Notices
ECU Flash

MIVEC and high boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 07:54 AM
  #31  
matt55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by JohnBradley


...and the stock turbo version...well a girl has to have her secrets

BOOOOOO
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #32  
Ph3n1x's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
From: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Originally Posted by razorlab
Interesting Map JB,

I've did some dyno testing way back when and lost *a ton* of hp up top with that kind of advancement. Always made the most power with zero advance. Is that map with an exhaust cam gear?

However I've never to this day tuned S2's. I don't see how those cams would be so drastically different than others though.

Are your findings on the dynojet or on the street?
I concur
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #33  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by Phenixfyah
I concur
Since we are going to revisit this, Bryan was that the Cosworth and Stock...or any cams? I have always found the opposite, but even then I think we are talking about peak versus overall smoothness of the powerband. I lost 1/2mph with zero on the S1's and immediately gained it back when I re-upped the advance to to 6.6*...the S2s do not seem to be any different.

While I cant totally explain how I know, Martin said WAY back in the day that some advance had helped them when running staggered profiles (not totally the same thing I realise as what we are talking about).
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #34  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Since we are going to revisit this, Bryan was that the Cosworth and Stock...or any cams? I have always found the opposite, but even then I think we are talking about peak versus overall smoothness of the powerband. I lost 1/2mph with zero on the S1's and immediately gained it back when I re-upped the advance to to 6.6*...the S2s do not seem to be any different.
I actually tried this out yet again today. I don't really want to revisit this as everyone has their own techniques.

I added advancement up top on a E85 Evo 9 with M2's and the car dropped 10 whp and the peak hp curve flattened out.

On another E85 Evo 9 with FPgreen I tuned last month I gained approx 12whp from actually using negative Mivec up top (-1.8), although this was with a Exhaust cam gear as well.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #35  
oldevodude's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by razorlab
I actually tried this out yet again today. I don't really want to revisit this as everyone has their own techniques.

I added advancement up top on a E85 Evo 9 with M2's and the car dropped 10 whp and the peak hp curve flattened out.

On another E85 Evo 9 with FPgreen I tuned last month I gained approx 12whp from actually using negative Mivec up top (-1.8), although this was with a Exhaust cam gear as well.
Can you define up top please? You are zeroing out 5 or 6 k to redline or cutoff?

TIA
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #36  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
0 6k +
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #37  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
So I am wondering if we dropped MIVEC to zero at peak power and started reintroducing it back into flatten the hp drop back out? We'd end up with all sorts of odd dips but if its what it takes it might be worthwhile.

By revisit maybe I should have said reread...and then I would mean me
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #38  
Oracle1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Using HKS 272's I dropped mivec from 28* to 24* and my fuel afr went 0.5 leaner.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #39  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
if the AFR is leaner then more air is getting burnt - right?

thus more air is getting into the cylinder - right?

therefore you are making more power - right?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #40  
oldevodude's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by razorlab
0 6k +
Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #41  
matt55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by matt55

Good Info here , This weekend Iam going to try 21 vs 28.8 @ peak and see if it fells any diff .
I did drop the advance down after peak to around 20 vs 28.8 this weekend .
The car feel dead afterwards , looking at the boost I see why . It made my GM bcs act like my old mbc quick peak to 25psi and quick drop to 20psi .
So less cam timing = less boost at same wgdc .
Iam going to keep screwing around with it and see whats up .
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #42  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by matt55
I did drop the advance down after peak to around 20 vs 28.8 this weekend .
The car feel dead afterwards , looking at the boost I see why . It made my GM bcs act like my old mbc quick peak to 25psi and quick drop to 20psi .
So less cam timing = less boost at same wgdc .
Iam going to keep screwing around with it and see whats up .
Althought not necessarily the desired effect, that could actually be not-so-bad. Its possible that the air was flowing more efficiently through the engine and actually providing the desired results similar to when you have a higher flowing exhaust and loose some boost up top.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #43  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
The problem with changing MIVEC tune is it is the foundation of the rest of the tune so it could throw off timing and fuel. Make sure you adjust the whole tune when you change the MIVEC.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #44  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Bryan I havent tested this but this was my idea:

Reply
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #45  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Yea I had the same idea. I actually have done something close to that on the bigger turbos.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM.