Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

10-second, Full-Interior Evos That AutoX / Road Race?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 08:05 AM
  #1  
BoostLover99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: The Last Sorta Free State in the US
10-second, Full-Interior Evos That AutoX / Road Race?

Are there any 10-second, full-interior (sound insulation, radio, A/C, etc.) Evo owners who autocross and/or road race? What does your drivetrain look like in terms of mods?

I ask because the math seems to indicate that a 3500-lb car (including fluids, driver) needs about 700 whp to get into the 10s. http://www.tunercalcs.com.

All the dyno charts showing cars with over 700 whp on 91 octane gas seem to have torque curves that are very peaky and thus not suitable for anything but drag racing.

There must be a way to have your cake & eat it too.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #2  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Who makes 700 HP on 91 octane?

Why would you build an Auto-X car and leave it full weight?

Isn't somebody running 10s on the stock IX turbo with a "fully weight" MR though? While I don't think it would be a national Auto-X champion, I bet it would do just fine at the local races.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 10:27 AM
  #3  
Drifto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 809
Likes: 2
From: Alabaster, AL
Originally Posted by BoostLover99
Are there any 10-second, full-interior (sound insulation, radio, A/C, etc.) Evo owners who autocross and/or road race? What does your drivetrain look like in terms of mods?

I ask because the math seems to indicate that a 3500-lb car (including fluids, driver) needs about 700 whp to get into the 10s. http://www.tunercalcs.com.

All the dyno charts showing cars with over 700 whp on 91 octane gas seem to have torque curves that are very peaky and thus not suitable for anything but drag racing.

There must be a way to have your cake & eat it too.
Not sure where you numbers came from because when I enter 3500 and 520whp your link spits out 10.98.
700whp estimates 9.96
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #4  
andrewzaragoza's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 2
From: DFW, TX
With the right combination of mods and tune that is doable at around 500 whp. post your current mods and your target hp levels and people here will start giving you suggestions.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 12:30 PM
  #5  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by BoostLover99
There must be a way to have your cake & eat it too.
It's called a Z06

The power necessary for a 10 sec Evo from a 2.0L or even 2.3L means a big turbo = slow and late spoolup.

There are possibly two ways around this that I can think of: nitrous or adding a supercharger to create a twincharger system.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #6  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by BoostLover99
...dyno charts....over 700 whp on 91 octane.... have torque curves that are... peaky.....
Well, DUH!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #7  
BlueDemon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, Fl
^ lol
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #8  
Cyloc's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Area
It can be done with just over 500. It all depends if the person can drive.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #9  
jjm4life's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
From: boston
your calculations are wrong. you dont need 700whp to hit 10s. as for drivetrain, all you would need is a clutch that can handle whatever amount of torque you are putting down.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #10  
BoostLover99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: The Last Sorta Free State in the US
Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #11  
11secDSM's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Warrington, PA
My car pretty much fits your criteria. I run SM class and do pretty well with the car. It's definitely a crazy ride (skitzo power), but it's a blast. I wouldn't say it's the best setup for AutoX, but it's manageable.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 12:06 AM
  #12  
BoostLover99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: The Last Sorta Free State in the US
Originally Posted by 11secDSM
My car pretty much fits your criteria. I run SM class and do pretty well with the car. It's definitely a crazy ride (skitzo power), but it's a blast. I wouldn't say it's the best setup for AutoX, but it's manageable.
Thanks, Chris - I knew there was someone out there. Sent you a PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 09:10 AM
  #13  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by spdracerut
It's called a Z06 The power necessary for a 10 sec Evo from a 2.0L or even 2.3L means a big turbo = slow and late spoolup. There are possibly two ways around this that I can think of: nitrous or adding a supercharger to create a twincharger system.
I'd have to disagree with this assessment as there are several stock IX-equipped EVOs out there running mid-to-high 10s with either E-85 or race gas and I'm willing to bet they would be pretty exciting on the autocross course as well.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:15 PM.