Ok for everyone out there. This is what we got out of my car with Brian Crower 272 cams and everything in my signature. The tune was done on a wideband and was reflashed by SG tuning in Reno, NV. The lower HP is on 91 pump at 21psi. The higher HP is on C12 and at 25psi spike tappering down to 22psi. The cams sound awesome if you want the almost stock sound. It has only a slight lobe at idle. It wraps up from 4000 rpm to 7500 rpm with slight power loss due to stock turbo not able to hold boost at higher psi and higher rpms.

What do you guys think of the graph.

Upated with new comparison of a Evo 8 10.5 turbo vs. Evo 9 turbo. Everything else is the same. Even the tune. It is the second graph that shows the turbo difference.

 

what graph?

 

Edit: Image was inserted correctly...

Great job on the power. How does the car feel? Dynojet?

 

I saw it, and damn, i am sold now, i was thinking about these cams and after seeing that you can't beat it for the price

 

that's pretty cool, im going to be installing my bc 272s on tuesday, i wonder how it'll react to my mods.

 

This was done through Data Log Lab the same graph that Mellon uses. Its feels amazing with and without race gas. It pulls hard. The graph is to show you the difference of power from pump to race and to show the power increase. If you guys want bigger cams and an awesome lobe get the Comp Cam 280+ from Forced Performance. They are overstocked and are selling them at cheap price.

 

i already have my cams and am already boosting a daily 25 track 27psi, but yeah 399 cams with springs isnt bad

 

Ya ok but!! what was ur power before the cams 91 and race gas...same boost,

 

I will try to post that up on here next I was trying to post the graph but was having issues. I will post the no cam one up tonight.
From looking at the graph I gained about 35-39whp from no cams to the Brian Crower 272's. I will keep you guys posted on the graph.

 

Ok cool,,,,Did you do springs with the cams
So this was on a 2005 evo_8 So this wasn't done on a dyno..
I know Data Log Lab so pretty close to a Mustang dyno..
My buddy logged his evo_9 with Data Log Lab he has a GT30R open wastegate
Meth/Nos (91 octane) Nos just for spool up 880 injectors... ect... And Data Log Lab gave him 450/440 if I remember correctly..And when he went to the Mustang dyno his numbers where right on,,,MD 430hp...

 

No springs or retainers. No not on a dyno yet because we dont have a dyno up here in Reno, nv.

 

Ok I have a big problem. When we bought the new Evoscan 2.2 to tune it had the files of all of my older runs. This is where the problem comes to play. Evoscan 2.2 had a problem reading widebands. So we unistalled and then installed Evoscan 2.1. Now in doing this it erased all of my old files. Dam n this suck. So from the graph in my original post it will show you the power differnece. Sorry guys.

 

No I think if you change from version to version it still keeps ur runs...

 

where did you buy them from? are the 272 better for low end torque than the 280?

 

Thats what we thought but it didn't. It was on my tuners computer. I'm really pist >>f because I really wanted to see a true difference from stock to cams.

I will give you guys a power comparison between the Brian Crower 272/272 and the Comp Cam 280/280. I get the 280's on Tuesday and the hallman on Wednesday. I will do the power comparison with the MBC that i have now so it will be the same setup.