I made a good power with this map today.
I was surprised with this flash. It blew away my finely tunned SAFC tune by just one reflash.

the mods are:

264/274 HKS cams.
680cc injectors
65mm throttle body
Turbo back with ported exhaust mani and Ebay o2 housing.
Blitz Sus power intake cone filter with cusco intake pipe.
Ebay LICP
HallmanMBC at 21 psi peak and taper to 18 psi.
91 octane

Note:
I used 620 as the injector scale value.
mid range is bit lean. I think I will make it more rich for my next reflash .

Get the map from this link below:

http://www.savefile.com/files/6955224

Edit: the below file is not the right one. I haven't tested this yet.
It is improved version of the above one though.....
http://www.savefile.com/files/5737854

Edit:
This is the current one. and It is significantly different from previous posts.
I recommand using this one as your base map with 680cc injectors and cams.
http://www.savefile.com/files/4761750

 

No before and after results?

 

Do you have to have the cable hooked up to the car to find the maps included with the ECUFlash software? I'm still waiting on my cable, that's why I'm asking. I looked around without it hooked up and can't find a damn thing.

 

I didn't test it on the dyno. I road test and measure the time using my logger...somewhat like G-tech Pro. before flash = 5.2 sec , After flash =4.5 From 3000~7000 rpm good enough?

 

what maps are you talking about?
you can download and view my map without the cable.
once you get the cable, you pull the Rom file from your car and use that to make changes. and flash the ecu using your file... not mine.

 

Nice! I may just get all the stuff like your for my MR and start out with your map then.

 

First off thanks for posting your map. What tools did you use to monitor your A/F?

I'm a little confused though. You say above that your midrange in lean, yet when I view your high octain fuel map its just a touch richer then the stock LOW octain map?

 

good job taenaive

 

I used the logger. So, it can't be accurate but I know it is lean from my past experiences with my car.

Yes, my car gets very lean on the midrange. I noticed that if the car put down more power and gets more efficient, it gets leaner and leaner there. It might has to do with the 264 intake cam. My midrange is much stronger than stock(about 320~340tq from my getto style road dyno)!

 

so you are using a pocketlogger to monitor your A/F via narrowband o2 sensor voltage, is that correct? If so then I would assume that your looking at your timing also. What kind of timing curve are you seeing if you don't mind me asking?

 

Yes. that is correct.
Here is the timing and other info:

C:\TEMP\taelogEvo>logger5.exe 5-24-06.log
file opened
The file 'data2' was opened
2836.00: 14.00, 0.62, 100.20, 61.270 torque = N/A
2926.00: 11.00, 0.86, 100.20, 61.500 tq= 126.62 hp= 70.57
3070.00: 7.00, 0.86, 100.20, 61.740 tq= 194.15 hp= 113.53
3246.00: 6.00, 0.88, 100.20, 61.950 tq= 271.20 hp= 167.68
3414.00: 3.00, 0.90, 100.20, 62.180 tq= 236.36 hp= 153.70
3672.00: 2.00, 0.92, 100.20, 62.410 tq= 362.98 hp= 253.88
3875.00: 1.00, 0.90, 100.20, 62.650 tq= 273.70 hp= 202.02
4090.00: 2.00, 0.92, 100.20, 62.860 tq= 331.29 hp= 258.09
4316.00: 3.00, 0.92, 100.20, 63.090 tq= 317.96 hp= 261.40
4582.00: 2.00, 0.92, 100.20, 63.330 tq= 358.64 hp= 313.01
4781.00: 2.00, 0.92, 100.20, 63.560 tq= 279.98 hp= 254.96
4965.00: 3.00, 0.92, 100.20, 63.790 tq= 258.87 hp= 244.82
5195.00: 4.00, 0.92, 100.20, 64.010 tq= 338.30 hp= 334.75
5406.00: 4.00, 0.92, 100.20, 64.250 tq= 284.49 hp= 292.94
5625.00: 4.00, 0.94, 100.20, 64.480 tq= 308.11 hp= 330.12
5813.00: 5.00, 0.94, 100.20, 64.690 tq= 289.69 hp= 320.76
6023.00: 6.00, 0.94, 100.20, 64.940 tq= 271.81 hp= 311.84
6219.00: 8.00, 0.94, 100.20, 65.160 tq= 288.29 hp= 341.50
6426.00: 10.00, 0.94, 100.20, 65.400 tq= 279.10 hp= 341.62
6609.00: 10.00, 0.94, 100.20, 65.620 tq= 269.17 hp= 338.84
6758.00: 12.00, 0.94, 100.20, 65.840 tq= 219.16 hp= 282.12
6949.00: 13.00, 0.94, 100.20, 66.060 tq= 280.93 hp= 371.85
7094.00: 14.00, 0.96, 100.20, 66.300 tq= 195.50 hp= 264.16
7246.00: 15.00, 0.96, 100.20, 66.550 tq= 196.74 hp= 271.54
7410.00: 15.00, 0.96, 100.20, 66.760 tq= 252.71 hp= 356.68
tq total over 3k rpm = 14811.25
total time above 3k rpm = 17.031
normalized time for 3k~7k = 4.599
normalized time for 3.5k~5.5k = 2.053
normalized time for 5.5k~7k = 1.819
RPM range 3500 ~ 4000 tq= 318.34 Hp= 227.39
RPM range 4000 ~ 4500 tq= 324.63 Hp= 262.79
RPM range 4500 ~ 5000 tq= 299.16 Hp= 270.67
RPM range 5000 ~ 5500 tq= 311.39 Hp= 311.39
RPM range 5500 ~ 6000 tq= 298.90 Hp= 327.37
RPM range 6000 ~ 6500 tq= 279.73 Hp= 333.02
RPM range 6500 ~ 7000 tq= 256.42 Hp= 329.68
RPM range 7000 ~ 7500 tq= 214.98 Hp= 296.88

 

nice.
what kind of software are you using with your logger?
I would have thought that you could eek more timing out of the upper range. I guess the 91 octain is whats holding you back?

Any plans to take it to the track?

 

DSM logger.

Yes, There are ton's of improvments I can make on this map.
this was just my first shot( one reflash)! I just thought of the conservative fuel and timing curve from my SAFC tune experience and put it there blindly. No wonder dynoflash guarantees 20WHP gain . Gains over the stock map is not that hard to do with ECU flash

 

Dang!
I just found that orginal file I uploaded wasn't the right one. I edited the top post so everyone can get the Test proven right file. please redownload the file. Although, I think that original map will make more power and safer.

 

yeah I know you can view downloaded maps w/o cable. I thought some one said there were maps that came with the actual ECUFlash software in another thread.