Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Whats missing from my 2.3 Stroker&20gLT Setup????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #16  
lilevo1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Nor*Cal (Sacramento)
keep us up dated.. i wanna see ur numbers
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #17  
JMB8606's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by scorke
Bigger/better cams possibly?

Scorke
I was told hks 272/272 were a good match. What do you recommend without having to upgrade springs and retainers.

Originally Posted by cpoevo
I think you are good where you are at. Give me a holler when you go get tuned I want to go with you. This is Andy by the way.
I will andy
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #18  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
GSC S1's, HKS 280's, anything with more duration or lift, our cams are weaksauce in the cam world nowadays, still good gains over stock but still a lot left on the table.

Scorke
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #19  
Vigo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by scorke
^ No he will not, your wrong, 530 ft lbs maxxx.

Scorke
What do you mean. On David Buschurs car on a Mustang dyno the FP Green turbo produced 450whp and 450 torque with stock displacement. On a typical Dynojet that would be about 515 torque and than add 15 percent more displacement than you will have about 595 torque.

Last edited by Vigo; Mar 12, 2007 at 11:59 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #20  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Yep your right thats exactly how it works, it's all just multiplying by blah and blah. These turbo's can only produce so much hp, lets say 450 whp. Since turbo's have to spool there is time between spoolup and max hp, the earlier the hp is made the greater the tq is as that point, it is impossible, without a huge shot of nitrous to make 600wtq with this turbo/setup, believe me.

I'll put money on it...... A stroker does not ad 15 percent more tq on every turbo it will effect all of them differently.

If db's dyno is a heart breaker, pruven's is def a pick me up- here is a sheet from the highest tq out of a 16g I have seen thus far, on a DJ!!

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ight=sharkbite

Scorke
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #21  
Vigo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Thanks for the graph.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:55 PM
  #22  
Pd1's Avatar
Pd1
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
With those mods, on Cali 91, on that dyno, I predict 365whp/350wtq.

JMB, I sincerely hope you prove me wrong on this. However, aside from the stroker, I've got a good amount of experience with all of the other variables in this equation. Go strap it down and make a fool of me!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #23  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
You're missing a ported 65mm TB from WOT and an intake manifold ported to match.

You're missing an upper IC pipe.

You're missing more aggressive cams like the GSC S1s (make more power than GSC 272s) or the Cosi MIVEC cams if you have a 9.

Possibly an ARC intake if the gains reported at GST Motorsports are true AND repeatable on different cars. If you don't want to go with that, check out the people who have cut additional holes in the stock airbox top.

A test pipe or race cat.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:06 AM
  #24  
ONRAILS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
GSC S1's run no more duration or lift than HKS 272/272.. S2's on the otherhand are a different story.. If your looking for some GSC's hit up Marty @ injected performance.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:15 AM
  #25  
MRevolutionRed's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Green Book, NJ
Originally Posted by ONRAILS
GSC S1's run no more duration or lift than HKS 272/272.. S2's on the otherhand are a different story.. If your looking for some GSC's hit up Marty @ injected performance.
i would definetely give greg@GSC a call he is the best!! very helpful and the best customer service.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:18 AM
  #26  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by ONRAILS
GSC S1's run no more duration or lift than HKS 272/272.. S2's on the otherhand are a different story.. If your looking for some GSC's hit up Marty @ injected performance.
Here is a question I asked Greg @ GSC:


Thank you very much Greg. And just to double check, you're saying the new S1 cams will make more power than the V2 272's? Thanks again for your time.

He responded...yes.

And, in fact, the S1's run less duration than the 272's, and less lift IIRC on the intake cam. However, the ramp rates are much different and the lift on the exhaust cam is more.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #27  
ONRAILS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Here is a question I asked Greg @ GSC:


Thank you very much Greg. And just to double check, you're saying the new S1 cams will make more power than the V2 272's? Thanks again for your time.

He responded...yes.

And, in fact, the S1's run less duration than the 272's, and less lift IIRC on the intake cam. However, the ramp rates are much different and the lift on the exhaust cam is more.


And that confirms what i just said.. I was merely pointing out they aren't much more agressive than the hks 272's your talking 5-10whp here max maybe if that..

I was pointing out that he should step up to the s2's since hes built w/bigger turbo..

Thanks
Cass
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 06:17 AM
  #28  
thebluesky's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 6
From: Colorado
Never saw mention of an UICP, might benefit from a larger throttle body, and never saw mention of headstuds.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 06:40 AM
  #29  
Kee1pride's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 0
From: Houston,tx
do you guys think he'll be needing hks dli II as well?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 06:47 AM
  #30  
Azntoyhere's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Worcester
he is definitly missing Meth or Alcohol injection, witht hat alone he can turn up the boos t9 28 lbs and that would kick his *** once he stepp on the throttle, and i mean FP turbo is fine but he should go with like Bushur for the 50trim if he dont want to spend over4k for AMS but AMS is proven to produce more power. And he is set, and ARP headstuds ^_^
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 PM.