Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

CBRD BBK Turbo... video... etc..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 04:03 PM
  #31  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
429whp out of one right now on our dyno..26psi..

cb

382 whp out of one yesterday
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 04:06 PM
  #32  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Nice work on the turbo & video!!
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #33  
s42k1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by grillpt
NICE!!!

is that a Haas CNC?
Yeah, its a TL2, a new mill is hopefully coming soon...
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #34  
DS-03evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by CBRD
429whp out of one right now on our dyno..26psi..

cb

382 whp out of one yesterday
Is that Charlie's car?
Great job on showing the CNC part of life. These turbos kick ***!!
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #35  
EvolutionBoy67's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: Fairfax, VA
damn 426whp!!! Thats a lot on your dyno especially for a stock location turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 11:01 PM
  #36  
mchuang's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 1
From: h town
Man this video makes me even lean more towards this turbo over the FP red. Do you have a list of all the available options.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 11:04 PM
  #37  
SickSilverNLow's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 0
From: OREGON
awesome vid.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 06:35 AM
  #38  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Charlies car did 415whp in the morning on the lite, in the evening it did 429whp on the full version, spool is ALMOST idential, maybe 150rpm slower, if that, max.... making it still dead on with a stocker or faster in some cases...

we didnt have much time to tune his car, because a vacuum line blew off, and some other little naggy issues... we will probably tinker with it more next week....

------------------------------

We are all kind of split on what we prefer..... I like the full version, Caleb my sales director has the Full on his car, he likes the power of the full, but the response of the Lite...

I put it like this...

autox/point and squirt street driving= Lite
open road driving/roadcourse= Full

they are both amazing combinations..

retail on a new FULL is 1650 shipped in the US right now (3-5 days to ship)
retail on a new LITE is 1200 = shipping in the US right now (3-5 days to ship)

cheers

cb
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #39  
itsme4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Outer Space
Originally Posted by CBRD
Charlies car did 415whp in the morning on the lite, in the evening it did 429whp on the full version, spool is ALMOST idential, maybe 150rpm slower, if that, max.... making it still dead on with a stocker or faster in some cases...

we didnt have much time to tune his car, because a vacuum line blew off, and some other little naggy issues... we will probably tinker with it more next week....

------------------------------

We are all kind of split on what we prefer..... I like the full version, Caleb my sales director has the Full on his car, he likes the power of the full, but the response of the Lite...

I put it like this...

autox/point and squirt street driving= Lite
open road driving/roadcourse= Full

they are both amazing combinations..

retail on a new FULL is 1650 shipped in the US right now (3-5 days to ship)
retail on a new LITE is 1200 = shipping in the US right now (3-5 days to ship)

cheers

cb

What are the differences between a full/lite, spec-wise?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #40  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Cool video. Good price for a painless upgrade.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 08:28 AM
  #41  
OhsixIXBish's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Perryville, MD
autox/point and squirt street driving= Lite
open road driving/roadcourse= Full
So chad would you perfer the lite im guessing for 1/4 mile?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 08:57 AM
  #42  
Vivid Racing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (98)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,260
Likes: 2
From: Gilbert, AZ
CB-

Amazing vid. Amazing turbo. Amazing work.

keep it up!

Evan Smith
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #43  
akauf's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: New Holland, Pa
Originally Posted by CBRD
Charlies car did 415whp in the morning on the lite, in the evening it did 429whp on the full version, spool is ALMOST idential, maybe 150rpm slower, if that, max.... making it still dead on with a stocker or faster in some cases...

we didnt have much time to tune his car, because a vacuum line blew off, and some other little naggy issues... we will probably tinker with it more next week....

------------------------------

We are all kind of split on what we prefer..... I like the full version, Caleb my sales director has the Full on his car, he likes the power of the full, but the response of the Lite...

I put it like this...

autox/point and squirt street driving= Lite
open road driving/roadcourse= Full

they are both amazing combinations..

retail on a new FULL is 1650 shipped in the US right now (3-5 days to ship)
retail on a new LITE is 1200 = shipping in the US right now (3-5 days to ship)

cheers

cb
So full loses <=150 rpm and gains 14whp over the lite in this particular case.

From this example it sounds as though they perform very similarly. Though you clearly give them different applications and there is a clear price difference. Can you elaborate please? Do you see there being much better power gains for the full when properly tuned?



Great work though charlies car sounded nasty at the dd.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #44  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by akauf
So full loses <=150 rpm and gains 14whp over the lite in this particular case.

From this example it sounds as though they perform very similarly. Though you clearly give them different applications and there is a clear price difference. Can you elaborate please? Do you see there being much better power gains for the full when properly tuned?



Great work though charlies car sounded nasty at the dd.
charlies tuning got cut short... unfortunately... ;(

on calebs car (without cams) we were able to pick up a peak of 32whp and 20 wtq i believe it was with the full version over the lite...

so.. if you figure you sent a core in... 795 for the lite, 1200 for the full..... the difference is less than a set of cams to pick up 20-30whp (depending on ur dyno)

if that makes sense..

cb
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 10:05 AM
  #45  
itsme4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Outer Space
they are great numbers indeed Im just curious what application they were attained to in conjuntion with? Stock evo8? Stock evo9? meth/race gace/pump? Built/stock motor?

Thanks.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 PM.