Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

stock IC - bottleneck for a green turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #16  
Inprogress's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Does this concept of the IX bumper causing such a restriction to even those who are looking at upgrading their FMIC while on stock turbos? Should I disregard this in my scenario too?

Don't mean to hi-jack Abner, I'll delete if you want .
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #17  
SlowCar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #18  
MR. Birdie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
I really hope Tuning Technologies have a opening tomorrow. If so i'm going to get my blitz intercooler install and go for another retune.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #19  
SlowCar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
please show us your dynoplot
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #20  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
coughbumperbeamdeletecough...ahh my achin lungs
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #21  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
I have not seen big gains on the green without all the supporting mods
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 11:37 PM
  #22  
sikrsix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 2
From: Maine W/NJ Tags! FTP!!!
Wasnt the IX bumper design already been proven to be better design then the VIII?


According to Corky Bell's book on Designing Turbo Charged Systems, "Maximum Boost" on page 58, it shows a similar design to the IX's (roughly speaking) as being "better" that the VIII's "poor". (his ratings are: poor - better - best)

The best design according to him would be a slightly smaller opening than the IC cooling plate area, that would actaully be slightly tilted inwards to gather the air and force it though the fins. Sorry I don't have a way to diagram it all, but put simply:

*Poor: The air can run around the outside edges on a wide open inlet

Poor Example: ________ the solid line represents the fin area, nothing to stop the air from flowing around the IC's edges

*The "Better" Example: Below,the air gets directed to and through the fins with the "scoop" that has walls that angled outwards (wider in front to narrower at the IC.)

\______/ solid line is the fin area - air flow is from top to bottom

*The "Best" Example: Below, the slightly smaller than fin area opeing that gets wider as it goes towards the IC is "BEST" in his theory because it "forces" the most air through the fins.

/______\ same deal, only opening is smaller - air flow is from top to bottom

^ The IX = The best design ..

Another thing, why are you trying to use an intercooler desgined for 300hp when you're trying to pass that by as much possible?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 12:36 AM
  #23  
fusionchicken's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: socal
interesting i'd like to find out more about which front bumper has better flow.

sikrsix what you're saying makes sense, but directing air can't beat ALLOWING more air which is an issue with surface area, or how exposed a FMIC is IMHO.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 05:34 AM
  #24  
SlowCar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I have not seen big gains on the green without all the supporting mods
Al, what have you see or what combo youu have tuned saw the most gains?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 06:14 AM
  #25  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
one thing to consider is that many if not most of the bigger intercoolers are considerably thicker then the stock intercooler. the extra area on the endcaps isn't going to make as big of a difference as a 50-100%increase in thickness. regardless of which bumper you have, the 8 or 9, thickness will benefit you, whereas the extra frontal area may not with the 9.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #26  
TURBODAWG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
From: NC
I made over 400 whp as can be seen in my signature on the stock FMIC and piping, stock airbox also. On another car we ran it 3 times with an APS upgraded intercooler. Recorded boost pressure and HP numbers. We switched back to the stock intercooler on the dyno. We gained roughtly 1 to 1.5 hp by switching to the stock FMIC. This car had a WR-9 turbo (20G-9-5 with TME internals). It made in 420 whp range and 450 ft lbs of torque.

IMO, an upgraded FMIC will help out in the warmer weather, but when the air temps are 60 degrees or less, the stock FMIC will do a fine job even with the bigger stock based turbos.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #27  
mitsuorder's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (106)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by TURBODAWG
I made over 400 whp as can be seen in my signature on the stock FMIC and piping, stock airbox also. On another car we ran it 3 times with an APS upgraded intercooler. Recorded boost pressure and HP numbers. We switched back to the stock intercooler on the dyno. We gained roughtly 1 to 1.5 hp by switching to the stock FMIC. This car had a WR-9 turbo (20G-9-5 with TME internals). It made in 420 whp range and 450 ft lbs of torque.

IMO, an upgraded FMIC will help out in the warmer weather, but when the air temps are 60 degrees or less, the stock FMIC will do a fine job even with the bigger stock based turbos.
/\
|
Exactly my thoughts on the subject as well. For us stock/stock like turbo guys in Texas a larger i/c is more of a detonation deterrent during the sweltering summers. So for us it's more of the heat=detonation, less heat=less chance of detonation, less chance of detonation=more reliable power on the table. I know for me, any power I picked up from the addition of my AMS i/c was icing on the cake
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #28  
MR. Birdie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
Well I have an appointment for this coming Saturday for another re-tune with intercooler and test pipe.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #29  
ibanez_926's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by SlowCar
Al, what have you see or what combo youu have tuned saw the most gains?
chinese parts of course.

anyways i would imagine the i/c and the test pipe will help out mr. birdie considerably
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #30  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
My VIII made 409whp on a Dyno4mance Dyno Dynamics with the stock IC, which reads typical of the lower reading DDs. I've seen other cars make clese to 450whp on the stock IC with GT3076 turbos and trap 123-124mph.

I think a Green should be fine on the stock IC. Its not a restriction in my mind until you go 35R.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:18 AM.