Mind looking at a couple logs?
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Coastal Maine
Mind looking at a couple logs?
Ive been tinkering with my tune a little bit, and here is where Im at. This is 2 third gear pulls. Im only showing knock (2 cts) on the first. My afr needs some work, but this is right after disabling lean spool, and my first stab before logging afr. Im going to lean it out at spool up about .5, but Im concerned about the knock, even though it is a small amount in that same region.
I think I have a problem with my 2 byte logging. It is usually about 20 higher than the load calc in Mitsulogger and Evoscan. The timing numbers seem to match more closely with the load calc than the 2 byte, so Im hesitant in using it. The logs here are from Evoscan. What could be causing this? Ive gone back and checked to make sure I did the mod right. Could it be my elevation? (roughly 6000') Do I need to compensate for the elevation anyways? Or could it be my POS cone intake that is throwing off the airflow readings? (Ive never had the stock intake) If it is the intake, how do I know when I get the MAF scaled correctly, fuel trims?
Thx in advance
CB
I think I have a problem with my 2 byte logging. It is usually about 20 higher than the load calc in Mitsulogger and Evoscan. The timing numbers seem to match more closely with the load calc than the 2 byte, so Im hesitant in using it. The logs here are from Evoscan. What could be causing this? Ive gone back and checked to make sure I did the mod right. Could it be my elevation? (roughly 6000') Do I need to compensate for the elevation anyways? Or could it be my POS cone intake that is throwing off the airflow readings? (Ive never had the stock intake) If it is the intake, how do I know when I get the MAF scaled correctly, fuel trims?
Thx in advance
CB
Last edited by Charlie_B; Sep 24, 2007 at 02:11 PM.
Ive been tinkering with my tune a little bit, and here is where Im at. This is 2 third gear pulls. Im only showing knock (2 cts) on the first. My afr needs some work, but this is right after disabling lean spool, and my first stab before logging afr. Im going to lean it out at spool up about .5, but Im concerned about the knock, even though it is a small amount in that same region.
I think I have a problem with my 2 byte logging. It is usually about 20 higher than the load calc in Mitsulogger and Evoscan. The timing numbers seem to match more closely with the load calc than the 2 byte, so Im hesitant in using it. The logs here are from Evoscan. What could be causing this? Ive gone back and checked to make sure I did the mod right. Could it be my elevation? (roughly 6000') Do I need to compensate for the elevation anyways? Or could it be my POS cone intake that is throwing off the airflow readings? (Ive never had the stock intake) If it is the intake, how do I know when I get the MAF scaled correctly, fuel trims?
Thx in advance
CB
I think I have a problem with my 2 byte logging. It is usually about 20 higher than the load calc in Mitsulogger and Evoscan. The timing numbers seem to match more closely with the load calc than the 2 byte, so Im hesitant in using it. The logs here are from Evoscan. What could be causing this? Ive gone back and checked to make sure I did the mod right. Could it be my elevation? (roughly 6000') Do I need to compensate for the elevation anyways? Or could it be my POS cone intake that is throwing off the airflow readings? (Ive never had the stock intake) If it is the intake, how do I know when I get the MAF scaled correctly, fuel trims?
Thx in advance
CB
As for your load, if you've installed the 2-byte mod properly, it IS the value that the ECU is using to decide what cell to use on your timing/fuel map. LoadCalc is nothing more than a guess at what the 2-byte is.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Coastal Maine
The thing is, at 4k 2 byte says Im at 260ish load. Whereas loadcalc says 240ish. And the loadcalc is more accurate as far as the numbers I am seeing in my maps. I should only be at 2-3* at 4k/260.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Coastal Maine
Thx for the replies. I know that when the load/rpm falls in between cells, it will interpolate. But it seems to consistently follow the load calc, rather than the 2 byte load. Also, from what Ive read 2byte load is usually lower than loadcalc. Mine is much higher. When you say software, you talking about my laptop or ECU?
thx again.
thx again.
well, I was guessing that the software in the ecu is interpolating "late" or "early".
calc load can read high or low relative to 2byte depending on among other things the injector scale. Mitsulogger's injector scale can be adjusted, evoscan's is a little more difficult, so likely your's is misinterpreting if you have injectors.
calc load can read high or low relative to 2byte depending on among other things the injector scale. Mitsulogger's injector scale can be adjusted, evoscan's is a little more difficult, so likely your's is misinterpreting if you have injectors.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Coastal Maine
Ive been slowly leaning out the 2500-3500 range, and it seems like it is harder due to the AccelEnrichment. Merely because when Im at this spot in the map is the same time that I mash the gas. From most of what Ive seen, people dont generally tune the Enrichment table, should I be? Its defintely getting smoother in the mid - high rpms. I will try to get a new log up tonight.


