Tial Vs Garrett exhaust housings
Nov 11, 2008, 08:52 PM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tial Vs Garrett exhaust housings
Has anybody done any testing on these?
I recall David Buschur having one fitted at one stage, but cant find the results.
Trying to find out if the .82 Tial GT35R housing flows the same as the Garrett 4 bolt 3" outlet housing
Thanks
I recall David Buschur having one fitted at one stage, but cant find the results.
Trying to find out if the .82 Tial GT35R housing flows the same as the Garrett 4 bolt 3" outlet housing
Thanks
Nov 11, 2008, 09:45 PM
#2
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe the inlet volume is smaller, and that would become a choke point higher in the rev band. This could possibly be solved by a larger A/R housing. The way the housing is designed, spool should be better than an undivided housing, similar to a divided housing, and the weight savings would also be a plus. I think we need a back to back test between Garrett and Tial.
Nov 12, 2008, 12:20 AM
#3
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Markopoulo, Greece
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that AMS uses the Tial housing on their drag car and they have found some gains from it.I have it on my GT42R Evo 6.I'm going to the dyno (Mustang) in 2 weeks.i will post results!
Nov 12, 2008, 07:39 AM
#4
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe the inlet volume is smaller, and that would become a choke point higher in the rev band. This could possibly be solved by a larger A/R housing. The way the housing is designed, spool should be better than an undivided housing, similar to a divided housing, and the weight savings would also be a plus. I think we need a back to back test between Garrett and Tial.
Last edited by TiALSport; Nov 12, 2008 at 12:31 PM.
Nov 12, 2008, 10:05 AM
#7
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I made 600whp @ 24psi on pump gas (Sunoco 94) on my DSM with old school parts, and a regular GT35r with TiAL .82 v-band housing.
Bumping the boost to 33psi, falling to 31psi, on VP Q16, made 721whp.
This is with old school parts, Forrester Intake Manifold, Forrester headwork, HKS 272 cams, DSM NT Throttle body, etc.
These numbers (at that boost level) are amazing. I can't help but to think the TiAL housing had a big effect.
Bumping the boost to 33psi, falling to 31psi, on VP Q16, made 721whp.
This is with old school parts, Forrester Intake Manifold, Forrester headwork, HKS 272 cams, DSM NT Throttle body, etc.
These numbers (at that boost level) are amazing. I can't help but to think the TiAL housing had a big effect.
Trending Topics
Nov 12, 2008, 10:25 AM
#8
Other then having a round cross section at the inlet, it is essentially the same as a standard GT35 (3" diffuser outlet) turbine housing?
Of course, with the added benefit of being a thin wall stainless steel casting and having V-band inlet/outlet...
Of course, with the added benefit of being a thin wall stainless steel casting and having V-band inlet/outlet...
Last edited by 03whitegsr; Nov 12, 2008 at 12:46 PM.
Nov 12, 2008, 02:47 PM
#14
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
