Uplander 3.9L, model years 2007 - 2008
VIN 8th character = W

GMC

Savana 4.8L, model years 2010 and 2011
VIN 8th character = A

Savana 5.3L, model years 2007 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2007 - 2008 = Z, for 2009 - 2010 = 4 (check fuel door)

Savana 6.0L, model years 2010 and 2011
VIN 8th character = G

Sierra 4.8L, model years 2010 and 2011
VIN 8th character = A

Sierra pickup 2WD & 4WD 5.3L, model years 2002 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2002 - 2006 = Z, for 2007 - 2008 = 0, 3 or Z, for 2009 - 2011 = 0 or 3

Sierra Denali 2WD & 4WD 6.2L, model years 2009 - 2011
VIN 8th character = 2

Sonoma pickup 2WD 2.2L, model years 2000 - 2002
VIN 8th character = 5

Terrain 3.0L, model year 2011
VIN 8th character = 5

Yukon 5.3L, model years 2002 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2002 - 2006 = Z, for 2007-2008 = 0 or 3, for 2009 - 2011 = 0

Yukon Denali 6.2L, model years 2009 - 2011
VIN 8th character = 2, for 2011 = F

Yukon XL 5.3L, model years 2002 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2002 - 2006 = z, for 2007 - 2011 = 0 or 3

Yukon XL Denali 6.2L, model years 2009 - 2011
VIN 8th character for 2009 = 2, for 2010 = 1, for 2011 = F

Last edited by rodent; Apr 23, 2011 at 02:07 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 06:56 PM
  #17  
1outlaw's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
on a real fast look - that list appears to be the entire Chev/Gmc list of FFV's. All the later ones have no sensor to my knowlege and instead simply use an algorithm to read trims and other data to guess what you put in the tank- that is the way my company 3.5L Impalas do it.

Instead look for the S10- I have one of those (a 2001 2.2L FFV) which has an honest to God sensor in it that still works just fine after 10 years. It and the Sonoma were about the only ones I know for sure in that list that has the real sensor but perhaps someone else here knows if the real early (pre-2004) 5.3L's used them- I believe they might have.

Automakers dropped the idea of using the sensor due to it's cost and having watched Chrysler do fine without. Not sure what year Ford stopped using them but the '05 Taurus in our Fleet does not have one- early ones did. Will the Zeitronix kit work with a Ford sensor?

I wished I still knew where the list of vehicles that had these sensors in them was so I could post it up- i'll look but not sure if I can find it- been about 2 years since that discussion

Edit- here is some info;
http://www.theturboforums.com/smf/in...topic=108727.0

Unfortunately one of the old links was broken and for the life of me I cannot recall where we discussed the cut-off dates on Ford and GM models. You might want to call a dealer for that info.

Last edited by 1outlaw; Apr 23, 2011 at 07:21 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 04:55 PM
  #18  
ChadAyers's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ.
Have any of you seen an electric all in one tester? Id like something that we can test drums with easily. Thanks in advance. -Chad
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 07:03 PM
  #19  
Zeitronix's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ChadAyers
Have any of you seen an electric all in one tester? Id like something that we can test drums with easily. Thanks in advance. -Chad
A $1 funnel makes flex fuel sensor and ECA all in one sampling tester.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 07:26 AM
  #20  
skiracer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by ChadAyers
Have any of you seen an electric all in one tester? Id like something that we can test drums with easily. Thanks in advance. -Chad
I've seen some on the internet, but they're lab equipment and cost several thousand dollars.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 09:35 PM
  #21  
1outlaw's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
A lot of GM dealerships use the Kent-Moore unit. It needs to be kept calibrated (not difficult) and it is very critical to follow the sample proceedure exactly- I have seen dealerships come up with very bad numbers (too high of alcohol) from leaving the sample on the machine too long.

Most guys racing just do the water phase separation test but it is not super accurate.

Try developing a relationship with the station manager so he will share his load manifests with you which would normally state the gallons of gas vs ethanol.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 09:51 PM
  #22  
Positron's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Wherever is clever
I love my Zeitronix ECA. Takes the time & guess work from using test tubes. Though I never had to do that

Dont mind the ERror read out, I just barely hooked it up when this picture was taken
ip_pix_005Large.jpg?t=1305953324

ip_pix_021Medium.jpg?t=1305953324
Reply
Old May 23, 2011 | 08:57 AM
  #23  
Zeitronix's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
That's a great caged Zeitronix ECA installation. You really just look at the gauge once, after a fill up.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2011 | 01:31 PM
  #24  
Angel Evo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: tacoma wa
looks nice that sensor i want one !!!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #25  
The_X_Effect's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 6
From: Saukvegas, WI
Yea this will be my next modification!! How easy is the install i was looking at your install thread (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/al...iewed-ttp.html) and was confused about the fuel lines that u hook up. Do u have a better diagram of exactly what needs to be done?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 03:19 PM
  #26  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Originally Posted by 10isace
So I just tested my E85 and this is what it ended up looking like. The water is at the top and the clouded area is E85. According to this I have like @ E92 Is this right?
Not correct unless that blender wants to get in huge trouble with the EPA. I'm in the ethanol industry and blend rates for E85 are randomly audited by the EPA so I highly doubt a blender would be willing to risk it; E85 spec says between 70-85% ethanol. Even our denaturant inclusion rate is monitored (2%). With that said, anything is possible I suppose.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 08:31 AM
  #27  
rodent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 700
Likes: 3
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
Originally Posted by Kracka
Not correct unless that blender wants to get in huge trouble with the EPA. I'm in the ethanol industry and blend rates for E85 are randomly audited by the EPA so I highly doubt a blender would be willing to risk it; E85 spec says between 70-85% ethanol. Even our denaturant inclusion rate is monitored (2%). With that said, anything is possible I suppose.
There's several stations here in Colorado that get above 90% in the summer. There's one station that runs around 90% year around.



Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 07:34 PM
  #28  
Garth's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by 1outlaw
Will the Zeitronix kit work with a Ford sensor?
I'm using a sensor out of a 2000 Taurus. It works great. The Zeitronix plug does not fit, I had to get one from Ford. Got the sensor for $50. The inlet and outlet lines are different from the GM sensors, but that worked out better for my location in my car.

Here is the vehicle list I used to search for a sensor:

http://www.zeitronix.com/Products/ECA/ECA.shtml

Last edited by Garth; Aug 14, 2011 at 07:44 PM. Reason: added info.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 07:45 PM
  #29  
opie's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: boro
i have a question about how much fuel you can flow threw the gm or ford flex sensor? my car makes over 700hp and would that sensor even flow enough for my setup?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 07:56 PM
  #30  
Garth's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
For a modern fuel injected engine, the sensor is normally placed in the return line that goes back to the fuel tank. This way it shouldn't restrict the fuel flow to your engine.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:26 AM.