Notices
ECU Flash

my first crack at this tuning thing check it out.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 05:29 AM
  #46  
adcgn45's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: florida
i know that spike is off but i have other log runs without the spike and they have similar numbers anywhere from 330-340
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #47  
rgar's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
The little spike at the end is what raises it to 340, looks like max hp is about 330ish from the normal curve.

I don't think he was trying to knock your pull, just saying that if you had a huge spike at the end that said you hit 370, doesn't mean you should use that number. If you have other graphs without the bump at the end that say you hit 340, then you probably are hitting around there.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #48  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
The timing seems very low and the AFRs are on the rich side on the top end. What happens if you raise the timing and lean it out? I bet you'd make more power and you'd also be running safer (lower EGTs). If you want to get rid of that lift off knock at 7500, try reducing the timing at that RPM range in the low load cell. The big jump in timing is probably causing the knock.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 07:01 PM
  #49  
adcgn45's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: florida
yeah i do have other logs that say 340 and 330. im still working on this tune thats my first tune after the new cams and there is a ways to go i can see. i initially richened up my old tune which was pretty much on point.i did that so i could have a safe log and go from there. this was the first tune after . so ill be doing another one soon
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 09:49 AM
  #50  
Bassicfun's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 756
Likes: 1
From: Mid Ohio
Interesting none the less... I will be working on mine this week, and some good pointers in your thread. I will share any input I have after working on mine later this week. Curves do not look hateful either.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #51  
lp_ceo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn NYC
subcribed also
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #52  
adcgn45's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: florida
update

ive gotten rid of my old rom 96940013 which i couldnt log 2byte load on thanks to heideki now running 9417 rom lol.
anyway i also ditched my greddy and got a hallman ive turned up the boost a bit and redid my maps here they are,hoping for around 330-350 whp
Attached Thumbnails my first crack at this tuning thing check it out.-my-9417-rom-1st-mod.png  
Attached Files
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 05:37 PM
  #53  
[I.R.A.]_FBi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: .
vdr soon?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 05:44 PM
  #54  
adcgn45's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: florida
yea jack of all trades ran one for me and here it is
Attached Thumbnails my first crack at this tuning thing check it out.-.vdr.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 06:13 PM
  #55  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by adcgn45
ive gotten rid of my old rom 96940013 which i couldnt log 2byte load on...
Didn't I give you the variables to log about a month ago? I know I did in some thread somewhere.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 06:35 PM
  #56  
adcgn45's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: florida
yea you did but things arent the same with 0013 none of the stuff for 0011 work i tried everything.its the strangest rom
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 07:37 PM
  #57  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
No, I gave you the addresses for 0013.

Remember I asked you what was at 1c in the 0013 mut table. And I gave you addresses based on that variable.

Here is the thread where I gave you the info.

Last edited by l2r99gst; Aug 20, 2010 at 07:46 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 07:51 PM
  #58  
adcgn45's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: florida
yes i remember but they did not work perhaps it was my error i dont know. im no longer using that twisted rom thank god
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #59  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
OK...I see why it didn't work. You gave me the wrong value for MUT 1c. For 0013 it is 8999. I saw a thread where you put a screenshot, but the MUT table was defined wrong.

So, your load variables are what I said, but based off of 8999.

2-byte LOAD_Raw (no temp compensation)
0x899 + 0x09 = 0x89A2
0x899 + 0x0A = 0x89A3
2-byte LOAD_Temp_Compensated
0x899 + 0x0B = 0x89A4
0x899 + 0x0C = 0x89A5
2-byte LOAD_Baro_Compensated
0x899 + 0x0D = 0x89A6
0x899 + 0x0E = 0x89A7
2-byte LOAD_Temp_and_Baro_Compensated
0x899 + 0x0F = 0x89A8
0x899 + 0x10 = 0x89A9

Last edited by l2r99gst; Aug 20, 2010 at 07:58 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2010 | 06:20 AM
  #60  
adcgn45's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: florida
ok well this isnt the thread for this. but long before i talked to you i tried those numbers they dont work with 0013. that was the first thing i ever tried
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:56 PM.