Notices
ECU Flash

FreeFuel ECU patch - a flex fuel implementation to Evo ECU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 08:09 PM
  #331  
evoredy's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
Likes: 3
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by wreckleford
Thanks for your input. Based on my experience of the voltage being halved, can you suggest which connection may possibly be wrong with my circuit? I have checked through it and don't see anything wrong but sometimes it's hard to trouble shoot your own work.
Construct was 100% right as per his research and knowledge. The people that are successful with this circuit that do not have an OPAMP most probably have adjusted the scaling for the FF sensor input in the ROM to account for the halved resolution.

I or others can't see any specific defects unless you post a picture and parts list, but if you add the LM741 between the output of the circuit and ECU wired like in the diagram I just posted (that's an updated one BTW), it will solve the impedance issues/as long as there are no major issues with your circuit build.

An 8-pin LM741 pin-out:
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 07:00 AM
  #332  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Ok, I misunderstood your previous post. Was thinking the 741 was a part of the original circuit. I will try this and see.

Looking at Futurlec's site I see a 741CH and a 741CN. Does it matter which I choose? Looking quickly through the data sheets the difference may just be packaging?

And thank again for your input.

Last edited by wreckleford; Oct 12, 2015 at 07:08 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 09:48 AM
  #333  
evoredy's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
Likes: 3
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by wreckleford
Ok, I misunderstood your previous post. Was thinking the 741 was a part of the original circuit. I will try this and see.

Looking at Futurlec's site I see a 741CH and a 741CN. Does it matter which I choose? Looking quickly through the data sheets the difference may just be packaging?

And thank again for your input.
NP. Yes, it's the packaging. the CN variant is the 8-pin DIP.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 03:16 PM
  #334  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
well, this thread certainly went south LOL.

hopefully someone will post a new one.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 04:02 PM
  #335  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
The issues being experienced by me are actually nothing to do with the patch, just the home made frequency to digital converter.

It will just take someone to buy a Zeitronix ECA and implement the patch and pretty soon guys will be jumping all over this. It seems like people don't realize that you don't have to build the box yourself to implement the patch.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2015 | 08:04 AM
  #336  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
I have ordered the LM741. I will provide an update once I put it in and test it.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2015 | 11:15 AM
  #337  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Okay, I got the LM741. I bought the version that resembles a mini water tower. There are no pin numbers, but it has a little tab on it that locates pin # 8. What I need to know now is how the other pins are referenced from this one. Are the pin numbers determined when looking at it from the top or from the bottom (pin side). I assume it is the top side but want to be sure.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2015 | 11:30 AM
  #338  
bpk1337's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 26
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by wreckleford
Okay, I got the LM741. I bought the version that resembles a mini water tower. There are no pin numbers, but it has a little tab on it that locates pin # 8. What I need to know now is how the other pins are referenced from this one. Are the pin numbers determined when looking at it from the top or from the bottom (pin side). I assume it is the top side but want to be sure.
The marked pin of a package is always viewed from the top with the pins facing down in my 4 years of experience in electronics, but just to make sure we can compare the figure 1 package to the figure 3. They wouldn't draw one package from the bottom and one from the top in the same diagram.

As you can see below in comparison with the link, pin 1 is marked, and read on the top left

Amazon.com: Set of 5 pieces IC LM741 or LM741CN or UA741CN or UA741: Automotive Amazon.com: Set of 5 pieces IC LM741 or LM741CN or UA741CN or UA741: Automotive

I hope this makes sense.
Attached Thumbnails FreeFuel ECU patch - a flex fuel implementation to Evo ECU-10-27-2015-11-25-42-am.bmp  

Last edited by bpk1337; Oct 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2015 | 05:42 AM
  #339  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Ok, thanks for your confirmation.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2015 | 02:43 PM
  #340  
wheatbix's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: California
I've been wanting to do this for years, but never found any tuners in CA that do this. It seems this is still the case and everyone on flex-fuel setups self tunes them?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2015 | 03:32 PM
  #341  
kaganader2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: ny
Originally Posted by wheatbix
I've been wanting to do this for years, but never found any tuners in CA that do this. It seems this is still the case and everyone on flex-fuel setups self tunes them?
You can also get a remote e-tune if no one locally tunes with flex fuel
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 05:52 PM
  #342  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Thanks to everyone for the help. I wired in the op amp and it works as intended, problem solved. The voltage in equals voltage out. I wont be able to drive the car for a while yet so I wont be able to report back as to my experiences with the patch itself.

Thanks again.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 08:22 AM
  #343  
Construct's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 161
From: Utah
Originally Posted by wreckleford
Thanks to everyone for the help. I wired in the op amp and it works as intended, problem solved. The voltage in equals voltage out. I wont be able to drive the car for a while yet so I wont be able to report back as to my experiences with the patch itself.
Good to hear. Keep us posted when you get a chance to play with it some more.
Reply
Old May 25, 2016 | 02:18 PM
  #344  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
After many many months I finally started my car with the converter circuit and ethanol content sensor connected. I put a couple gallons of pump fuel in the tank to start with. I measured this with my ethanol tester beforehand and found it to be E07. This showed as E06.9 with the voltage to ethanol percent scaling I used in Evoscan. Threw a half gallon of E98 into the tank and got E22 registered which is roughly correct for the amount I added to the original pump gas. I intend to drain a little bit and check it in the tester also but haven't done so yet.

At this point I am not making use of the free fuel patch rom, just logging ethanol content. The 02 feedback is adjusting for the additional ethanol currently. What I found though is that the ethanol content reported fluctuates a little bit, jumping down to 17% momentarily and back up to 22%. I'm wondering if this is corresponding to changes in my battery voltage (it fluctuates somewhat) or if this is to be expected.

I will update further when I actually implement the patch. At the rate i am going it might be several more months.
Reply
Old May 25, 2016 | 09:42 PM
  #345  
edsct9a's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 202
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by wreckleford
After many many months I finally started my car with the converter circuit and ethanol content sensor connected. I put a couple gallons of pump fuel in the tank to start with. I measured this with my ethanol tester beforehand and found it to be E07. This showed as E06.9 with the voltage to ethanol percent scaling I used in Evoscan. Threw a half gallon of E98 into the tank and got E22 registered which is roughly correct for the amount I added to the original pump gas. I intend to drain a little bit and check it in the tester also but haven't done so yet.

At this point I am not making use of the free fuel patch rom, just logging ethanol content. The 02 feedback is adjusting for the additional ethanol currently. What I found though is that the ethanol content reported fluctuates a little bit, jumping down to 17% momentarily and back up to 22%. I'm wondering if this is corresponding to changes in my battery voltage (it fluctuates somewhat) or if this is to be expected.

I will update further when I actually implement the patch. At the rate i am going it might be several more months.
Glad to hear you're getting somewhere with this. I currently run the Innovate content gauge and it does fluctuate a bit but not as much as you mentioned. On initial start it usually reads a certain percentage then moves anywhere from 1-3%.

Now my gauge is able to output a 0-5v signal would this help? What's the converter circuit for? I'll go back and read tomorrow but maybe you can summarize what's been going on or point me to key posts.

Last edited by edsct9a; May 25, 2016 at 09:52 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:50 PM.