View Poll Results: What engine configuration would EVO M like to see Twin Scroll results on?
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll
Twin Scroll Testing...Let us know how you want it done!
Evolving Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: JHB
Long time......
A decent TS manifold will be the difference between amking power beyond 4500RPM and choking the heck out of the engine. IF you want teh read deal approach either get Geoffs Full race one ...or hand aroud for a while till mine are up for sale.
Also given you actualy need two independent EWG (be they 38mm machined to V-band or 44's) the cost for a true and proper TS wont come cheap. But then you know im never cheap...LOL
A
Hi Sal,
Long time......
A decent TS manifold will be the difference between amking power beyond 4500RPM and choking the heck out of the engine. IF you want teh read deal approach either get Geoffs Full race one ...or hand aroud for a while till mine are up for sale.
Also given you actualy need two independent EWG (be they 38mm machined to V-band or 44's) the cost for a true and proper TS wont come cheap. But then you know im never cheap...LOL
A
Long time......
A decent TS manifold will be the difference between amking power beyond 4500RPM and choking the heck out of the engine. IF you want teh read deal approach either get Geoffs Full race one ...or hand aroud for a while till mine are up for sale.
Also given you actualy need two independent EWG (be they 38mm machined to V-band or 44's) the cost for a true and proper TS wont come cheap. But then you know im never cheap...LOL
A
Yeah you right its gona be pricey anyway I look at it, the TS turbo was the cheap part...
My orginal plan when I bought this Turbo was to get a local tuner to fabricate me a manifold, this is still looks like the best option...
My other option is to get the .63 ATP housing for my GT3076 then it will bolt up and I will get the stealth look... (would prefer this as a bolt-on solution) But I'm struggling to get the kit without the Turbo...
Not really worried about high numbers more interested in GT3071 early torque like characterics and midrange grunt. Rolling run & Road Race Monster...
.
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
What exactly are you referring to with this comment? Are you a vendor here?
2.3, lets show the absolute best possible spool/tq numbers that can be achieved.
In all honesty, if your even thinking about doing lots of testing do it with both
The gains can be seen on a 2.0 or 2.3 just the overall results will be more impressive with a stroker I imagine
Scorke
In all honesty, if your even thinking about doing lots of testing do it with both
The gains can be seen on a 2.0 or 2.3 just the overall results will be more impressive with a stroker I imagine Scorke
Also what kind of kit will you be building? Top mount or bottom mount? Thanks
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Yo Pops good to hear from you man
Yeah you right its gona be pricey anyway I look at it, the TS turbo was the cheap part...
My orginal plan when I bought this Turbo was to get a local tuner to fabricate me a manifold, this is still looks like the best option...
My other option is to get the .63 ATP housing for my GT3076 then it will bolt up and I will get the stealth look... (would prefer this as a bolt-on solution) But I'm struggling to get the kit without the Turbo...
Not really worried about high numbers more interested in GT3071 early torque like characterics and midrange grunt. Rolling run & Road Race Monster...
.
Yeah you right its gona be pricey anyway I look at it, the TS turbo was the cheap part...
My orginal plan when I bought this Turbo was to get a local tuner to fabricate me a manifold, this is still looks like the best option...
My other option is to get the .63 ATP housing for my GT3076 then it will bolt up and I will get the stealth look... (would prefer this as a bolt-on solution) But I'm struggling to get the kit without the Turbo...
Not really worried about high numbers more interested in GT3071 early torque like characterics and midrange grunt. Rolling run & Road Race Monster...
.
Evolving Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: maryland
i vote 2.0 because i love stock block setups and liked to see things pushed but also a 2.3 would be nice just to see if its worth it for some people love that extra tq what are most 2.3 redline at ?
Evolving Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: JHB
Don't have the .63 only .82 which im about done with on testing etc. Full boost by 4500RPM. So drop by some time and we can catch up.
A
A
Yo Pops good to hear from you man
Yeah you right its gona be pricey anyway I look at it, the TS turbo was the cheap part...
My orginal plan when I bought this Turbo was to get a local tuner to fabricate me a manifold, this is still looks like the best option...
My other option is to get the .63 ATP housing for my GT3076 then it will bolt up and I will get the stealth look... (would prefer this as a bolt-on solution) But I'm struggling to get the kit without the Turbo...
Not really worried about high numbers more interested in GT3071 early torque like characterics and midrange grunt. Rolling run & Road Race Monster...
.
Yeah you right its gona be pricey anyway I look at it, the TS turbo was the cheap part...
My orginal plan when I bought this Turbo was to get a local tuner to fabricate me a manifold, this is still looks like the best option...
My other option is to get the .63 ATP housing for my GT3076 then it will bolt up and I will get the stealth look... (would prefer this as a bolt-on solution) But I'm struggling to get the kit without the Turbo...
Not really worried about high numbers more interested in GT3071 early torque like characterics and midrange grunt. Rolling run & Road Race Monster...
.
I voted for a 2.0 also... But I'll have another 2.3, 2.2, 2.1, 2.4 somewhere down the line...
Last edited by version 2 beta; Jan 24, 2008 at 06:15 PM.
I'm going 2.3L Stroker pretty soon so maybe that .82 might still work out...
Sal
.
