Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Clarification between the 4G63 and EVO engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 03:45 PM
  #16  
Bimmubishi's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 764
Likes: 1
From: Boston
The Evo 1-3 have larger throttle bodies, and different camshafts than the 2G engines. Rumored also to have a lighter crank but I can't back that one up.

The intake manifold is also different on the 2G than on the 1-3 Evos.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 03:47 PM
  #17  
Max Power's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Very interesting thread. What about cylinder head interchangeability? Will any 4g63 head bolt up to the Evo8 block and have all the necessary accessory provisions?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #18  
MrMejia's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Oceanside
4G63 RULES!!!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #19  
Bimmubishi's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 764
Likes: 1
From: Boston
Unfortunately no because, mainly the 4-8 were reversed. The timing belt was on the opposite side, as the Evo4-8 have belts on the right hand side.

The best engine, in my opinion, concieved from factory only parts would be a Galant engine with Evo 8 rods, pistons and the Evo III 16g. It would use a 1G cylinder head and Evo cams.

The Evo 8 turbo is much better, no doubt but we're considering interchangeability, not an option in this theoritical situation I created.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #20  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Some clarification:
US GVR4 in 91-92 did NOT come with cyclone intake...they are identicle to 90-91 DSM engine other than intake and intercooler piping.

There are LOTS of similarities between DSM turbo engines and the evo8 engine, BUT the differances are enough to make actual interchangability completely unrealistic.

There are some things about the evo8 engine that are almost funny how much they are the same as dsm engines. It's like they seriously just took a 2g turbo block, and stuck it in an evo8 backwards.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #21  
denile's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: 18235
Originally Posted by VTEC Killer
2nd GEN DSM Turbo, 7 bolt crank, prone to crank walk, 4G63T engine ***note, the internal parts from this motor, including valves, rods, crank are all identical to the EVO4-9 motor. this motor also has a slightly different and better flowing cylinder head then the 1G DSM *** Pistons are a little different due to valve pocket size and location***

.
The 1st gen has the better flowing head and larger throttle body.Both are excellent upgrades for the 2nd gen.2nd gens also have a higher compression ratio but the 1st gens have bigger rods and better cams.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #22  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by Apex Buddy
Except the EVOI which was powered by the galant VR-4 motor... Grassroots magazine has an excellent article on the evolution of the evo. pick it up if you can.
The Galant VR4 also has the 4G63.

Keith
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #23  
berkey's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Dominica
so will the evo viii pistons and rods fit in to a 2g evo iii with no mods and will the piston rings of the evo iii fit the evo viii pistons with no mods?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:16 AM
  #24  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
I know this is sort of off topic but how do the EVO 8-9 rods compare to the rods of the 90-91 4G63 DSM. I know the 93-99 DSMs had weaker rods than the 90-91 "big rods" as they were referred to but how do the EVO's compare?

BTW, the EVO motor is obviously just a newer better version of the 4G63. Its just improved! Also, since its reversed, it cant be dropped in DSMs and things alike, but that doesnt make it not a classic 4G63
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:34 AM
  #25  
sblvro's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
the engine numenclature might be the same but evo's were made by ralliart hence the internals were different compared to the 4G63 we know about in the DSM. From Evo 1-9, there is a different factory that manufactures evolutions altogether and from previous spec sheets of evo IV-IX, there were a lot of improvements of this engine which makes it unique to the evolution model only.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:39 AM
  #26  
Rez90's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
From: Flemington, NJ
Originally Posted by VTEC Killer
ok im gonna break this down the best I can

Please note all these motors are original layout, engine on the driver side, tranny on the passenger side

1st Gen DSM turbo, has a 6 bolt crank, stonger rods, the big end of the rod is wider, comes with a 4G63T

1st GEN Non-Turbo Eclipse. Talon, Laser. non turbo, 7 bolt crank comes with a 4G63 (notice no " T " since its not turbo)

2nd GEN DSM Turbo, 7 bolt crank, prone to crank walk, 4G63T engine ***note, the internal parts from this motor, including valves, rods, crank are all identical to the EVO4-9 motor. this motor also has a slightly different and better flowing cylinder head then the 1G DSM *** Pistons are a little different due to valve pocket size and location***

2nd GEN Non-Turbo Eclipse, Talon, Laser. Comes with a 420A motor, its a Chryler motor, same as found in the older Neon.

