PlanoEvo's 2.3 EF3
PlanoEvo, have you seen the results of the other 2.3L EF3 that was posted here? Huge difference between your results and theirs. I called the other guy's graph laggy and was told it was running properly aside from some wga issues. Wga settings, as we all know, can make or break spool up, but there is an almost 1k rpm difference in torque delivery between your two graphs. Granted, there are some mod differences (cams, IM, he even has a stock IC) and your motor is higher compression, but the differences are pretty pronounced...
These are results I was expecting from a 2.3L mid-size stock frame turbo. I would take this powerband over any big peak power turbo any day.
These are results I was expecting from a 2.3L mid-size stock frame turbo. I would take this powerband over any big peak power turbo any day.
PlanoEvo, have you seen the results of the other 2.3L EF3 that was posted here? Huge difference between your results and theirs. I called the other guy's graph laggy and was told it was running properly aside from some wga issues. Wga settings, as we all know, can make or break spool up, but there is an almost 1k rpm difference in torque delivery between your two graphs. Granted, there are some mod differences (cams, IM, he even has a stock IC) and your motor is higher compression, but the differences are pretty pronounced...
These are results I was expecting from a 2.3L mid-size stock frame turbo. I would take this powerband over any big peak power turbo any day.
These are results I was expecting from a 2.3L mid-size stock frame turbo. I would take this powerband over any big peak power turbo any day.
Most definitely its a blast on the street! I also had the HKS 4.11 gears installed in my transmission which take a slight bit away in grunt but allows much more useable gears as I'm getting good traction on my 255s and I can get over 25# in 1st and take it out to 53mph



