thank you. now will it fit in a 35r hotside or no..

 

how wud u compare dis turbo wid da fp t4z 88hta ?

 

who is that turbo from?

 

and a 35R HTA makes more power than both then?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=361740

 

the t4z 88hta is a new turbo from forced performance (hta gt37r)

 

should make a tiny bit more if not the same as that turbo. I heard the HTA on the 37R didnt make as huge as an increase as it did on the 35R

 

the t4z 88hta is a new turbo from forced performance (hta gt37r)

 

sory guyz ,internet problem .....
wat i heard is that the hta gt35r will make more power than the 6265 ,and the t4z 88hta (hta gt37r ) will make more power than the hta gt35r .
i hope im not wrong as this is wat i heard from many here ..

 

why are you posting the same thing over and over on here??

 

Ill wait to either test it myself or find an unbiased test done by a outside source.. that test was done by FP themself..

 

Was the test done back to back w/out retuning for the 6265?

 

I had alot of questions (my post was removed apparently from their thread when yet I did nothing to justify its removal) about that testing especially since FP admits only that they are biased and refuse to release any of the relivant test data to support their claims of how the testing was performed. If it was anyone else but FP/ Bushur (with all due respect, lets be honest they are shown alot who of favoritism here) pulling that kind of non-sense testing without the supporting data, the forum would be up in arms about it.

Without quantifiable data who is to know anything useful other than whats spoon fed to you by the manufacturer of the rivaling product. Why not release the data if there is no discrepencies... I dont understand that.

Also if you overlook the questionable testing part of it and take it at face value (hard for me personally without more information) the 6265 is quite a bit larger than a 35r, so when they posted their results showing the bulk of the hta35r claim to more power was due to spooltime... thats a little expected. A 6262 as even AL said would be a closer match to the hta35r in that regard. Although agian without more testing logs or more data to show that per say the duty cycle on the boost solenoid, fuel, timing, etc were not a factor who knows if there is not some other contibuting conditions to those results.

Either way I am not so quick to be spoon fed information like that, so as far as I am concerned it was a plug by FP to sell their product... it had about as much information as a magazine ad. They just put in a forum instead.

 

in regards to what you said AL said ^^^ the 6162 when tested against a standard GT35R made within 1% of power on the entire graph. That test was done by precision themselves. I doubt it would compete with the HTA 35R considering its been proven how much power that makes over the STD 35R.

And even though this test was done was a POTENTIALLY bias source, we cannot ignore the performance of the HTA35R. That turbo has done nothing but impress me since it came out. It looks to be a bad *** turbo with great spool characteristics in reference to lag.

 

I should elaborate and say that I am not trying to discount the HTA35r's performance as we all know what it can do, rather I dont like the method in which we are being fed the test results only on the 6265 Precision by a rival manufacturer/ biased party refusing to give any more test data. As I said it is a larger unit than the HTA35r so I expected the difference in lag.

I just dont like the with-holding of information someone would need to properly understand the testing conditions... what compressor housing was on each unit, iats during the runs, sae, std, or uncorrected, etc?

sorry to railroad your thread, this is just my 2 cents. I did not see the 6262 testing you speak of, but that shows the 6262 is a more evently matched viable alternative to the HTA.

I am betting as more units get out and testing done, the 6262 or maybe a variant will become more proven.

 

I was sure plenty of people would be suspect of our testing, but to me that was not a good enough reason to not test it anyway.

I did say the PTE turbo had the typical bulet hole cover on it, a HTA35R only comes with one cover on it, I said they both had .82 housings, and correction was used but the CF was the same for both runs becasue they were done within a few hours of each other. It doenst matter if the ambient temps were 80F or 100F they were the same in both cases. I'll go check that thread in case this wasnt obvious in my existing posts and clarify.

You are correct however, as more 6265 and 6265 turbos get out there more and more people will see how it works.