Thing is the roms are not always disassembled by the same person, and the XML could be listed slightly different. I only combined various XML data to make one semi complete XML listing from what was available and recently found.

I had hang on 8859 but not on my 8858.

 

Mm waiting boosting perf answer.


Thanks

 

I found that I could get rid of rev hang by just adjusting this table. It took me a while to find it and in our ROMs it starts to pump the ISCV demand from only 3000RPM. With everything else put back to stock adjusting this one solved it for me.

Give it a go, hope it helps.

<table name="ISCV Demand RPM Adder [rpm > 4500, load > 170, speed > 12 mph]" category="ISCV Control" address="6468" type="2D" level="2" scaling="ISCV_AX2_8">
<table name="RPM" address="7ffc" type="Y Axis" elements="10" scaling="RPM"/>
</table>

 

I did include that in the op for those who are gettin this stuff.

 

I made sdome MIVEC changes only and noticed the values in ISCV Demand Baro Adder**** (FFFF7C0E) (sub_1F6E6) [sub_1EFC0] were affected.

Further experimentation isolated it to the values in the the MIVEC table at Engine Load 280 and RPM 750, 1000, 1250 and 1500.

Is the address for ISCV Demand Baro Adder**** (FFFF7C0E) (sub_1F6E6) [sub_1EFC0] incorrect at 6b00?

 

I'm going with yes it is incorrect

Ill do a little digging in my pms later to see if I have more than one source there

 

Looks like that was carried over from the original set of xmls and not from newer stuff by donner and xr6

 

Mmm, good pick up, it seems to be an incorrect address from way back. I have had a look at the code and it looks like the table address should be 3dfe. The axis address looks right.

 

I will make that change to the zip here soon. I'm on sd so baro doeth not worketh

 

There's two ISCV Demand Baro adder elements in the XML. If we change the address in the second one to 3dfe they'll both be the same? It's the one with the 6b00 address that's linked to Mivec intake advance. Maybe we ditch the second one unless the address can be verified?

<table name="ISCV Demand Baro Adder (FFFF6E98) (sub_1E1EE)" category="ISCV Control" type="2D" address="3dfe" level="2" scaling="ISCV_AX2_8">
<table name="Baro" type="Y Axis" address="6f30" elements="5" scaling="Baro16"/>
</table>

<table name="ISCV Demand Baro Adder**** (FFFF7C0E) (sub_1F6E6) [sub_1EFC0]" category="ISCV Control" type="2D" address="6b00" level="2" scaling="ISCV_AX2_8">
<table name="Baro" type="Y Axis" address="6f30" elements="5" scaling="Baro16"/>
</table>

 

Damn you're clever, my sd rom doesn't have baro so ill never use that. But I can just retag that 6b00 one as (incomplete) for now baro is rarely necessary anyways. ( but obviously nice to have correct )

Good call!

 

Update I still haven't corrected the issue above .. Been too lazy! Just be aware lol appearantly it's redundant anyways

 

good work guys
so is there a final xml after all this add and modified tables?
what is better 8858 or 8859 ?
Thanks for all

 

Should be in the first post. 59 has more support and more attention . This was my idea to draw some here. I've attained smoother running with 8858 with less tuning. Specifically idle.

 

Thanks for everything
So after I replace the new improved .xml file in the (EcuFlash directory),
what do I have to do ?
reflash with what .bin or .hex file ??
Thanks again