US or JDM Spec Galant VR4 1991 and 1992 for the US models. Same motor as the 1st GEN DSM turbo, however it has a "cyclone" intake manifold. Slightly different design.

EVO I, II, III Same motor as the 2G DSM motor, except a different turbo, better flowing exhaust manifold.


Now this is when things change up a bit. Now the 4G63T engine becomes transverse, which means they flip it 180 degrees in the engine bay. So now the engine is on the passenger side and tranny is on the driver side.

EVO4-8 Transverse mounted 4G63T, same DESIGN as the 2nd GEN Eclipse engine but with improvements, better oil squirter design to eliminate the problem of crank walking. Various different cam designs, solid cams, hollow cams, different fuel mapping in the ECU. Better flowing intake and exhaust manifolds. Different turbochargers. They made improvements as each new model was released

All the 4G63T and 4G63 engines are pretty much the same design, slight updates here and there but overall the same functions, same parts, etc. Mitsu new they were onto a good thing when they built that motor, thats why hear we are 15 years later and they are still using it.

Hope this helps.
Great post.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:39 AM
  #27  
AJsGenerX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
I always thought the heads on the evolution were meant to handle much more boost.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:50 AM
  #28  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
I have seen a 7-bolt crank from a 2G DSM be dropped into an evo, with crower rods (made for a 2G as well) get put in that same motor. They are very very very very very similar. The thing that has changed the most over the years is the head. Evo head flows sooo much better than DSMs ever did.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 07:35 AM
  #29  
4G63DSM's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: In front of a Catia screen
Originally Posted by VTEC Killer
ok im gonna break this down the best I can

Please note all these motors are original layout, engine on the driver side, tranny on the passenger side

1st Gen DSM turbo, has a 6 bolt crank, stonger rods, the big end of the rod is wider, comes with a 4G63T

1st GEN Non-Turbo Eclipse. Talon, Laser. non turbo, 7 bolt crank comes with a 4G63 (notice no " T " since its not turbo)

2nd GEN DSM Turbo, 7 bolt crank, prone to crank walk, 4G63T engine ***note, the internal parts from this motor, including valves, rods, crank are all identical to the EVO4-9 motor. this motor also has a slightly different and better flowing cylinder head then the 1G DSM *** Pistons are a little different due to valve pocket size and location***

2nd GEN Non-Turbo Eclipse, Talon, Laser. Comes with a 420A motor, its a Chryler motor, same as found in the older Neon.

US or JDM Spec Galant VR4 1991 and 1992 for the US models. Same motor as the 1st GEN DSM turbo, however it has a "cyclone" intake manifold. Slightly different design.

EVO I, II, III Same motor as the 2G DSM motor, except a different turbo, better flowing exhaust manifold.


Now this is when things change up a bit. Now the 4G63T engine becomes transverse, which means they flip it 180 degrees in the engine bay. So now the engine is on the passenger side and tranny is on the driver side.

EVO4-8 Transverse mounted 4G63T, same DESIGN as the 2nd GEN Eclipse engine but with improvements, better oil squirter design to eliminate the problem of crank walking. Various different cam designs, solid cams, hollow cams, different fuel mapping in the ECU. Better flowing intake and exhaust manifolds. Different turbochargers. They made improvements as each new model was released

All the 4G63T and 4G63 engines are pretty much the same design, slight updates here and there but overall the same functions, same parts, etc. Mitsu new they were onto a good thing when they built that motor, thats why hear we are 15 years later and they are still using it.

Hope this helps.
this guy is pretty darm smart.. .everything is correct expcept for his comment about the 2G head flowing better than the old 1G head. On a lightly modded street car the significantly smaller ports of a 2g seem to work a little better, but when you throw a huge turbo and boost the heck out of the 1g motor, the larger ports ultimately flow more air... ( all the crap about port velocity being higher on the 2g head goes right out the window with tons of boost....At higher boost the pressure becomes the ultimate factor in dictating the amount of air entering the cylinder head... Resonance tuning becomes neglible..)


When you get right down to it, every 4G63 is an iron block, closed deck, aluminum head DOHC. Bore and stroke remain unchanged no matter what side the transmissions sits.. Each iteration get tweaks meant to imporive something, or mitigate terrible things like emissions...( major reason for the 2G's little ports...)

Last edited by 4G63DSM; Oct 24, 2007 at 07:39 AM. Reason: more info
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #30  
nos51's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: miami
great thread for a 4g63/mitsu newb like myself
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:20 PM.