Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Which exhaust makes most power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #16  
MaxR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 1
From: Washington
MJ Fererra rationalized some adaptive ecu explanation because he needs to live in denial about his failures. Exhausts produce power and the ecu isn't going to cut boost unless you're using some crap gas.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #17  
sayanara's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I never believed the tapering(increasing) diameter theory. The things that are important would be how the exhaust is made to make the best use of pressure waves.

There are alot of exhausts there that are good and bargains. But the 'best' to me would be the lightest and the biggest for the appropriate application. I'd venture to say a good 3inch stainless steel downpipe, a light(ti) cat delete, and a ti catback. Ti saves alot of weight, and extra weight is wasted power. Thats my opinion.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 07:59 PM
  #18  
Mr. Stock's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, Florida
Originally Posted by VTECH8TR
Wow you got sensitive here. I was only stating the truth, TRUST me i know what i am telling you and i have had my car on a dyno ALOT more times than you. All you have to do is OPEN your eyes and see it. But maybe you didn't install is someone else did, that is why you don't know this .

No, not sensitive at all I know it's hard on the internet as there's no tone inflection. If I came across as a jerk, I apologize. But I want real, hard information. Not I read it somewhere or heard it from the guy around the corner. As we all know, the internet can be one of the largest sources of disinformation. But...to get back on track, do you really believe that on a mostly stock car, one more resonator is going to make that much of a difference? We're talking about a tube, 10" long or so, with perforations on the inside. No protrusions but perforations. Hard to believe...with the RM01A having one less flange/joint than most systems, that has to be worth something. Even a small lip will cause reversion and hurt flow.

As for the installation, I've spent the past five years heavily modifying a third gen 7, mostly with my own two hands. The whole point of the Evo was to try and avoid mods altogether (that worked!) and not waste any more time working on cars. But I will say this; I laid my hands on the exhaust outside the box and there's no way to insert your fingers and feel the inside of the resonator. It's too far back in the piping. Unless you have really long fingers. Dunno. Also, I purchased the exhaust in Orlando and if you read my post, you know it won't fit inside the Evo without sticking one end out the window. Not exactly something one should do in a new car, in Florida, for a four hour trip. So I had it installed by someone else. Believe me, I have the cuts, stains and dirty nails to "prove" my prowess under the hood!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #19  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by Mr. Stock
No, not sensitive at all I know it's hard on the internet as there's no tone inflection. If I came across as a jerk, I apologize. But I want real, hard information. Not I read it somewhere or heard it from the guy around the corner. As we all know, the internet can be one of the largest sources of disinformation. But...to get back on track, do you really believe that on a mostly stock car, one more resonator is going to make that much of a difference? We're talking about a tube, 10" long or so, with perforations on the inside. No protrusions but perforations. Hard to believe...with the RM01A having one less flange/joint than most systems, that has to be worth something. Even a small lip will cause reversion and hurt flow.

As for the installation, I've spent the past five years heavily modifying a third gen 7, mostly with my own two hands. The whole point of the Evo was to try and avoid mods altogether (that worked!) and not waste any more time working on cars. But I will say this; I laid my hands on the exhaust outside the box and there's no way to insert your fingers and feel the inside of the resonator. It's too far back in the piping. Unless you have really long fingers. Dunno. Also, I purchased the exhaust in Orlando and if you read my post, you know it won't fit inside the Evo without sticking one end out the window. Not exactly something one should do in a new car, in Florida, for a four hour trip. So I had it installed by someone else. Believe me, I have the cuts, stains and dirty nails to "prove" my prowess under the hood!
Do a search on Buschurs staged upgrade posts. He gives you everything you need to know with Dyno results, Hell he is the only one here that does this and we gotta thank him for that.

Don't get me wrong the Fujitsubo is an Awesome exhaust, i was just not happy on how quiet it was and i did not like the resonators. Of course you have to compromise for the noise. The more HP you make by adding parts the more it will be noticeable.

Last edited by VTECH8TR; Oct 12, 2005 at 08:10 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #20  
Mr. Stock's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, Florida
Originally Posted by MaxR
MJ Fererra rationalized some adaptive ecu explanation because he needs to live in denial about his failures. Exhausts produce power and the ecu isn't going to cut boost unless you're using some crap gas.
LOL, too funny Max. I think it's easy to say that and dismiss the test altogether but it'd be good to have someone really familiar with the stock ECU's operation to comment. I went to a tuning session recently at Central Florida Turbo with Jester tuning the car. We had boost fluctuation issues with the UTEC/ABC combo and the stock ECU would not let boost go above 16psi in the upper rpm range. Now some of the theory was the stock cat was too much of a restriction. But the stock ECU really fought increasing boost levels. I know the optional MAP sensor is supposed to help, but the ECU did try to cut boost.

Let's speak theoretically...if the ECU does "jump" maps to keep things in proper order, what prevents reflashed ECU's from doing the same? Tabular values are modified. Perhaps the modifications extend to all tables? Or is there only one table of values?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #21  
Mr. Stock's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, Florida
Originally Posted by VTECH8TR
Do a search on Buschurs staged upgrade posts. He gives you everything you need to know with Dyno results, Hell he is the only one here that does this and we gotta thank him for that.

Don't get me wrong the Fujitsubo is an Awesome exhaust, i was just not happy on how quiet it was and i did not like the resonators. Of course you have to compromise for the noise. The more HP you make by adding parts the more it will be noticeable.

No, I know. I think you're a bit more serious about modding your Evo than I am in which case, a higher flowing exhaust will make a difference. I'm stopping! I swear! No more mods for me. I needed another 30hp or so and I think with a reflash and MBC I'll have it.

I definitely respect Dave and do thank him for much good info.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #22  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by Mr. Stock
No, I know. I think you're a bit more serious about modding your Evo than I am in which case, a higher flowing exhaust will make a difference. I'm stopping! I swear! No more mods for me. I needed another 30hp or so and I think with a reflash and MBC I'll have it.

I definitely respect Dave and do thank him for much good info.
I suggest HKS 264's, a Hallman, and last but not least a Jestr flash. You will be more than happy and have no idling issues to deal with.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #23  
Matthew333's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: QC/Mesa, Arizona(85143)
you wont stop modding...just put it off for a while. The ecu will richen the mixture over time to match the factory parameters- when you throw the exhaust on, t bo flows more air- car feals "faster" because it runs lean- eventually the ecu learns and adjust air fuel to the correct ratio- you flow more fuel and air, but the initial hp is higher. it may continue to have even hp numbers as packing blows out.........
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #24  
TurboSaleen#163's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
I have the Buschur Exhaust and turbo back and love the sound and the results I have gotten out of it.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 PM.