Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

How does Twinscroll Work?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #16  
Dennis F's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 494
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Don't get your hopes up. Some people just don't "get it" and others are just sheep
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #17  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by Steve93Talon
The disadvantage of a smaller AR housing has nothing to do with it being twin scroll. Smaller AR open housings would have the same disadvantage over their larger AR counterparts within the same family.
You´re right! I guess that I was refering more narrowly to "gated" twinscroll housings like the 16G´s, as opposed to, "non-gated" twinscrolls, and that´s why I tried to qualify my reply to that effect.

The non-gated twin scrolls that TedB and Geoff use and favor are pretty much a no compromise housing. They may give up a wee bit of topend flow, but more than make up for it in improved spoolup velocity and pulse management.

The "gated"( i.e.16G) TS turbine housings, on the other hand, although enjoying certain twinscroll benefits also make certain compromises in the turbine inlet area. If you compare the turbine inlet area on a 10.5 to a turbine inlet on a 9.8, I am sure that you´ll see what I am getting at.

I was really only trying to say that the non-gated twinscroll housing designs in general make relatively fewer concessions in the turbine inlet area than internally gated twinscroll housings(i.e., 16G´s)do. This is due mostly to the convoluted troughs and protrusions required to cast and plumb the dual wastegate bypass ports perpendicular to the scroll axis, within the already restricted space of the turbine inlets. These casting proturbances are, by necessity, more intrusive on the two smaller A/R housings(9.0, &, 9.8) than it is on the 10.5, IMO.

Last edited by sparky; Mar 17, 2009 at 03:07 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 03:55 PM
  #18  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by Ted B
I'm not sure why that should be so difficult to understand. It's the difference between moving the TP from 20%-75% and feeling the engine respond quickly, or feeling like one is waiting for something to happen. A dyno cannot resolve this. I feel anyone who can make their way out of a paper bag can understand it.
i with that was true, it would save me writing countless emails and getting flamed on this forum regularly
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #19  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
small bump - modified mag is doing a small story on twinscroll in next month's issue, nothing too eye opening for anyone who read pg 1 of this thread tho
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #20  
riceball777's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
great info
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #21  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
a small bump -- the latest press release from BMW

"Finding new ways to expand the boundaries of what is possible with existing
BMW models has been the singular purpose of the craftsmen at BMW M. Now the
BMW X5 M and the BMW X6 M are the first all-wheel-drive models to offer the
remarkable performance, dynamic driving experience, athletic design, and
premium quality of a BMW M product.

Both models are powered by a newly-developed 4.4-liter V8 M engine delivering
555 hp at 6,000 rpm and 500 lb-ft of torque from 1500 to 5,650 rpm. This new
M engine is the world’s first with a pulse-tuned exhaust manifold encompassing
both rows of cylinders combined with high-performance twin-scroll twin turbo
technology."
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:45 AM
  #22  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Originally Posted by Steve93Talon
How would you figure that their manifold is not a pulse converter type, as dictated by the description above? Their manifolds run cyls 1 & 4 into one scroll and 2 & 3 into the other, thus separating pulses as much as possible. How is this any different than the OEM EVO manifold?
A pulse converter type manifold uses a particular runner geometry. It has nothing to do with cylinder pairing.
A true pulse converter will use a venturi shape at the runner end where it meets the collector/plenum. The venturi creates a pseudo-one-way valve that reduces exhaust reversion. This is done by the shape promoting a low loss coefficient to flow in one direction but an appreciably higher loss coefficient in flow the opposite direction.

A shallow angle merge collector flows well in both directions and would not be considered a pulse converter. The purpose of the shallow angle merge collector is to provide a low loss coefficient from runner to collector, but a high loss coefficient from runner to runner. Unfortunately, the loss coefficient from collector to runner is low, there by providing little flow restriction to exhaust reversion generated by the turbine.

Pulse converters are more conventionally used on single scroll diesel engines. The OEM EVO manifold has a venture profile in the runner if you look carefully. Much of it gets ported out when you port the manifold though. The gains are from increased flow area, but it would be interesting to see a company come out with a cast manifold with larger, smoother runners but still used the pulse converter profile.

Last edited by 03whitegsr; Apr 7, 2009 at 07:42 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 07:33 AM
  #23  
juanmedina's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: greenville, sc
So what happen to the test on subies?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 08:21 AM
  #24  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
A pulse converter type manifold uses a particular runner geometry. It has nothing to do with cylinder pairing.
A true pulse converter will use a venturi shape at the runner end where it meets the collector/plenum. The venturi creates a pseudo-one-way valve that reduces exhaust reversion. This is done by the shape promoting a low loss coefficient to flow in one direction but an appreciably higher loss coefficient in flow the opposite direction.

A shallow angle merge collector flows well in both directions and would not be considered a pulse converter. The purpose of the shallow angle merge collector is to provide a low loss coefficient from runner to collector, but a high loss coefficient from runner to runner. Unfortunately, the loss coefficient from collector to runner is low, there by providing little flow restriction to exhaust reversion generated by the turbine.

Pulse converters are more conventionally used on single scroll diesel engines. The OEM EVO manifold has a venture profile in the runner if you look carefully. Much of it gets ported out when you port the manifold though. The gains are from increased flow area, but it would be interesting to see a company come out with a cast manifold with larger, smoother runners but still used the pulse converter profile.
Um didn't you make one???

Back on topic...
I personnaly do not understand how anyone would not like the advantages of a twin scroll for daily driving/occasional track usage. The improved spool is worth it's weight in gold.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #25  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
I have built a couple manifolds. None have had a true pulse converter geometry though as it would be pretty difficult to fabricate and would be much better implemented in a cast piece.

The additional benefit of a pulse converter runner profile is you can use very short runners to reduce exhaust runner volume to improve transient response but still greatly reduce reversion under heavy exhaust back pressure. The shorter runners will reduce pressure losses and thermal losses but have the trade off of not using runners long enough to increase VE through resonance pulse tuning. As with everything, there are compromises to any design.

I'm personally in the longer runner shallow angle merge collector fan club as I would prefer sacrificing a little transient response for higher engine efficiency. But it would be great to see what a short runner pulse converter manifold could do if properly sized to a larger turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:15 PM
  #26  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by juanmedina
So what happen to the test on subies?
we are running Yimisport's 08 STI w/ twinscroll borgwarner 83-75 1.10 a/r at the modified magazine time attack this saturday
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #27  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
bump, new Modified magazine article just came out:

http://www.full-race.com/modified-twinscroll/



Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 11:28 PM
  #28  
kaymin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 769
Likes: 1
From: Washington State
that was awesome! Thanks geoff!
Reply
Old May 21, 2009 | 01:39 AM
  #29  
riceball777's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
twin scroll is the only way to go
Reply
Old May 21, 2009 | 07:19 AM
  #30  
RAbishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
It sounds good on paper, but I have yet to see convincing results.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44 AM.