Notices
ECU Flash

Dyno Tune knock Gadget and ECU datalog knock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #46  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by dan l
No he's right. The OEM knock sensor system with DSP integral to the ECU is so excellent that nothing in the aftermarket will surpass it on the original engine. The OEM knock system is so excellent that it has gone 9's in the quarter on DSMLink cars and possibly (but unconfirmed) 8's. I think buschurs old RWD talon wen 8's or 7's? On the stock ecu with TMO chip and a VPC. David can comment if he chooses to on the exact setup. I saw the car way back in the day (like 2001???) at Maple Grove but forget the exact specifics.
Not surprising, another member in this thread that knows what he is talking about. We are one step closer to an educated evolutionm.net.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 07:40 AM
  #47  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
OK, cute little back-n-forth comments. Now how about you both get back on topic?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #48  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by dan l
And about all I tune anymore are high end built motors without balance shafts so why is it an issue again?
Phantom knocksums under 4000rpms.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 07:50 AM
  #49  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Phantom knocksums under 4000rpms.
I am not having issues with this on my friends stroker evo w/o balance shafts. My other friends 6 bolt 2.0L non balance shaft 2g talon on Link is also not having issues. I don't have issues on my 9 thou piston/wall clearance 1g. Neither did I when my motor was stock minus balance shafts. I have seen it be an issue on 100% stock cars (especially 1g's). I have code that ignores the knock sensor up to 1.0grams/rev for those issues. However in the past, before the code, 90% of the time those issues were resolved by replacing the lash adjusters, replacing the knock sensor, checking the base ignition timing and possibly altering part throttle timing/fueling. My personal 1g had phantom knock issues in 2000 and after catching up on maintainence it was fixed. Your probably aware of the phantom knock list on yahoo groups and I was an active poster back in the day.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #50  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
"Never assume knock to be phantom" is my approach. If there's knock sum registered, there's knock.

Once thought I was getting phantom knock. Found out the PVCC oil trap was full leaking a small amount of oil into combustion. Since oil has an octane of about nothing - it knocked.

Cleaned oil trap and it was fixed.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #51  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
Yeah but low load (IE: part throttle knock) isn't dangerous. You can have real part throttle knock (usually ignition advance related) for years and it won't hurt a thing. Under load though knock starts becoming dangerous as the peak pressure of the detonation event starts growing exponentially. Also low RPM high load knock is MUCH more dangerous than high rpm high load knock. At high rpm's the piston is running away from the detonation wave at a faster rate than at low RPM. At low RPM the piston has to absorb a much larger amount of the detonation event.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 01:19 AM
  #52  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
Originally Posted by dan l
Yeah but low load (IE: part throttle knock) isn't dangerous. You can have real part throttle knock (usually ignition advance related) for years and it won't hurt a thing. Under load though knock starts becoming dangerous as the peak pressure of the detonation event starts growing exponentially. Also low RPM high load knock is MUCH more dangerous than high rpm high load knock. At high rpm's the piston is running away from the detonation wave at a faster rate than at low RPM. At low RPM the piston has to absorb a much larger amount of the detonation event.
interesting makes sense
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tunermt
AEM EMS
24
Dec 13, 2025 01:26 AM
nismo n9ne
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
22
Feb 9, 2011 01:21 PM
xceler8rob
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Sep 1, 2009 09:12 PM
Chino1
ECU Flash
20
Mar 7, 2007 01:58 PM
racegate
AEM EMS
6
Jul 17, 2005 01:35 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:34 PM.