Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Full race not port matched?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #16  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I didn't say there would be no benefit to it if the head ports were bigger. I was saying the head ports AREN'T bigger. I don't know why there's carbon, but there's carbon all over my stocker, too, but my head ports weren't any bigger.

I also didn't say that NO manifold has bigger ports on the manifold side. I was just saying that it wasn't abnormal for them NOT to be gasket-matched. The BR ported stocker has been proven to outperform the Megan, so I think you're putting way too much stock in how the Megan looks instead of how it performs...
well david himself said the only manifold he would sugest instead of a stock ported was the Full Race, so i took his advice. in the long run, i think im going to improve on this manifold and put a healthy radius on there so the exhaust gas will not hit the flange like a wall.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #17  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Part of why it looks better is it's freshly ported and coated rather than used and dirty.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:04 PM
  #18  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
well david himself said the only manifold he would sugest instead of a stock ported was the Full Race, so i took his advice. in the long run, i think im going to improve on this manifold and put a healthy radius on there so the exhaust gas will not hit the flange like a wall.
I find it interesting that your first reaction is that you can easily improve upon a $900 part that has been proven to be the best. My first reaction would be to find out exactly if it's a true Full Race manifold, and if so, find out why they did it that way instead of hogging out the ports. I think that would be a smarter approach than assuming you are a superior manifold designer.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #19  
cfdfireman1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Macro FTW.

When you are in Macro mode, a little tulip flower will display on the screen. Macro mode goes away when you shut off your camera.

Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #20  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I find it interesting that your first reaction is that you can easily improve upon a $900 part that has been proven to be the best. My first reaction would be to find out exactly if it's a true Full Race manifold, and if so, find out why they did it that way instead of hogging out the ports. I think that would be a smarter approach than assuming you are a superior manifold designer.
never said i was, but as a mechaical engineer for the united states of america, i think i know when i see something that can be improved upon assuming this is the case.

and it is definitly a full race manifold. i got it from a company.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:11 PM
  #21  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Being a mechanical engineer for the gov't certainly doesn't qualify you for anything compared to expert manifold designers who have done flow bench testing and have proven to make more power. There may, in fact, be a way to improve this one, but I still don't understand why your first thought wouldn't be to ask Full Race why it was designed that way.

You bought THAT dirty, old, used manifold "from a company"? I would still verify with Full Race while also asking about the purpose behind the design.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #22  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Being a mechanical engineer for the gov't certainly doesn't qualify you for anything compared to expert manifold designers who have done flow bench testing and have proven to make more power. There may, in fact, be a way to improve this one, but I still don't understand why your first thought wouldn't be to ask Full Race why it was designed that way.

You bought THAT dirty, old, used manifold "from a company"? I would still verify with Full Race while also asking about the purpose behind the design.
well taking Fluid in Dynamics does. and i cant ask Full race, its Sunday, they are closed. i will try and get a hold of them tomorrow.

and yes, the kid had Speed Element take everything off for him and sell it for him. so in fact, i paid the owner of speed element through paypal and he peronally told me on the phone the manifold was a full race and there was nothing wrong with it. so im taking his word.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #23  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
this is the pics he sent me b4 he sold it to me.
Attached Thumbnails Full race not port matched?????-arc.jpg   Full race not port matched?????-snv30359.jpg   Full race not port matched?????-snv30360.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #24  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
Carbon always gets between the manifold and the head in the space that the gasket doesn't occupy. If you take the manifold off of your car, you will see the ring of carbon on the head too.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #25  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I find it interesting that your first reaction is that you can easily improve upon a $900 part that has been proven to be the best. My first reaction would be to find out exactly if it's a true Full Race manifold, and if so, find out why they did it that way instead of hogging out the ports. I think that would be a smarter approach than assuming you are a superior manifold designer.
What's even more interesting is he trashes a part that has been independantly tested to be one of, if not the best available and he has absolutley no idea what he's talking about.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #26  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Taking "Fluid in Dynamics" does what? Qualifies you to look at a proven manifold and immediately say you know how to improve it? I don't know man...more than once in this thread you said the Megan was so much better because of the piping being thinner and the ports being larger, yet we all know the Megan is a piece of crap that makes less power and cracks. I would say that fact puts your assessment of this Full Race in question.

Again, you may end up being right that there is something wrong with this particular manifold, but I'd talk to the experts about it before flying off the handle with a crazy thread. Oh wait, too late...
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #27  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
It looks like there is a step between the flange and the tubing, but maybe that is just the picture.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #28  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by wreckleford
Carbon always gets between the manifold and the head in the space that the gasket doesn't occupy. If you take the manifold off of your car, you will see the ring of carbon on the head too.
well this is kinda nice to hear.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #29  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Taking "Fluid in Dynamics" does what? Qualifies you to look at a proven manifold and immediately say you know how to improve it? I don't know man...more than once in this thread you said the Megan was so much better because of the piping being thinner and the ports being larger, yet we all know the Megan is a piece of crap that makes less power and cracks. I would say that fact puts your assessment of this Full Race in question.

Again, you may end up being right that there is something wrong with this particular manifold, but I'd talk to the experts about it before flying off the handle with a crazy thread. Oh wait, too late...
Give it up. His posts clearly show he has no idea what he's talking about. Someone trade him their Megan header so he can have the higher flowing header.

Last edited by robertrinaustin; Jun 3, 2007 at 04:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 04:26 PM
  #30  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by robertrinaustin
Give it up. His posts clearly show he has no idea what he's talking about. Someone trade him their Megan header so he can have the higher flowing header.

Rofl Copter.

He was told by Dave Buschur that it was the best choice, do you not like america or something?

Scorke
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 PM.