There seems to be some discrepancy with Evoscan Maptrace accuracy. I ported the Evoscan log to LogWorks and the chart shows a different trace. Which of the two programs do you guys believe is more accurate

 

I know what you mean. A while back I came to the same conclusion. One thing you need to check is in evoscan did you have the drop down at the top of the maptracer window on average? Try changing the drop down values to maximum, minimum etc. and see how that compares to logworks.

Nevermind. I just saw that they were both on average.

 

I don't use this, but I remember looking at it a while back. I think Evoscan uses the 240 column, for example, for any load of 240-259. I think LogWorks will do it more on a weighted calculation, so for example a 255 load will show up in the 260 column. It looks like Evoscan is the one that isn't doing it 'properly', but don't quote me on that, as this is something that I remembered when looking at it a while back.

 

meh - I dont use map tracing for the above reason...