Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Big turbos (6766/3794). Low boost numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 07:02 AM
  #1  
Mattlws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Utica, Michigan
Big turbos (6766/3794). Low boost numbers?

Just curious I have my 2.0 and 6766 combo set at 20 psi almost as a break in stage. I am awaiting fuel and better weather to turn the boost up where it should be. It makes me curious though if anybody had actually dyno'd their big turbos on the low boost setting. (Surely someone has)

62,64,6766, or a 3794 would probably be comparable. Looking for 20-25 psi numbers. It really is irrelevant but the car feels strong even on the pump fuel at that level with very conservative timing.

Again I don't want someone to tell me what my car is making. I want to know what others are doing.

Thank you

Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 07:21 AM
  #2  
Silvermike's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Trinidad
do a 3rd gear log and post a VD if you want ure thread in this section

FWIW

on a 2.3/ 6765 combo @ 23psi on 93 i made 450
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 07:53 AM
  #3  
Mattlws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Utica, Michigan
Nice. That is similar. Probably much more torque than me but still comparable I would think.

I have not used the VD yet but it is not a bad idea. I will post a pull after work today.

Thank you
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 12:00 PM
  #4  
BillSpec's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Behind a laptop in FLA
Aem ems break in tune I did for a member on here... I have to find the graph but it was a buscher cam ff 3794 on 93 oct made 500@19psi.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 06:18 PM
  #5  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
The DSport Cam test was done at 21psi on an HTA 86 and topped out around 600whp. Those turbos could make even more possibly.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2014 | 07:38 PM
  #6  
silverofs's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: s.l.c ut
First pull on the Dyno during tuning was 20psi and it made 460 I think. 6766 bb
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 04:24 AM
  #7  
droppinbottom's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi Texas
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...s-monster.html

Thats got mine in it.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 03:28 PM
  #8  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
On a conservative tune on a 2.L I was 496 at 19psi. 19psi, 92 octane, 11* at 8k.
Reply
Old May 20, 2014 | 11:59 PM
  #9  
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: KSA
I made on 14.5 psi 459whp and 23-24psi 601whp all those number was done on 91oct . My car has 2.1L and 6766 t4
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2014 | 10:31 AM
  #10  
05_evo_mr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Casper ,wy
548hp on a mustang dyno in Denver (mile high altitude) on 6765 91oct
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #11  
Anarchy99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: Orlando/ Kissimmee
739whp @ 29psi 3794 2.4LR by TTP on Dynojet 424x
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2014 | 04:44 PM
  #12  
lunchbox23's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: lancaster ca
Seems like the turbos are out of there range when ran in the lower boost maps or curves similar sized turbos should be used
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2014 | 06:45 PM
  #13  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
That was my experience. I was down power on the 3794 compared to the 3586 at 26psi...like 50whp.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2014 | 01:13 PM
  #14  
Anarchy99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Originally Posted by lunchbox23
Seems like the turbos are out of there range when ran in the lower boost maps or curves similar sized turbos should be used
It depends on the displacement and engine configuration when making that determination.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 04:41 PM
  #15  
Benja's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, Australia.
2.4LR, built head, 92 octane.
- 6262, 511whp at 23psi, 12* at 7500
- 6466, 554whp at 26psi, 10* at 7500
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:27 PM.