Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Twin Turbo on Evo VIII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 09:38 AM
  #16  
iodine23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Watch out on all the apples to oranges comparisons.

From what I understand, the RX-7 and Supra TT use pseudo sequential style turbo setups. At low speed a valve closes off the exhaust tract to the big turbo, allowing a small turbo to spool up quickly and providing good low-end response. As load, RPM, etc. increase, the valve opens up allowing the second, larger turbo to spool up, giving even more air. That is what I could find about the Supra TT at least, and I'm pretty sure the RX7's was similar from what I've heard.

Now all this leads to a lot of complexity. You have the valve and its control, half the exhaust being cut off some of the time, etc. This can be a big pain when you start upgrading and want to go for big power, possibly upgrading the turbos. That's why I'm guessing a lot of guys rip the TT system out and go to 1 big turbo. Others (like bricke said above) have set it up to a full-time parallel system where the valve to the second turbo is always open.

The TT system in cars like the Legacy or Skyline should be a true parallel system, with half the cylinders spooling one turbo, the other half spooling the other turbo. In something like a V or H engine, this makes packaging/exhaust plumbing much easier. Just hang the turbo right off its bank of cylinders. And these turbo systems can be just as "simple" as a single turbo setup.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 11:31 AM
  #17  
Want to Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: The OC
You are not 100% correct. If you are running twin turbos sequentially you will have spool up at lower RPM. I know from experience with my RX7 that when I ran my twins sequentially I had nearly full spool up by 3k RPMs, where as when I ran them non-sequentially (as in working as one big turbo) I didn't get full spool until nearly 4700RPMs.
True but you could not get an evo to work with a sequential setup. it wouldnt be worth it. you have 4wd you dont need to worry about spool just launch at a higher rpm and dont worry about it.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 01:33 PM
  #18  
PocketAces's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Why can't we all just agree that it would be an idiotic waste of time and money to attempt a fabrication of a twin turbo setup on an evo?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 01:57 PM
  #19  
bs's Avatar
bs
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki

The first Triple Turbo supra was just completed btw...probably won't make T-88 numbers...but it will be quick...
Uh....I remember a triple turbo supra being completed quite a while back. I will have to dig through my stack of magazines to find it, but it was a guy in Phoenix and I think he used it mainly as a show car. It had 3 15" JL speakers and it only made about 600hp.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 04:22 PM
  #20  
rarson's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Originally posted by iodine23
The TT system in cars like the Legacy or Skyline should be a true parallel system, with half the cylinders spooling one turbo, the other half spooling the other turbo. In something like a V or H engine, this makes packaging/exhaust plumbing much easier. Just hang the turbo right off its bank of cylinders. And these turbo systems can be just as "simple" as a single turbo setup.
The Skyline has a straight six in it. In my opinion, twin turbos are only worthwhile on either V/H style engines, or straight engines that are large enough. The Supra engine at only 3 liters is not large enough to take real advantage of a large, parallel twin setup. Now, if it were 5 liters or so, twin would be the way to go.

And I agree, it's ridiculous to expend mental energy contemplating a twin setup on an engine as small as the EVO's.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 05:07 PM
  #21  
Ben@Achtuning's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
the reason Subaru has done some twin turbo setups (sequential) on their flat 4 is strictly because of the layout of the engine, it's a twin bank.

Two banks of two cylinders allow you to do a twin turbo setup fairly easily, in fact the piping works pretty well. Matrix engineering in portland did a twin turbo 2.5RS as well, I don't know the power output but they seem to think it works pretty well. Still though, no one has done a really high power output twin turbo subaru engine to my knowledge, 2.5L or else.

But, on the evo it's an inline 4...the piping and exhaust manifold setup would probably be a nightmare to do a twin turbo setup, and definitely not worth the time invested, especially for 2.0L of displacement.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 10:09 AM
  #22  
iodine23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
rarson: I know the Skyline is an I6. I guess my paragraph wasn't worded very clearly since I switched thoughts mid-stream to talk about banking and such. Funny you should mention the Supra being 3L, cuz the Skyline engine a 2.6L. And it's running a true parallel twin turbo setup.

Ben: I think that a company in AZ tried to make a twin turbo 2.5RS, Forced Air Technologies maybe? I don't think they ever took it to market though. Last I heard (a few years back) they were having problems with the prototype.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 01:57 PM
  #23  
rarson's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Yeah, but all the big horsepower turbo upgrades switch it to one, as it should be.

And the GTR ('Spec's aside) is the only Skyline with the 2.6 in it. R33 and R34 GTS-T's have the 2.5 and R32 GTS-T's have the 2.0 in them.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 02:08 PM
  #24  
rarson's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Damn wireless ethernet flaking out on me again.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 02:27 PM
  #25  
Mister2zx3's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
Better yet - Look into a twin charged setup - both supercharger for low end grunt and turbocharged for maximum high rpm flow. you'd never know you had only a 2.0L motor.

old mid 80s MR2s had a few of these setups making just under 600hp that felt like a V8 from idle.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 06:01 PM
  #26  
articfury's Avatar
Newbie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Texas
MechTech made a twin turbo kit for the MR2 using Aerodyne turbos. One of the few cars that are known to have the kit is owned by a guy on the MR2 boards who goes by Pouya. His car makes 370ish whp and hits full boost in the high 2000rpms IIRC.

His website has a lot of info, but no performance figures. http://www.madpsi.net/PMR2.htm

I would prefer a single turbo, if it could do the same.

D
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:42 PM.