Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2.3L stroker JMfab powered 3082r E85 numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #1  
evodude32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
2.3L stroker JMfab powered 3082r E85 numbers

Took my turd to the dyno to see what she could do and get some numbers for JMfabrications, so this is for JMfabrications, didn't spend alot of time on the dyno but I'm happy with the results.
The dyno that was used is a superflow dyno
Here is the dyno graph in SAE uncorrected numbers. These are dynojet projected number btw. I will be taking it to another dyno sometime in the near future to confirm the numbers. Corrected numbers came in at 685whp and 598wtq since we were at 5000ft. of elevation


Mods on the car are
2.3L stroker with JE pistons /eagle rods /OEM mits 2.4 crank built by me
stock head with exception of HKS 280 cams
GT3082r (formerly known as the FP 3065 turbo) With tial SS .82 A/R v-band exhaust housing
Tial 44mm wastegate
no name brand 3" turbo back exhaust
JMfabrications tial v-band exhaust manifold
JMfabrications 3" v-band o2 housing
JMfabrications drag version intake manifold
JMfabrications I/C pipes
JMfabrications 4" FMIC
Tial BOV
AEM EMS tuned by me
Halman MBC @ 31lbs (AEM logged) 34lbs via boost gauge
E85 fuel straight from the pump
Hyundai sonata 2.4L ignition coils
QM twin disc clutch
double pumper with 2 modded walbro 255's
FIC bluemax 1450cc injectors @ 91% duty
stock fuel rail, lines, FPR
ARP head studs/main studs

The car currently is completely maxed out on the tune/turbo and cams, if I try to turn the boost up anymore the wastegate doesn't even open (too much back pressure). Next step is to toss a larger exhaust housing (tial SS 1.06a/r) on it and get a better set of cams, and maybe have FP do a HTA treatment on the turbo. I wanna see how far I can get with this turbo.


Here is a video of the run a buddy of mine took, the numbers in the videos were corrected numbers so it's a bit inflated, we did not get video of the dyno plot in SAE un-corrected, so do not get confused with the numbers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E12FpBExPZo

lets please keep this thread for data for JMfab. Time will tell when I take it to the track, should do around 139-140mph traps in full weight trim. The car did do 10.95 @130mph on a stock motor last year with all the mods included above at 22lbs and 530whp (dynojet corrected numbers)

Last edited by evodude32; Jun 17, 2010 at 09:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #2  
Timmay81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Utah
photochop!!!! it was really 122hp
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:10 PM
  #3  
evodude32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by Timmay81
photochop!!!! it was really 122hp
Lol, I thought it was 115whp?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 04:03 PM
  #4  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
does it have the anti surge compressor housing?
I've seen 300kwatw (about 400-450whp) on 26psi with pump gas, but it surges alot at the 4000-4500 range.

But gratz on the figures! that must be stupid to drive on the road...
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #5  
evodude32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by RSMike
does it have the anti surge compressor housing?
I've seen 300kwatw (about 400-450whp) on 26psi with pump gas, but it surges alot at the 4000-4500 range.

But gratz on the figures! that must be stupid to drive on the road...

Yes it does have the anti-surge compressor housing, same compressor housing on a standard gt3582r since they both have the same 65lb/min compressor wheel, Only difference is the exhaust wheel, This has the gt30 exhaust wheel as apposed to the gt35r wheel.
And yes it is extremely fun to drive on the street, in cool weather it loves to blow all 4 tires off from a 2nd gear roll.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 04:46 PM
  #6  
RAbishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
Nice results!
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #7  
Pizzamangtr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
Nice power! I wants me a jmfab intake manifold! I have their name on my strutbar! Jim hook a brotha up! Thats definately a ripper as* car though! Gotta hit the track and post results! GL!
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 07:10 PM
  #8  
forc3 f3d's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 231
Likes: 1
From: Germany
JMFab ftw
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 09:04 PM
  #9  
kreionic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
From: MD/ NY
nice results. JM fab is great. Are you using any cdi box with those coils?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 09:28 PM
  #10  
evodude32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by kreionic
nice results. JM fab is great. Are you using any cdi box with those coils?

No CDI with these coils, just AEM coil dwell settings tweaked, no missfire at all.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 09:37 PM
  #11  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
You should look into a more aggressive cam. I have the HKS and the sim says I'm lacking a lot of horses because of the Mild HKS cams. fyi

Mikey
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #12  
evodude32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
You should look into a more aggressive cam. I have the HKS and the sim says I'm lacking a lot of horses because of the Mild HKS cams. fyi

Mikey
Ya I'm def not a fan of the HKS 280 cams by any means, like I stated in my post above it's out of cam for sure. The cams are holding me back along with the back pressure issue I am having. I'm just not too sure on what cams to go with, it's between kelford 280s and the FP4R's. I have looked at the BF 272's but I don't know how well they would do with a stroker considering they are a really high strung (RPM) cams,, hmmm decisions decisions..
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #13  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Very nice. Not bad at all. 1.0 CF?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 11:50 PM
  #14  
evodude32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Very nice. Not bad at all. 1.0 CF?
Not sure on that but I think it was at 1.0CF or 1.025? Not sure I will double check tomorrow. The dyno sheet I posted was SAE uncorrected numbers, as in the 622whp was done at that very spot/moment with weather conditions on the dyno, so no correction factors going on, it was about 75 degrees in the shop with about 20% humidity. Altitude where we were at was at 4980 feet, so the car was lazy coming onto boost. I lost about 3lbs of boost going from where I live (2700ft.) to the dyno.

Last edited by evodude32; Jun 17, 2010 at 12:26 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #15  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Right on. Where is JMfabrications anyway?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:16 PM.