Notices
ECU Flash

EcuFlash Part 2...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
EcuFlash Part 2...

Well sorta...

I thought this last weekend would have been cooler on the Gruppe-s dyno then 2 weeks ago. Boy was I wrong.

Hot as hell is the only way to describe it.

I got back on the dyno this last weekend to fine tune my 91 octane tune with ECUflash. Turned out that I didn't need to do a thing to the tune after my last round of street tuning. The tune is solid as a rock. Super consistant pull after pull even in a 90F+ room filled with stuffy exhaust fumes and less air flow then you would get on the street/track:



So I went straight to working on my open-track 100 octane tune using ECU+ on top of the 91 octane ECUflash tune. More boost, a little bit more timing and 11.5 AFRS, consistant again:



The car is a freaking torque monster now with 100 octane, 25psi spike dropping to 20 psi up top, check the torque curve difference between 100 octane and 91 octane tunes:



These are all ECU+ dyno charts that where done off logs from the car on the gruppe-s mustang dyno. I will get the actual mustang dyno print-outs later, Mike and I where in a rush to get home.

I will also try and do some actual street pulls with ECU+ dyno soon, they usually read a little higher with the additional airflow. I also can't wait to see what the car will do on the dyno on a cooler day.

I'm really happy how easy it was to get the car super consistant with the EcuFlash. Pull after pull after pull..


..

Last edited by razorlab; Jun 21, 2006 at 11:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #2  
f-dub's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 335
Likes: 1
From: Renton, WA
Wow, very nice numbers.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 02:04 PM
  #3  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
out of curiosity, how comparable were the numbers from ECU+ to the mustang sheet?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #4  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
out of curiosity, how comparable were the numbers from ECU+ to the mustang sheet?
On 91, the ECU+ numbers are spot on in TQ and about -10whp off in peak HP. Remember it was very hot and stuffy and my car never makes good torque in those conditions. I was about 19-20wtq off of my usual.

The 100 octane tune was about +5 within whp and actually a bit off in TRQ, in normal temps day its much closer matched to the mustang.

This mustang always reads lower TQ numbers then HP.

Mike is gone at mid-ohio this week but when he gets back I will get the printouts.

I don't really tune by the numbers anymore, more the curves and consistancy. Just looking at that torque curve spread on the 100 vs 91 tune is yummy. The car is just a tad fun to drive on 100 octane now.

Last edited by razorlab; Jun 21, 2006 at 03:35 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
razorlab
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
5165
Aug 11, 2024 07:56 PM
GST Motorsports
09+ Lancer Ralliart General
43
Aug 4, 2023 04:34 PM
razorlab
ECU Flash
631
Sep 14, 2019 07:23 AM
razorlab
For Sale - Cars For Sale
9
Jun 4, 2014 06:27 PM
razorlab
ECU Flash
12
Dec 2, 2006 07:46 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:56 AM.