FFTEC2.4L+6466 results :)
#1
FFTEC2.4L+6466 results :)
Hi all I thought id share my results with my new setup the car was completely built by FFTEC out of the bay area here's a mod list or what I can remember at least lol I couldnt be happier with the results I wanted a big powerband and thats exactly what I got these numbers are on a mustang dyno
FFTEC built 2.4L wesco 9/1 CR, stock crank, kelford 272s
FFTEC built trans, hks 4.11fd, quartermaster twin
FFTEC intake manifold/throttle body
FFTEC double pumper FIC2150
PTE6466 ETS manifold, PTE WG, tial BOV
ETS 4"intercooler and short route piping
Stock ignition
Last edited by mynx87; May 1, 2013 at 08:09 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolving Member
iTrader: (21)
to the OP, great results, car seems solid! I like how you have full boost at 5k! thats nice! wonder if the 4.11 gears contribute to that! im on the fence about dropping my 4.5FD for a 4.11 and have the same setup as you, will be doing my 6466 this week as well..
#12
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
doubt it since they can just run tighter gap to reduce spark blowout. besides its on a mustang dyno and its a big motor with big turbo im sure the kelford 272s could be upgraded, but sometimes 30-40hp is a sacrifice for a better idling car :-p
to the OP, great results, car seems solid! I like how you have full boost at 5k! thats nice! wonder if the 4.11 gears contribute to that! im on the fence about dropping my 4.5FD for a 4.11 and have the same setup as you, will be doing my 6466 this week as well..
to the OP, great results, car seems solid! I like how you have full boost at 5k! thats nice! wonder if the 4.11 gears contribute to that! im on the fence about dropping my 4.5FD for a 4.11 and have the same setup as you, will be doing my 6466 this week as well..
#13
Thanks im super excited with the results im sure some 282 would make more power bit I dont want to sacrifice driveability and and some low end, I wanted to stretch out 4th for the 1320 thats why I went with the 4.11 rev limit is set to 8k right now if we have to well bump it to 8300 but we will see once im out there I cant wait ill post some street pulls I live in the boonies so lots of open road for a mostley street driven big turbo car theres nothimng like a 2.4 I went the 2.0 route already it wasnt fun untill your really pushing the car, the reason why the car has a stock ignition is that there were two 700+ cars that had ignition problems with cop's on them that took oit both head gaskets they put the stock ignition back on problem solved, the highest car has 777 on stock ignition
#14
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Thanks im super excited with the results im sure some 282 would make more power bit I dont want to sacrifice driveability and and some low end, I wanted to stretch out 4th for the 1320 thats why I went with the 4.11 rev limit is set to 8k right now if we have to well bump it to 8300 but we will see once im out there I cant wait ill post some street pulls I live in the boonies so lots of open road for a mostley street driven big turbo car theres nothimng like a 2.4 I went the 2.0 route already it wasnt fun untill your really pushing the car, the reason why the car has a stock ignition is that there were two 700+ cars that had ignition problems with cop's on them that took oit both head gaskets they put the stock ignition back on problem solved, the highest car has 777 on stock ignition