Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

So let's finally set it straight with aftermarket crank pulleys...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #31  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
Big $$$ ^
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 06:47 PM
  #32  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
I had a UR Crankpully, it worked and I had one last 72K miles.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #33  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by ifarted2
i just installed this one on my stroker motor. I know nhra rules require them at a certain speed
I just wish they were not so damn expensive! Not taking anything away from their intended performance of course...

However, I can't see too many people really having a true need for them.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #34  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
True that
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2006 | 08:51 AM
  #35  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
$280 vs $480 for the ati one
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #36  
mikiblueeyes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: FAAAR FAAAR AWAAY :)
I have one aswell and you can see difference right after install spool were about 100-200 RPM sooner. also dyno showed about 9-11 HP gain. Back in 2004. I got over 20,000 miles and no issues with it besides crack in the BUschur stage 3 head. That I had to through away. LOL

Piece
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #37  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
You had the UR or ATI mickey?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #38  
saev's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Mukilteo, WA
I've never seen an automotive issue so divisive.

The published advice against crank pullies comes from well known automotive engineers (Dinan, anyone?) and anyone that can read a physics book.

The published advice promoting crank pullies comes from either halfway-known pulley manufacturers and the "i or my friend has one and has had it for 3 million miles without a problem" kind of people.

It seems a pretty one-sided argument for any intelligent person.

Personally, if I'm going to risk total engine death, I'm going to do it with a 200 shot of nitrous with Jessica Alba as the prize for winning.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #39  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
I do not have a crank pulley on my Evo, but I do have one on my race car. I have the 4 piece UR pulley set and have had ZERO problems with them. Almost everyone in the SR20DE/T community runs them and I have yet to hear a problem from the pulleys.

The engine with pulley has been in the race car since aug 02. I have been beating the crap out of the car in door-to-door racing and no bearing failure from the pulley.

I am in the middle of an engine swap on the race car since I will be in a new class in SCCA. I just swaped the entire UR pulley set to the newer engine
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #40  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
None for me
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 02:00 AM
  #41  
ZyBeR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere on the Planet
I got the ATI in mine...

Reply
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #42  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
Did you notice a performance gain even?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 08:27 AM
  #43  
scottatyamaha's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
You would not expereince a performance gain with the ATI...but he has a built 2.2l engine in his car.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 08:32 AM
  #44  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
I have to disagree. A number of people have experienced a performance gain with the ATI on 2.0L motors. That, however, is the secondary benefit of a properly dampened motor. The primary benefit is the dampening of the natural harmonic frequencies and the longevity of your main bearings, and thus your motor.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 08:40 AM
  #45  
HassounEVO's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Even if it has no negative affects on your motor, I think the performance gain for a street driven car wouldn't be too substantial. For the money, you could do another mod that would be more useful. I had an ASP Pulley on my C5 vette with heads/cam and never had any problems. Was it worth the money and time, no.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:05 PM.