Twin Turbo on Evo VIII
Watch out on all the apples to oranges comparisons.
From what I understand, the RX-7 and Supra TT use pseudo sequential style turbo setups. At low speed a valve closes off the exhaust tract to the big turbo, allowing a small turbo to spool up quickly and providing good low-end response. As load, RPM, etc. increase, the valve opens up allowing the second, larger turbo to spool up, giving even more air. That is what I could find about the Supra TT at least, and I'm pretty sure the RX7's was similar from what I've heard.
Now all this leads to a lot of complexity. You have the valve and its control, half the exhaust being cut off some of the time, etc. This can be a big pain when you start upgrading and want to go for big power, possibly upgrading the turbos. That's why I'm guessing a lot of guys rip the TT system out and go to 1 big turbo. Others (like bricke said above) have set it up to a full-time parallel system where the valve to the second turbo is always open.
The TT system in cars like the Legacy or Skyline should be a true parallel system, with half the cylinders spooling one turbo, the other half spooling the other turbo. In something like a V or H engine, this makes packaging/exhaust plumbing much easier. Just hang the turbo right off its bank of cylinders. And these turbo systems can be just as "simple" as a single turbo setup.
From what I understand, the RX-7 and Supra TT use pseudo sequential style turbo setups. At low speed a valve closes off the exhaust tract to the big turbo, allowing a small turbo to spool up quickly and providing good low-end response. As load, RPM, etc. increase, the valve opens up allowing the second, larger turbo to spool up, giving even more air. That is what I could find about the Supra TT at least, and I'm pretty sure the RX7's was similar from what I've heard.
Now all this leads to a lot of complexity. You have the valve and its control, half the exhaust being cut off some of the time, etc. This can be a big pain when you start upgrading and want to go for big power, possibly upgrading the turbos. That's why I'm guessing a lot of guys rip the TT system out and go to 1 big turbo. Others (like bricke said above) have set it up to a full-time parallel system where the valve to the second turbo is always open.
The TT system in cars like the Legacy or Skyline should be a true parallel system, with half the cylinders spooling one turbo, the other half spooling the other turbo. In something like a V or H engine, this makes packaging/exhaust plumbing much easier. Just hang the turbo right off its bank of cylinders. And these turbo systems can be just as "simple" as a single turbo setup.
You are not 100% correct. If you are running twin turbos sequentially you will have spool up at lower RPM. I know from experience with my RX7 that when I ran my twins sequentially I had nearly full spool up by 3k RPMs, where as when I ran them non-sequentially (as in working as one big turbo) I didn't get full spool until nearly 4700RPMs.
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki
The first Triple Turbo supra was just completed btw...probably won't make T-88 numbers...but it will be quick...
The first Triple Turbo supra was just completed btw...probably won't make T-88 numbers...but it will be quick...
Originally posted by iodine23
The TT system in cars like the Legacy or Skyline should be a true parallel system, with half the cylinders spooling one turbo, the other half spooling the other turbo. In something like a V or H engine, this makes packaging/exhaust plumbing much easier. Just hang the turbo right off its bank of cylinders. And these turbo systems can be just as "simple" as a single turbo setup.
The TT system in cars like the Legacy or Skyline should be a true parallel system, with half the cylinders spooling one turbo, the other half spooling the other turbo. In something like a V or H engine, this makes packaging/exhaust plumbing much easier. Just hang the turbo right off its bank of cylinders. And these turbo systems can be just as "simple" as a single turbo setup.
And I agree, it's ridiculous to expend mental energy contemplating a twin setup on an engine as small as the EVO's.
the reason Subaru has done some twin turbo setups (sequential) on their flat 4 is strictly because of the layout of the engine, it's a twin bank.
Two banks of two cylinders allow you to do a twin turbo setup fairly easily, in fact the piping works pretty well. Matrix engineering in portland did a twin turbo 2.5RS as well, I don't know the power output but they seem to think it works pretty well. Still though, no one has done a really high power output twin turbo subaru engine to my knowledge, 2.5L or else.
But, on the evo it's an inline 4...the piping and exhaust manifold setup would probably be a nightmare to do a twin turbo setup, and definitely not worth the time invested, especially for 2.0L of displacement.
Two banks of two cylinders allow you to do a twin turbo setup fairly easily, in fact the piping works pretty well. Matrix engineering in portland did a twin turbo 2.5RS as well, I don't know the power output but they seem to think it works pretty well. Still though, no one has done a really high power output twin turbo subaru engine to my knowledge, 2.5L or else.
But, on the evo it's an inline 4...the piping and exhaust manifold setup would probably be a nightmare to do a twin turbo setup, and definitely not worth the time invested, especially for 2.0L of displacement.
rarson: I know the Skyline is an I6. I guess my paragraph wasn't worded very clearly since I switched thoughts mid-stream to talk about banking and such. Funny you should mention the Supra being 3L, cuz the Skyline engine a 2.6L. And it's running a true parallel twin turbo setup.
Ben: I think that a company in AZ tried to make a twin turbo 2.5RS, Forced Air Technologies maybe? I don't think they ever took it to market though. Last I heard (a few years back) they were having problems with the prototype.
Ben: I think that a company in AZ tried to make a twin turbo 2.5RS, Forced Air Technologies maybe? I don't think they ever took it to market though. Last I heard (a few years back) they were having problems with the prototype.
Yeah, but all the big horsepower turbo upgrades switch it to one, as it should be.
And the GTR ('Spec's aside) is the only Skyline with the 2.6 in it. R33 and R34 GTS-T's have the 2.5 and R32 GTS-T's have the 2.0 in them.
And the GTR ('Spec's aside) is the only Skyline with the 2.6 in it. R33 and R34 GTS-T's have the 2.5 and R32 GTS-T's have the 2.0 in them.
Better yet - Look into a twin charged setup - both supercharger for low end grunt and turbocharged for maximum high rpm flow. you'd never know you had only a 2.0L motor.
old mid 80s MR2s had a few of these setups making just under 600hp that felt like a V8 from idle.
old mid 80s MR2s had a few of these setups making just under 600hp that felt like a V8 from idle.
MechTech made a twin turbo kit for the MR2 using Aerodyne turbos. One of the few cars that are known to have the kit is owned by a guy on the MR2 boards who goes by Pouya. His car makes 370ish whp and hits full boost in the high 2000rpms IIRC.
His website has a lot of info, but no performance figures. http://www.madpsi.net/PMR2.htm
I would prefer a single turbo, if it could do the same.
D
His website has a lot of info, but no performance figures. http://www.madpsi.net/PMR2.htm
I would prefer a single turbo, if it could do the same.
D




