Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Guess my HP! Winner receives a pat on the back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #31  
BJai02's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
315hp/310lb
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #32  
hel_if_ino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Originally Posted by BJai02
315hp/310lb
Close, as I posted on the last page though I pulled 305hp/310tq
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 06:46 AM
  #33  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
hel if ino:

Did you manage to find an atm to test the 2step boost, was curious on the times. I took off - had to get home to tuck in the kids
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 07:30 AM
  #34  
Evo_Bill's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
What could I get for hp?

3" invidia TBE no cat.
3" o2 housing SS
SS header feeling cheap
fuel pump 255 lb
hks hard pipe intake
hks hard pipe upper/lower
hks ssq
hks FMIC
93oc

05 RS considering my 10.5 hotside w/ flash
same eastscoast
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #35  
hel_if_ino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
hel if ino:

Did you manage to find an atm to test the 2step boost, was curious on the times. I took off - had to get home to tuck in the kids
Didn't find a damn atm, but the dood let me make a pass... I did ok, ran a 7.96@87 with a 1.72 60ft. I was actually bogging in the hole, didn't do that on the street but I guess I had more grip on the track, it was f'king fast though, almost beat a turbo mustang.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #36  
mikiblueeyes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: FAAAR FAAAR AWAAY :)
if on stock 03 turbo, then 330WHP on Dynojet / 285WHP Mustang dyno.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #37  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Its kind of funny how things work out in the whp game

Here we have an excited customer obviously looking for good power delivery

Sadly, it was not to be

As a tuner, being able to "feel" and "hear" what a car is doing and having the experience to understand when a car is not right mechanically is what gives you the ability to get good results and avoid disasters

When tuning this car it was clear that the powert was not there given the mods, boost, timing and a/f - looking out the back of the car and seeing the tell tale bluw oil smoke was another clue

I personally conducted a compression test and found a week cyl about 28 psi lower than the others - a swirt of oil brought it right up to the others

on a 4 cyl car = you are not going to make good power on 3 cyls - sorry

My suggestion was to lift the head and hopefully its a head gasket

Obviously, you are at the track racing the car

Hopefully your next step is not pulling the entire motor

Sorry your car did not make the power you wanted but its not going to happen with a weak cyl
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 07:18 PM
  #38  
hel_if_ino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Its kind of funny how things work out in the whp game

Here we have an excited customer obviously looking for good power delivery

Sadly, it was not to be

As a tuner, being able to "feel" and "hear" what a car is doing and having the experience to understand when a car is not right mechanically is what gives you the ability to get good results and avoid disasters

When tuning this car it was clear that the powert was not there given the mods, boost, timing and a/f - looking out the back of the car and seeing the tell tale bluw oil smoke was another clue

I personally conducted a compression test and found a week cyl about 28 psi lower than the others - a swirt of oil brought it right up to the others

on a 4 cyl car = you are not going to make good power on 3 cyls - sorry

My suggestion was to lift the head and hopefully its a head gasket

Obviously, you are at the track racing the car

Hopefully your next step is not pulling the entire motor

Sorry your car did not make the power you wanted but its not going to happen with a weak cyl
Al, where are you coming off? I didn't have any problems with the power delivery... it went just fine. I was "hoping" for more, no big deal. Since you mention the smoke, the EVO 9 you dyno'd immediately after mine was exhausting the same amount of smoke, as noted by others watching the dyno. I thought you told me it was 20psi below?? Either way, you can't tell me this is the only '03 evo you have seen to exhibit this kind of behavior, with #3 being low, but within tolerance. It seeming to become more of a "trait" with '03s here and there, not all, but more often now... could that be because of the mileage?? Who knows...

I had no issues with the tune, I love the tune, I love the power, I love the launch control, and the smooth idle, props Al. It should have made more, is all... As far as extracting it, who the hell knows I hav always felt, since day one, that I had a slightly weaker EVO, than fellow EVO owners similar setups... maybe I just need to buy a 9, and have you tune that one right?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 11:41 PM
  #39  
HxllxMan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Tahiti, French Polynesia


How much mileage your car have now?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 06:22 AM
  #40  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by hel_if_ino
Didn't find a damn atm, but the dood let me make a pass... I did ok, ran a 7.96@87 with a 1.72 60ft. I was actually bogging in the hole, didn't do that on the street but I guess I had more grip on the track, it was f'king fast though, almost beat a turbo mustang.
1.72 60ft? Man I got to learn that 2 step. I may have to politely show up next week with $40 cash and some smoothies durring some down time.
I ran a 8.045@88.739mph w/t a 1.798 60' (still havent changed stock catback)- I cant figure my ET in respect to mph - shifting?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #41  
hel_if_ino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Originally Posted by HxllxMan


How much mileage your car have now?
43,xxx
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #42  
hel_if_ino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
1.72 60ft? Man I got to learn that 2 step. I may have to politely show up next week with $40 cash and some smoothies durring some down time.
I ran a 8.045@88.739mph w/t a 1.798 60' (still havent changed stock catback)- I cant figure my ET in respect to mph - shifting?
damn, trap speed is high, your car sounds pretty damn fast, or maybe I just suck at driving... that is hella good with a stock catback and stock clutch.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #43  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by hel_if_ino
damn, trap speed is high, your car sounds pretty damn fast, or maybe I just suck at driving....
I think it may be the opposite, I shifted easy. Fast ET in respect to mph = quick shifting
Slow ET in respect to mph = loosing time between shifts
I think shifting speed has more effect on ET than mph
Moreover, I dont trust that track's mph.
Originally Posted by hel_if_ino
... that is hella good with a stock catback and stock clutch.
Hotside, cams, stiffer WG act, and no boost leaks. My catback has been adulterated: I permanently opened the internal flapper and and beveled the 2.5 flange where it meets the catdelete- helped.

10.5 Hotside alone gave me 0.27 sec in 1/8.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #44  
hel_if_ino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
I think it may be the opposite, I shifted easy. Fast ET in respect to mph = quick shifting
Slow ET in respect to mph = loosing time between shifts
I think shifting speed has more effect on ET than mph
Moreover, I dont trust that track's mph.
Hotside, cams, stiffer WG act, and no boost leaks. My catback has been adulterated: I permanently opened the internal flapper and and beveled the 2.5 flange where it meets the catdelete- helped.

10.5 Hotside alone gave me 0.27 sec in 1/8.
Crap, that may be something I will have to look into
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #45  
HxllxMan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Tahiti, French Polynesia
O2 + 10.5 + Methanol

Or get a 20g-9 and tell me
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 PM.