Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Case Study - Evo IX Stage II with Alky - stock vs Cosworth Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #31  
UpstateEVOVIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: in denial.
Nice to see the upgraded cams (regardless of brand) are finally starting to make a splash on the IX scene. Great gains, must say the thing that grabs me most is the overall powerband available on the cammed IX compared to what most experienced on the VIII with similar lift/duration. Short of Revolver type setups most cams on the VIII were high-rpm happy. These cams look to have a bit broader spectrum overall which I feel too often gets overlooked. Okay I'm done rambling.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #32  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by ONRAILS
The reason I made that post is the this dyno is reading like crank hp. And i have no idea what new softwear your talking about because AussieImports still has low reading softwear and they are the distribuotr of htese dyno's in the US? So does all the shops here. You would think the shops here would get the softwear first?

Honestly I think you guys are just putting in a 1.20 correction or something for everypull. Which you can do. Just to make your customers happy with big numbers. People liek big numbers. You are not going to see anther dynodynamics correctly calibrated read like this dyno. Ive seen 30+ dd dynos and never seen one read like this unless the correction factor was alterd which is really easy to do.

C'mon al. 400dd WHP on a bpu+ evo? only making 18psi at redline. Get real dude. You guys cant expect to gain as much hp off htese cams as these dynoplots are showing because how high this dyno is reading. Decrease your gains by about 15% and start there.


Well theory and practice are two seperate matters

The following car weighed in at 3,000 with driver with same dyno settings and
went 11.56 @ 117 mph - with the lower power pull

and then went 11.2 @ 120 mph with the higher power pull

This equates to perhaps the fastest USDM Evo 8 with stock turbo and stock ecu on pure gas no nos

I do not really place a lot of importance on dyno figures - however - it seems to me that these figures are fairly consistant with the results at the track





Again - the main issue with the cam comparision is to show the results with and without the cams and measure the difference from the cams - NOT to engage in a bench racing contest
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #33  
thatguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: milfburn
Gains were made from the

a. Cams

b. meth

c. cams and meth


The results are kind of inconclusive but time will tell.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 09:53 PM
  #34  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by thatguy
Gains were made from the

a. Cams

b. meth

c. cams and meth


The results are kind of inconclusive but time will tell.
The meth was on the car and at the same boost level before the cams
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 10:59 PM
  #35  
thatguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: milfburn
oops, sorry about that Al, thanks for clearing that up.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 11:01 PM
  #36  
mcwop23's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 9
From: Gainesville, FL
that's an awesome difference
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #37  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by thatguy
oops, sorry about that Al, thanks for clearing that up.
It was clearly stated in the first post and repeated multiple times.

ONRAILS apparently has a vendetta...

Good work, Al.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #38  
grenade's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Here
I want that.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 03:35 PM
  #39  
scoob4fun's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
AMS is about to do a back to back test on the Cosi and GSC cams. Then everybody will have results and we can stop this pissing match that has been going on for months about IX cams!
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 06:46 PM
  #40  
bolio's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: san antonio
Yeah, but aren't AMS and GSC business partners? I'd rather see a completely unbiassed shop do the tests.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #41  
ibanez_926's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by bolio
I'd rather see a completely unbiassed shop do the tests.
Is there really such a thing anymore?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 05:40 AM
  #42  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
Usually Buschur is pretty good about posting reality... i dont think the guys at AMS will do much different..... numbers are numbers, if a car is baseline 350 and GSC makes a 30 WHP and Cos 35, then whats there not to post ? either way they are selling a product.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #43  
Turbotoyzz's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Flushing, NY
Question: I am about to run a very similar setup. I would like to know what FMIC ,
o2, and Injection kit were you running on the car?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #44  
Toddevo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
man that cars power falls on its face after 4500. what happened Al????
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #45  
boomn29's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 1
From: Springfield, IL
Originally Posted by Toddevo 8
man that cars power falls on its face after 4500. what happened Al????
Tuning... I'm still trying to figure out where all that torque cams from on a 2.0l! That torque rises faster than sti torque-monster curves! But, that's OT here.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:17 PM.